Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companies

Background Outside of the United States, Canada is the country with the greatest number of lawsuits filed against tobacco companies. Since 2000, each of Canada’s provincial governments has filed for recovery of healthcare costs. Class action lawsuits filed in Quebec resulted in a lower court victory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cynthia Callard, Neil Collishaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Publishing 2020-10-01
Series:Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
Online Access:https://www.tobaccopreventioncessation.com/Lessons-from-Canada-s-20-year-lawsuits-against-tobacco-companies,128456,0,2.html
_version_ 1797337951347146752
author Cynthia Callard
Neil Collishaw
author_facet Cynthia Callard
Neil Collishaw
author_sort Cynthia Callard
collection DOAJ
description Background Outside of the United States, Canada is the country with the greatest number of lawsuits filed against tobacco companies. Since 2000, each of Canada’s provincial governments has filed for recovery of healthcare costs. Class action lawsuits filed in Quebec resulted in a lower court victory in 2015 and a provincial appeal court victory on 1 March 2019, with the companies jointly ordered to pay more than €9 billion to 100000 Quebec smokers. Soon after, the companies filed for insolvency protection drawing all governments and other litigants into negotiations towards a global settlement. Health interests have been excluded from these discussions, and there is little indication whether or how these suits will serve a public health interest. Other FCTC parties can learn from the Canadian experience on how better to align litigation activities with tobacco control. Objectives To assess the impact of Canada’s tobacco litigation on public health Methods Analysis of court filings, court proceedings, public statements. Results To date, there is no indication that the lawsuits are intended to support tobacco control efforts. Contributing factors may include secrecy of proceedings, lack of involvement of health ministries in key decisions, change of governments, lack of oversight by the media and health charities. Conclusions Parties intending to use litigation to support tobacco control efforts should ensure that these objectives are established in the legislation used to enable the suits. Other steps may also be required.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:22:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-705ec669df8645e0b0a256de447bd10a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2459-3087
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:22:59Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher European Publishing
record_format Article
series Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
spelling doaj.art-705ec669df8645e0b0a256de447bd10a2024-01-31T10:31:16ZengEuropean PublishingTobacco Prevention and Cessation2459-30872020-10-016Supplement10.18332/tpc/128456128456Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companiesCynthia Callard0Neil Collishaw1Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, Ottawa, CanadaPhysicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, Ottawa, CanadaBackground Outside of the United States, Canada is the country with the greatest number of lawsuits filed against tobacco companies. Since 2000, each of Canada’s provincial governments has filed for recovery of healthcare costs. Class action lawsuits filed in Quebec resulted in a lower court victory in 2015 and a provincial appeal court victory on 1 March 2019, with the companies jointly ordered to pay more than €9 billion to 100000 Quebec smokers. Soon after, the companies filed for insolvency protection drawing all governments and other litigants into negotiations towards a global settlement. Health interests have been excluded from these discussions, and there is little indication whether or how these suits will serve a public health interest. Other FCTC parties can learn from the Canadian experience on how better to align litigation activities with tobacco control. Objectives To assess the impact of Canada’s tobacco litigation on public health Methods Analysis of court filings, court proceedings, public statements. Results To date, there is no indication that the lawsuits are intended to support tobacco control efforts. Contributing factors may include secrecy of proceedings, lack of involvement of health ministries in key decisions, change of governments, lack of oversight by the media and health charities. Conclusions Parties intending to use litigation to support tobacco control efforts should ensure that these objectives are established in the legislation used to enable the suits. Other steps may also be required.https://www.tobaccopreventioncessation.com/Lessons-from-Canada-s-20-year-lawsuits-against-tobacco-companies,128456,0,2.html
spellingShingle Cynthia Callard
Neil Collishaw
Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companies
Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
title Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companies
title_full Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companies
title_fullStr Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companies
title_full_unstemmed Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companies
title_short Lessons from Canada’s 20-year lawsuits against tobacco companies
title_sort lessons from canada s 20 year lawsuits against tobacco companies
url https://www.tobaccopreventioncessation.com/Lessons-from-Canada-s-20-year-lawsuits-against-tobacco-companies,128456,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT cynthiacallard lessonsfromcanadas20yearlawsuitsagainsttobaccocompanies
AT neilcollishaw lessonsfromcanadas20yearlawsuitsagainsttobaccocompanies