A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis

Kamen V Vlassakov, Igor Kissin Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess progress in the field of anesthesia monitoring over the past 40 years...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vlassakov KV, Kissin I
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2015-05-01
Series:Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/a-quest-to-increase-safety-of-anesthetics-by-advancements-in-anesthesi-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT
_version_ 1818267367223853056
author Vlassakov KV
Kissin I
author_facet Vlassakov KV
Kissin I
author_sort Vlassakov KV
collection DOAJ
description Kamen V Vlassakov, Igor Kissin Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess progress in the field of anesthesia monitoring over the past 40 years using scientometric analysis. The following scientometric indexes were used: popularity indexes (general and specific), representing the proportion of articles on either a topic relative to all articles in the field of anesthetics (general popularity index, GPI) or the subfield of anesthesia monitoring (specific popularity index, SPI); index of change (IC), representing the degree of growth in publications on a topic from one period to the next; and index of expectations (IE), representing the ratio of the number of articles on a topic in the top 20 journals relative to the number of articles in all (>5,000) biomedical journals covered by PubMed. Publications on 33 anesthesia-monitoring topics were assessed. Our analysis showed that over the past 40 years, the rate of rise in the number of articles on anesthesia monitoring was exponential, with an increase of more than eleven-fold, from 296 articles over the 5-year period 1974–1978 to 3,394 articles for 2009–2013. This rise profoundly exceeded the rate of rise of the number of articles on general anesthetics. The difference was especially evident with the comparison of the related GPIs: stable growth of the GPI for anesthesia monitoring vs constant decline in the GPI for general anesthetics. By the 2009–2013 period, among specific monitoring topics introduced after 1980, the SPI index had a meaningful magnitude (≥1.5) in 9 of 24 topics: Bispectral Index (7.8), Transesophageal Echocardiography (4.2), Electromyo­graphy (2.8), Pulse Oximetry (2.4), Entropy (2.3), Train-of-four (2.3), Capnography (1.9), Pulse Contour (1.9), and Electrical Nerve Stimulation for neuromuscular monitoring (1.6). Only one of these topics (Pulse Contour) demonstrated (in 2009–2013) high values for both IC and IE indexes (76 and 16.9, respectively), indicating significant recent progress. We suggest that rapid growth in the field of anesthetic monitoring was one of the most important developments to compensate for the intrinsically low margins of safety of anesthetic agents. Keywords: anesthesia-related morbidity, anesthesia-related mortality, anesthetics, general anesthesia, regional anesthesia
first_indexed 2024-12-12T20:21:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-706bc57ec69b4834b893f97012c997ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-8881
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T20:21:28Z
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Drug Design, Development and Therapy
spelling doaj.art-706bc57ec69b4834b893f97012c997ff2022-12-22T00:13:15ZengDove Medical PressDrug Design, Development and Therapy1177-88812015-05-012015default2599260821681A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysisVlassakov KVKissin IKamen V Vlassakov, Igor Kissin Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess progress in the field of anesthesia monitoring over the past 40 years using scientometric analysis. The following scientometric indexes were used: popularity indexes (general and specific), representing the proportion of articles on either a topic relative to all articles in the field of anesthetics (general popularity index, GPI) or the subfield of anesthesia monitoring (specific popularity index, SPI); index of change (IC), representing the degree of growth in publications on a topic from one period to the next; and index of expectations (IE), representing the ratio of the number of articles on a topic in the top 20 journals relative to the number of articles in all (>5,000) biomedical journals covered by PubMed. Publications on 33 anesthesia-monitoring topics were assessed. Our analysis showed that over the past 40 years, the rate of rise in the number of articles on anesthesia monitoring was exponential, with an increase of more than eleven-fold, from 296 articles over the 5-year period 1974–1978 to 3,394 articles for 2009–2013. This rise profoundly exceeded the rate of rise of the number of articles on general anesthetics. The difference was especially evident with the comparison of the related GPIs: stable growth of the GPI for anesthesia monitoring vs constant decline in the GPI for general anesthetics. By the 2009–2013 period, among specific monitoring topics introduced after 1980, the SPI index had a meaningful magnitude (≥1.5) in 9 of 24 topics: Bispectral Index (7.8), Transesophageal Echocardiography (4.2), Electromyo­graphy (2.8), Pulse Oximetry (2.4), Entropy (2.3), Train-of-four (2.3), Capnography (1.9), Pulse Contour (1.9), and Electrical Nerve Stimulation for neuromuscular monitoring (1.6). Only one of these topics (Pulse Contour) demonstrated (in 2009–2013) high values for both IC and IE indexes (76 and 16.9, respectively), indicating significant recent progress. We suggest that rapid growth in the field of anesthetic monitoring was one of the most important developments to compensate for the intrinsically low margins of safety of anesthetic agents. Keywords: anesthesia-related morbidity, anesthesia-related mortality, anesthetics, general anesthesia, regional anesthesiahttp://www.dovepress.com/a-quest-to-increase-safety-of-anesthetics-by-advancements-in-anesthesi-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT
spellingShingle Vlassakov KV
Kissin I
A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
title A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis
title_full A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis
title_fullStr A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis
title_short A quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring: scientometric analysis
title_sort quest to increase safety of anesthetics by advancements in anesthesia monitoring scientometric analysis
url http://www.dovepress.com/a-quest-to-increase-safety-of-anesthetics-by-advancements-in-anesthesi-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT
work_keys_str_mv AT vlassakovkv aquesttoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis
AT kissini aquesttoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis
AT vlassakovkv questtoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis
AT kissini questtoincreasesafetyofanestheticsbyadvancementsinanesthesiamonitoringscientometricanalysis