Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical Demography
Systematic research on urban-rural variation in demographic behavior is necessary to overcome dichotomous views resulting from studying cities and the countryside separately. After all, a web of interactions facilitating the diffusion of ideas and behavior connects cities and rural areas. That is wh...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Instititute of Social History
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Historical Life Course Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10622/23526343-2018-0009?locatt=view:master |
| _version_ | 1811327495080771584 |
|---|---|
| author | Christa Matthys Jan Kok Richard Paping |
| author_facet | Christa Matthys Jan Kok Richard Paping |
| author_sort | Christa Matthys |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Systematic research on urban-rural variation in demographic behavior is necessary to overcome dichotomous views resulting from studying cities and the countryside separately. After all, a web of interactions facilitating the diffusion of ideas and behavior connects cities and rural areas. That is why it is especially important to study the comportment of migrants moving between urban and rural environments. In line with this argument five case studies are presented in this special issue that use static or dynamic individual-level data to analyze urban-rural demographic differences and life courses of migrants in Europe (Germany, the Netherlands and Scotland), mainly during the nineteenth century. The outcomes show that the places of residence indeed influenced demographic behavior to a considerable extent, although they do not reflect a simple and strict division between cities and rural areas. Rather, demographic behavior was affected by a diversity of local conditions, including various town sizes, calling for a further exploration of the impact of local demographic, working and living conditions. The studies in this issue also warn against simplified views regarding migrants in the past, for instance, their depiction of being of relatively humble social background. For many migrants, their migration was not a definitive break with the place of origin, and they did not assimilate completely to the dominant behavior in their destination. Instead, migrants often remained embedded in and influenced by trans-regional social networks. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:08:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-70b98dd0b784424f8271142799763780 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2352-6343 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:08:54Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | International Instititute of Social History |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Historical Life Course Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-70b98dd0b784424f82711427997637802022-12-22T02:42:05ZengInternational Instititute of Social HistoryHistorical Life Course Studies2352-63432018-04-016110Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical DemographyChrista Matthys0Jan Kok1Richard Paping2Ghent UniversityRadboud University NijmegenUniversity of GroningenSystematic research on urban-rural variation in demographic behavior is necessary to overcome dichotomous views resulting from studying cities and the countryside separately. After all, a web of interactions facilitating the diffusion of ideas and behavior connects cities and rural areas. That is why it is especially important to study the comportment of migrants moving between urban and rural environments. In line with this argument five case studies are presented in this special issue that use static or dynamic individual-level data to analyze urban-rural demographic differences and life courses of migrants in Europe (Germany, the Netherlands and Scotland), mainly during the nineteenth century. The outcomes show that the places of residence indeed influenced demographic behavior to a considerable extent, although they do not reflect a simple and strict division between cities and rural areas. Rather, demographic behavior was affected by a diversity of local conditions, including various town sizes, calling for a further exploration of the impact of local demographic, working and living conditions. The studies in this issue also warn against simplified views regarding migrants in the past, for instance, their depiction of being of relatively humble social background. For many migrants, their migration was not a definitive break with the place of origin, and they did not assimilate completely to the dominant behavior in their destination. Instead, migrants often remained embedded in and influenced by trans-regional social networks.http://hdl.handle.net/10622/23526343-2018-0009?locatt=view:masterUrban-rural differencesHistorical demographyLife coursesMigrationComparative research |
| spellingShingle | Christa Matthys Jan Kok Richard Paping Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical Demography Historical Life Course Studies Urban-rural differences Historical demography Life courses Migration Comparative research |
| title | Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical Demography |
| title_full | Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical Demography |
| title_fullStr | Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical Demography |
| title_full_unstemmed | Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical Demography |
| title_short | Introduction: Urban-Rural Differences in Historical Demography |
| title_sort | introduction urban rural differences in historical demography |
| topic | Urban-rural differences Historical demography Life courses Migration Comparative research |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10622/23526343-2018-0009?locatt=view:master |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christamatthys introductionurbanruraldifferencesinhistoricaldemography AT jankok introductionurbanruraldifferencesinhistoricaldemography AT richardpaping introductionurbanruraldifferencesinhistoricaldemography |