Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Urinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between use of the maximal urethral length preservation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tian-Yu Xiong, Zhan-Liang Liu, Hao-Yu Wu, Yun-Peng Fan, Yi-Nong Niu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-03-01
Series:Asian Journal of Andrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/aja202481
_version_ 1826532549480939520
author Tian-Yu Xiong
Zhan-Liang Liu
Hao-Yu Wu
Yun-Peng Fan
Yi-Nong Niu
author_facet Tian-Yu Xiong
Zhan-Liang Liu
Hao-Yu Wu
Yun-Peng Fan
Yi-Nong Niu
author_sort Tian-Yu Xiong
collection DOAJ
description Urinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between use of the maximal urethral length preservation (MULP) technique and postoperative urinary continence in patients undergoing RARP. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and calculate the odds ratio (OR) from eligible studies on continence and MULP. Six studies involving 1869 patients met the eligibility criteria. MULP was positively associated with both early continence (1 month after RARP; Z = 3.62, P = 0.003, OR = 3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68–5.73) and late continence (12 months after RARP; Z = 2.34, P = 0.019, OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.13–3.90). Oncological outcomes indicated that MULP did not increase the overall positive surgical margin rate or the positive surgical margin status at the prostate apex (both P > 0.05). In conclusion, the use of the MULP technique in RARP significantly improved both early and late postoperative continence outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.
first_indexed 2025-03-14T01:53:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-706151158d2b424386165513eb4e65c6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1008-682X
1745-7262
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T01:53:00Z
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Andrology
spelling doaj.art-706151158d2b424386165513eb4e65c62025-03-12T10:25:21ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAsian Journal of Andrology1008-682X1745-72622025-03-0127222523010.4103/aja202481Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic reviewTian-Yu XiongZhan-Liang LiuHao-Yu WuYun-Peng FanYi-Nong NiuUrinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery. In this meta-analysis, we examined the association between use of the maximal urethral length preservation (MULP) technique and postoperative urinary continence in patients undergoing RARP. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and calculate the odds ratio (OR) from eligible studies on continence and MULP. Six studies involving 1869 patients met the eligibility criteria. MULP was positively associated with both early continence (1 month after RARP; Z = 3.62, P = 0.003, OR = 3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68–5.73) and late continence (12 months after RARP; Z = 2.34, P = 0.019, OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.13–3.90). Oncological outcomes indicated that MULP did not increase the overall positive surgical margin rate or the positive surgical margin status at the prostate apex (both P > 0.05). In conclusion, the use of the MULP technique in RARP significantly improved both early and late postoperative continence outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/aja202481prostate cancerprostatectomyrobot-assisted surgeryurinary incontinence
spellingShingle Tian-Yu Xiong
Zhan-Liang Liu
Hao-Yu Wu
Yun-Peng Fan
Yi-Nong Niu
Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Asian Journal of Andrology
prostate cancer
prostatectomy
robot-assisted surgery
urinary incontinence
title Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy a meta analysis and systematic review
topic prostate cancer
prostatectomy
robot-assisted surgery
urinary incontinence
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/aja202481
work_keys_str_mv AT tianyuxiong associationbetweenmaximalurethrallengthpreservationandpostoperativecontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT zhanliangliu associationbetweenmaximalurethrallengthpreservationandpostoperativecontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT haoyuwu associationbetweenmaximalurethrallengthpreservationandpostoperativecontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT yunpengfan associationbetweenmaximalurethrallengthpreservationandpostoperativecontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT yinongniu associationbetweenmaximalurethrallengthpreservationandpostoperativecontinenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyametaanalysisandsystematicreview