The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation

Objectives: Recent studies have introduced middle ear volume (MEV) as a novel determinant of perforation-induced conductive hearing loss (CHL) in a mechanism driven by trans-tympanic membrane pressure differences. The primary aims of this preliminary report are to: 1) correlate CHL with perforation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David J. Carpenter, Debara L. Tucci, David M. Kaylie, Dennis O. Frank-Ito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Otology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293017300351
_version_ 1811268052898021376
author David J. Carpenter
Debara L. Tucci
David M. Kaylie
Dennis O. Frank-Ito
author_facet David J. Carpenter
Debara L. Tucci
David M. Kaylie
Dennis O. Frank-Ito
author_sort David J. Carpenter
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Recent studies have introduced middle ear volume (MEV) as a novel determinant of perforation-induced conductive hearing loss (CHL) in a mechanism driven by trans-tympanic membrane pressure differences. The primary aims of this preliminary report are to: 1) correlate CHL with perforation size; 2) describe the relationship between CHL and MEV; and 3) compare CHL across a range of cholesteatoma involvement. Design: A retrospective pilot study was performed in 31 subjects with audiometry indicative of conductive hearing loss, temporal bone CT scans, and no prior middle ear surgery. Perforation size and MEV were analyzed with respect to CHL in a cohort of 10 perforated ears with no cholesteatoma. CHLs were compared in 3 groups defined by extent of cholesteatoma involvement. Results: Ears with large and small perforations showed mean ABG values of 32.0 ± 15.7 dB and 16.0 ± 16.4 dB, respectively. A direct relationship was observed between MEV and CHL for ears with large perforations across all frequencies, whereas this relationship for small perforations was frequency-dependent. Finally, a statistically significant increase in CHL was found across ears with increasing cholesteatoma involvement at 1000 Hz (χ2(2) = 9.786, p = 0.008), 2000 Hz (χ2(2) = 8.455, p = 0.015), and 4000 Hz (χ2(2) = 8.253, p = 0.016). Conclusions: These pilot data suggest that greater perforation-induced conductive hearing losses may be associated with larger perforation sizes and cholesteatoma. The correlation between MEV and CHL may require additional study. Keywords: Perforation-induced hearing loss, Conductive hearing loss, Middle ear volume, Three-dimensional volume reconstruction
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:15:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-70762c225f9d46b68af0295407bc4eda
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1672-2930
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:15:08Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Otology
spelling doaj.art-70762c225f9d46b68af0295407bc4eda2022-12-22T03:16:29ZengElsevierJournal of Otology1672-29302017-09-01123125131The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforationDavid J. Carpenter0Debara L. Tucci1David M. Kaylie2Dennis O. Frank-Ito3Division of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Corresponding author. Duke Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Room 3561 – Blue Zone, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Fax: +1 919 681 7949.Division of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USADivision of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USADivision of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Computational Biology & Bioinformatics PhD Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USAObjectives: Recent studies have introduced middle ear volume (MEV) as a novel determinant of perforation-induced conductive hearing loss (CHL) in a mechanism driven by trans-tympanic membrane pressure differences. The primary aims of this preliminary report are to: 1) correlate CHL with perforation size; 2) describe the relationship between CHL and MEV; and 3) compare CHL across a range of cholesteatoma involvement. Design: A retrospective pilot study was performed in 31 subjects with audiometry indicative of conductive hearing loss, temporal bone CT scans, and no prior middle ear surgery. Perforation size and MEV were analyzed with respect to CHL in a cohort of 10 perforated ears with no cholesteatoma. CHLs were compared in 3 groups defined by extent of cholesteatoma involvement. Results: Ears with large and small perforations showed mean ABG values of 32.0 ± 15.7 dB and 16.0 ± 16.4 dB, respectively. A direct relationship was observed between MEV and CHL for ears with large perforations across all frequencies, whereas this relationship for small perforations was frequency-dependent. Finally, a statistically significant increase in CHL was found across ears with increasing cholesteatoma involvement at 1000 Hz (χ2(2) = 9.786, p = 0.008), 2000 Hz (χ2(2) = 8.455, p = 0.015), and 4000 Hz (χ2(2) = 8.253, p = 0.016). Conclusions: These pilot data suggest that greater perforation-induced conductive hearing losses may be associated with larger perforation sizes and cholesteatoma. The correlation between MEV and CHL may require additional study. Keywords: Perforation-induced hearing loss, Conductive hearing loss, Middle ear volume, Three-dimensional volume reconstructionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293017300351
spellingShingle David J. Carpenter
Debara L. Tucci
David M. Kaylie
Dennis O. Frank-Ito
The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
Journal of Otology
title The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_full The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_fullStr The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_full_unstemmed The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_short The anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
title_sort anatomic determinants of conductive hearing loss secondary to tympanic membrane perforation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293017300351
work_keys_str_mv AT davidjcarpenter theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT debaraltucci theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT davidmkaylie theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT dennisofrankito theanatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT davidjcarpenter anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT debaraltucci anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT davidmkaylie anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation
AT dennisofrankito anatomicdeterminantsofconductivehearinglosssecondarytotympanicmembraneperforation