Republication of “Primary Ankle Arthrodesis vs ORIF for Severely Comminuted Pilon Fractures: A Comparative Retrospective Study”
Background: The treatment for highly comminuted pilon fractures remains controversial. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to compare functional outcomes of primary arthrodesis of the tibiotalar joint (fusion) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Methods: Patients who underwent p...
Main Authors: | Colin H. Beckwitt BS, Spencer J. Monaco DPM, Gary S. Gruen MD |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2023-08-01
|
Series: | Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114231193391 |
Similar Items
-
Primary Ankle Arthrodesis vs ORIF for Severely Comminuted Pilon Fractures
by: Colin H. Beckwitt BS, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Cost Efficiency of Ankle Fracture ORIF at an Ambulatory Surgical Center vs Hospital
by: John R. Allen, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01) -
Combined ORIF and Subtalar Arthrodesis Technique for Talar Neck Fracture Dislocations
by: Lauren Luther MD, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis for complex displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures
by: Emmanuel David Eisenstein, MD, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Comparison of Complications and Reoperation Rates of Minimally Invasive Circular Fixation vs Conventional ORIF for AO/ASIF C3 Pilon Fractures
by: Gonzalo F. Bastias MD, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)