Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness
Purpose: This study's purpose was to examine whether established risk categories of waist circumference (WC)—normal, high risk, and very high health risk—reflected significant differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical activity (PA) level. Methods: CRF was directly measured as...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Sport and Health Science |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254617300479 |
_version_ | 1831684266358996992 |
---|---|
author | Sindre M. Dyrstad Elisabeth Edvardsen Bjørge H. Hansen Sigmund A. Anderssen |
author_facet | Sindre M. Dyrstad Elisabeth Edvardsen Bjørge H. Hansen Sigmund A. Anderssen |
author_sort | Sindre M. Dyrstad |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose: This study's purpose was to examine whether established risk categories of waist circumference (WC)—normal, high risk, and very high health risk—reflected significant differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical activity (PA) level. Methods: CRF was directly measured as maximal oxygen uptake during a progressive graded treadmill test to exhaustion in 722 individuals (349 women) aged 20–85 years. WC was measured between the lower rib and the iliac crest. Objectively measured PA was assessed using an accelerometer. Results: Men in the normal risk group (WC < 94 cm) had a 31% higher CRF and 43% higher level of moderate-to-vigorous PA than men in the very high risk group (with a WC > 102 cm). Corresponding numbers for women within normal (WC < 80 cm) and very high risk group (WC > 88 cm) were 25% and 18% (p < 0.05). There was a high negative correlation between CRF and WC in men (r = −0.68), and a moderate correlation for women (r = −0.49; p < 0.001). For each cm increase in WC, CRF was reduced by 0.48 and 0.27 mL/kg/min in men and women, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The recommended WC thresholds for abdominal obesity reflected significant differences in CRF for both men and women, and could serve as a useful instrument for estimating health-related differences in CRF. Keywords: Abdominal obesity, Fit fat, Maximal oxygen uptake, Obesity, Public health, Waist circumference |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T06:53:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-70b1aadfdacb452b8e72da4c1df3b486 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2095-2546 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T06:53:32Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Sport and Health Science |
spelling | doaj.art-70b1aadfdacb452b8e72da4c1df3b4862022-12-21T19:49:27ZengElsevierJournal of Sport and Health Science2095-25462019-01-01811722Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitnessSindre M. Dyrstad0Elisabeth Edvardsen1Bjørge H. Hansen2Sigmund A. Anderssen3Department of Education and Sport Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger 4036, Norway; Corresponding author.Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo 0806, Norway; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo 0424, NorwayDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo 0806, NorwayDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo 0806, NorwayPurpose: This study's purpose was to examine whether established risk categories of waist circumference (WC)—normal, high risk, and very high health risk—reflected significant differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical activity (PA) level. Methods: CRF was directly measured as maximal oxygen uptake during a progressive graded treadmill test to exhaustion in 722 individuals (349 women) aged 20–85 years. WC was measured between the lower rib and the iliac crest. Objectively measured PA was assessed using an accelerometer. Results: Men in the normal risk group (WC < 94 cm) had a 31% higher CRF and 43% higher level of moderate-to-vigorous PA than men in the very high risk group (with a WC > 102 cm). Corresponding numbers for women within normal (WC < 80 cm) and very high risk group (WC > 88 cm) were 25% and 18% (p < 0.05). There was a high negative correlation between CRF and WC in men (r = −0.68), and a moderate correlation for women (r = −0.49; p < 0.001). For each cm increase in WC, CRF was reduced by 0.48 and 0.27 mL/kg/min in men and women, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The recommended WC thresholds for abdominal obesity reflected significant differences in CRF for both men and women, and could serve as a useful instrument for estimating health-related differences in CRF. Keywords: Abdominal obesity, Fit fat, Maximal oxygen uptake, Obesity, Public health, Waist circumferencehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254617300479 |
spellingShingle | Sindre M. Dyrstad Elisabeth Edvardsen Bjørge H. Hansen Sigmund A. Anderssen Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness Journal of Sport and Health Science |
title | Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_full | Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_fullStr | Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_full_unstemmed | Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_short | Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness |
title_sort | waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254617300479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sindremdyrstad waistcircumferencethresholdsandcardiorespiratoryfitness AT elisabethedvardsen waistcircumferencethresholdsandcardiorespiratoryfitness AT bjørgehhansen waistcircumferencethresholdsandcardiorespiratoryfitness AT sigmundaanderssen waistcircumferencethresholdsandcardiorespiratoryfitness |