Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner

Objectives: This study describes a means of assessing the external jugular venous pressure (JVP) as an indicator of normal or elevated central venous pressure (CVP).Methods: Intensive care unit patients having CVP monitoring were examined. With patients in bed, the external jugular vein (EJV) was oc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zidulka, Arnold, Sankoff, Jeffrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2008-11-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8c31w58c
_version_ 1817988121095045120
author Zidulka, Arnold
Sankoff, Jeffrey
author_facet Zidulka, Arnold
Sankoff, Jeffrey
author_sort Zidulka, Arnold
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: This study describes a means of assessing the external jugular venous pressure (JVP) as an indicator of normal or elevated central venous pressure (CVP).Methods: Intensive care unit patients having CVP monitoring were examined. With patients in bed, the external jugular vein (EJV) was occluded at the base of the neck and observed to distend. The occlusion was then removed and the vein observed for collapse. Complete collapse was hypothesized to indicate a non-elevated CVP (≤8cm of water). In those patients whose EJV collapsed incompletely, the vein was then occluded with the finger near the angle of the jaw. With the occlusion maintained, the vein was milked downwards with the other hand to cause its emptying and was then observed for filling from below. Filling from below was hypothesized to indicate an elevated CVP (>8cm of water).Results: In 12 of the 40 patients examined, the EJV could not be assessed (EJV not seen at all: 5, and difficult to visualize: 7). For the remaining 28 patients, 11 had a CVP > 8 cm, while 17 had a CVP of < 8. EJV assessment was 100% accurate (95% Confidence Interval 88-100) in predicting whether or not a patient’s CVP was greater or less than 8 cm of water.Conclusion: EJV assessment, when visible, is accurate to clinically assess a patient’s CVP in the hands of the author. Further studies are needed to see if they are reproducible by other observer.[WestJEM. 2008;9:201-205.]
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:30:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-70bface20ca4490c99a9fad769d7a325
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:30:20Z
publishDate 2008-11-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-70bface20ca4490c99a9fad769d7a3252022-12-22T02:22:33ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182008-11-0194201205Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single ExaminerZidulka, ArnoldSankoff, JeffreyObjectives: This study describes a means of assessing the external jugular venous pressure (JVP) as an indicator of normal or elevated central venous pressure (CVP).Methods: Intensive care unit patients having CVP monitoring were examined. With patients in bed, the external jugular vein (EJV) was occluded at the base of the neck and observed to distend. The occlusion was then removed and the vein observed for collapse. Complete collapse was hypothesized to indicate a non-elevated CVP (≤8cm of water). In those patients whose EJV collapsed incompletely, the vein was then occluded with the finger near the angle of the jaw. With the occlusion maintained, the vein was milked downwards with the other hand to cause its emptying and was then observed for filling from below. Filling from below was hypothesized to indicate an elevated CVP (>8cm of water).Results: In 12 of the 40 patients examined, the EJV could not be assessed (EJV not seen at all: 5, and difficult to visualize: 7). For the remaining 28 patients, 11 had a CVP > 8 cm, while 17 had a CVP of < 8. EJV assessment was 100% accurate (95% Confidence Interval 88-100) in predicting whether or not a patient’s CVP was greater or less than 8 cm of water.Conclusion: EJV assessment, when visible, is accurate to clinically assess a patient’s CVP in the hands of the author. Further studies are needed to see if they are reproducible by other observer.[WestJEM. 2008;9:201-205.]http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8c31w58cCVPphysical exam
spellingShingle Zidulka, Arnold
Sankoff, Jeffrey
Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
CVP
physical exam
title Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner
title_full Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner
title_short Non-Invasive Method for the Rapid Assessment of Central Venous Pressure: Description and Validation by a Single Examiner
title_sort non invasive method for the rapid assessment of central venous pressure description and validation by a single examiner
topic CVP
physical exam
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8c31w58c
work_keys_str_mv AT zidulkaarnold noninvasivemethodfortherapidassessmentofcentralvenouspressuredescriptionandvalidationbyasingleexaminer
AT sankoffjeffrey noninvasivemethodfortherapidassessmentofcentralvenouspressuredescriptionandvalidationbyasingleexaminer