Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition

The possible transfer of musical expertise to the acquisition of syntactical structures in first and second language has emerged recently as an intriguing topic in the research of cognitive processes. However, it is unlikely that the benefits of musical training extend equally to the acquisition of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garvin eBrod, Bertram eOpitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00543/full
_version_ 1831654706012749824
author Garvin eBrod
Garvin eBrod
Bertram eOpitz
Bertram eOpitz
author_facet Garvin eBrod
Garvin eBrod
Bertram eOpitz
Bertram eOpitz
author_sort Garvin eBrod
collection DOAJ
description The possible transfer of musical expertise to the acquisition of syntactical structures in first and second language has emerged recently as an intriguing topic in the research of cognitive processes. However, it is unlikely that the benefits of musical training extend equally to the acquisition of all syntactical structures. As cognitive transfer presumably requires overlapping processing components and brain regions involved in these processing components, one can surmise that transfer between musical ability and syntax acquisition would be limited to structural elements that are shared between the two. We propose that musical expertise transfers only to the processing of recursive long-distance dependencies inherent in hierarchical syntactic structures. In this study, we taught fifty-six participants with widely varying degrees of musical expertise the artificial language BROCANTO, which allows the direct comparison of long-distance and local dependencies. We found that the quantity of musical training (measured in accumulated hours of practice and instruction) explained unique variance in performance in the long-distance dependency condition only. These data suggest that musical training facilitates the acquisition specifically of hierarchical syntactic structures.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T16:33:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-704b2c32ece44423a2c2c806aa5a71cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T16:33:13Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-704b2c32ece44423a2c2c806aa5a71cd2022-12-21T20:14:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782012-12-01310.3389/fpsyg.2012.0054336488Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisitionGarvin eBrod0Garvin eBrod1Bertram eOpitz2Bertram eOpitz3Max Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentSaarland UniversitySaarland UniversityUniversity of SurreyThe possible transfer of musical expertise to the acquisition of syntactical structures in first and second language has emerged recently as an intriguing topic in the research of cognitive processes. However, it is unlikely that the benefits of musical training extend equally to the acquisition of all syntactical structures. As cognitive transfer presumably requires overlapping processing components and brain regions involved in these processing components, one can surmise that transfer between musical ability and syntax acquisition would be limited to structural elements that are shared between the two. We propose that musical expertise transfers only to the processing of recursive long-distance dependencies inherent in hierarchical syntactic structures. In this study, we taught fifty-six participants with widely varying degrees of musical expertise the artificial language BROCANTO, which allows the direct comparison of long-distance and local dependencies. We found that the quantity of musical training (measured in accumulated hours of practice and instruction) explained unique variance in performance in the long-distance dependency condition only. These data suggest that musical training facilitates the acquisition specifically of hierarchical syntactic structures.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00543/fullmusical trainingtransfer effectsSyntax acquisitionhierarchical syntaxL2 learning
spellingShingle Garvin eBrod
Garvin eBrod
Bertram eOpitz
Bertram eOpitz
Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition
Frontiers in Psychology
musical training
transfer effects
Syntax acquisition
hierarchical syntax
L2 learning
title Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition
title_full Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition
title_fullStr Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition
title_short Does it really matter? Separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition
title_sort does it really matter separating the effects of musical training on syntax acquisition
topic musical training
transfer effects
Syntax acquisition
hierarchical syntax
L2 learning
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00543/full
work_keys_str_mv AT garvinebrod doesitreallymatterseparatingtheeffectsofmusicaltrainingonsyntaxacquisition
AT garvinebrod doesitreallymatterseparatingtheeffectsofmusicaltrainingonsyntaxacquisition
AT bertrameopitz doesitreallymatterseparatingtheeffectsofmusicaltrainingonsyntaxacquisition
AT bertrameopitz doesitreallymatterseparatingtheeffectsofmusicaltrainingonsyntaxacquisition