A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis
Kamen V Vlassakov, Igor Kissin Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess progress in the field of anesthesia monitoring over the past 40 years...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Drug Design, Development and Therapy |
Online Access: | http://www.dovepress.com/a-quest-to-increase-safety-of-anesthetics-by-advancements-in-anesthesi-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT |
_version_ | 1818267367223853056 |
---|---|
author | Vlassakov KV Kissin I |
author_facet | Vlassakov KV Kissin I |
author_sort | Vlassakov KV |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Kamen V Vlassakov, Igor Kissin Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess progress in the field of anesthesia monitoring over the past 40 years using scientometric analysis. The following scientometric indexes were used: popularity indexes (general and specific), representing the proportion of articles on either a topic relative to all articles in the field of anesthetics (general popularity index, GPI) or the subfield of anesthesia monitoring (specific popularity index, SPI); index of change (IC), representing the degree of growth in publications on a topic from one period to the next; and index of expectations (IE), representing the ratio of the number of articles on a topic in the top 20 journals relative to the number of articles in all (>5,000) biomedical journals covered by PubMed. Publications on 33 anesthesia-monitoring topics were assessed. Our analysis showed that over the past 40 years, the rate of rise in the number of articles on anesthesia monitoring was exponential, with an increase of more than eleven-fold, from 296 articles over the 5-year period 1974–1978 to 3,394 articles for 2009–2013. This rise profoundly exceeded the rate of rise of the number of articles on general anesthetics. The difference was especially evident with the comparison of the related GPIs: stable growth of the GPI for anesthesia monitoring vs constant decline in the GPI for general anesthetics. By the 2009–2013 period, among specific monitoring topics introduced after 1980, the SPI index had a meaningful magnitude (≥1.5) in 9 of 24 topics: Bispectral Index (7.8), Transesophageal Echocardiography (4.2), Electromyo­graphy (2.8), Pulse Oximetry (2.4), Entropy (2.3), Train-of-four (2.3), Capnography (1.9), Pulse Contour (1.9), and Electrical Nerve Stimulation for neuromuscular monitoring (1.6). Only one of these topics (Pulse Contour) demonstrated (in 2009–2013) high values for both IC and IE indexes (76 and 16.9, respectively), indicating significant recent progress. We suggest that rapid growth in the field of anesthetic monitoring was one of the most important developments to compensate for the intrinsically low margins of safety of anesthetic agents. Keywords: anesthesia-related morbidity, anesthesia-related mortality, anesthetics, general anesthesia, regional anesthesia |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T20:21:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-706bc57ec69b4834b893f97012c997ff |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1177-8881 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T20:21:28Z |
publishDate | 2015-05-01 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Drug Design, Development and Therapy |
spelling | doaj.art-706bc57ec69b4834b893f97012c997ff2022-12-22T00:13:15ZengDove Medical PressDrug Design, Development and Therapy1177-88812015-05-012015default2599260821681A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysisVlassakov KVKissin IKamen V Vlassakov, Igor Kissin Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess progress in the field of anesthesia monitoring over the past 40 years using scientometric analysis. The following scientometric indexes were used: popularity indexes (general and specific), representing the proportion of articles on either a topic relative to all articles in the field of anesthetics (general popularity index, GPI) or the subfield of anesthesia monitoring (specific popularity index, SPI); index of change (IC), representing the degree of growth in publications on a topic from one period to the next; and index of expectations (IE), representing the ratio of the number of articles on a topic in the top 20 journals relative to the number of articles in all (>5,000) biomedical journals covered by PubMed. Publications on 33 anesthesia-monitoring topics were assessed. Our analysis showed that over the past 40 years, the rate of rise in the number of articles on anesthesia monitoring was exponential, with an increase of more than eleven-fold, from 296 articles over the 5-year period 1974–1978 to 3,394 articles for 2009–2013. This rise profoundly exceeded the rate of rise of the number of articles on general anesthetics. The difference was especially evident with the comparison of the related GPIs: stable growth of the GPI for anesthesia monitoring vs constant decline in the GPI for general anesthetics. By the 2009–2013 period, among specific monitoring topics introduced after 1980, the SPI index had a meaningful magnitude (≥1.5) in 9 of 24 topics: Bispectral Index (7.8), Transesophageal Echocardiography (4.2), Electromyo­graphy (2.8), Pulse Oximetry (2.4), Entropy (2.3), Train-of-four (2.3), Capnography (1.9), Pulse Contour (1.9), and Electrical Nerve Stimulation for neuromuscular monitoring (1.6). Only one of these topics (Pulse Contour) demonstrated (in 2009–2013) high values for both IC and IE indexes (76 and 16.9, respectively), indicating significant recent progress. We suggest that rapid growth in the field of anesthetic monitoring was one of the most important developments to compensate for the intrinsically low margins of safety of anesthetic agents. Keywords: anesthesia-related morbidity, anesthesia-related mortality, anesthetics, general anesthesia, regional anesthesiahttp://www.dovepress.com/a-quest-to-increase-safety-of-anesthetics-by-advancements-in-anesthesi-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT |
spellingShingle | Vlassakov KV Kissin I A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis Drug Design, Development and Therapy |
title | A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis |
title_full | A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis |
title_fullStr | A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis |
title_short | A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis |
title_sort | quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring scientometric analysis |
url | http://www.dovepress.com/a-quest-to-increase-safety-of-anesthetics-by-advancements-in-anesthesi-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vlassakovkv aquesttoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis AT kissini aquesttoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis AT vlassakovkv questtoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis AT kissini questtoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis |