Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study

Background: Chemomechanical methods such as Papacarie were developed as alternate dental caries removal methods to overcome major disadvantages of the conventional drilling technique. However, few studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Papacarie for caries removal using scanning electron microsco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jehan AlHumaid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sjmms.net/article.asp?issn=1658-631X;year=2020;volume=8;issue=1;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=AlHumaid
_version_ 1828811947366154240
author Jehan AlHumaid
author_facet Jehan AlHumaid
author_sort Jehan AlHumaid
collection DOAJ
description Background: Chemomechanical methods such as Papacarie were developed as alternate dental caries removal methods to overcome major disadvantages of the conventional drilling technique. However, few studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Papacarie for caries removal using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and efficiency of Papacarie and the conventional bur method in caries removal from primary teeth. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 30 freshly extracted, human primary molars with dentinal caries were obtained from the outpatient clinics at the Dental Hospital of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Each tooth was sectioned mesiodistally into two halves through the center of the lesion, and each half was randomly subjected to caries removal by Papacarie (Group I) and excavation using the conventional bur method (Group II). Time taken (efficiency) for removal of caries was noted using a stopwatch. Samples were then examined under SEM for presence of bacterial colonies (efficacy). For efficiency, data were analyzed using chi-square, and for efficacy, using t-test. Results: There was no significant difference in the presence of bacteria in both groups under SEM (Papacarie = 23.3%; conventional method = 16.7%; P = 0.52). However, significantly more time was taken for caries removal with Papacarie (mean = 351.56 s) than with the conventional bur method (mean = 158.41 s) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Papacarie is as effective in removing dentinal bacteria as the conventional caries removal method but is less efficient, as the time taken for excavation was longer.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:36:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-706902ec7ce84001b618daf7d3698363
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1658-631X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:36:07Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-706902ec7ce84001b618daf7d36983632022-12-22T00:28:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences1658-631X2020-01-0181414510.4103/sjmms.sjmms_104_18Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM studyJehan AlHumaidBackground: Chemomechanical methods such as Papacarie were developed as alternate dental caries removal methods to overcome major disadvantages of the conventional drilling technique. However, few studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Papacarie for caries removal using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and efficiency of Papacarie and the conventional bur method in caries removal from primary teeth. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 30 freshly extracted, human primary molars with dentinal caries were obtained from the outpatient clinics at the Dental Hospital of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Each tooth was sectioned mesiodistally into two halves through the center of the lesion, and each half was randomly subjected to caries removal by Papacarie (Group I) and excavation using the conventional bur method (Group II). Time taken (efficiency) for removal of caries was noted using a stopwatch. Samples were then examined under SEM for presence of bacterial colonies (efficacy). For efficiency, data were analyzed using chi-square, and for efficacy, using t-test. Results: There was no significant difference in the presence of bacteria in both groups under SEM (Papacarie = 23.3%; conventional method = 16.7%; P = 0.52). However, significantly more time was taken for caries removal with Papacarie (mean = 351.56 s) than with the conventional bur method (mean = 158.41 s) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Papacarie is as effective in removing dentinal bacteria as the conventional caries removal method but is less efficient, as the time taken for excavation was longer.http://www.sjmms.net/article.asp?issn=1658-631X;year=2020;volume=8;issue=1;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=AlHumaiddental cariespapacarieprimary teethscanning electron microscope
spellingShingle Jehan AlHumaid
Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study
Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences
dental caries
papacarie
primary teeth
scanning electron microscope
title Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study
title_full Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study
title_fullStr Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study
title_short Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study
title_sort efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth an sem study
topic dental caries
papacarie
primary teeth
scanning electron microscope
url http://www.sjmms.net/article.asp?issn=1658-631X;year=2020;volume=8;issue=1;spage=41;epage=45;aulast=AlHumaid
work_keys_str_mv AT jehanalhumaid efficacyandefficiencyofpapacarieversusconventionalmethodincariesremovalinprimaryteethansemstudy