Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems.
Tournament theory posits that some organizations are modeled after sports tournaments whereby individuals are incentivized to compete and win against other members of the organization. A persistent criticism of tournament theory is that rank-order success of employees is entirely dependent on non-in...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257389 |
| _version_ | 1798032834974187520 |
|---|---|
| author | George C Banks Christopher E Whelpley Eean R Crawford Ernest H O'Boyle Sven Kepes |
| author_facet | George C Banks Christopher E Whelpley Eean R Crawford Ernest H O'Boyle Sven Kepes |
| author_sort | George C Banks |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Tournament theory posits that some organizations are modeled after sports tournaments whereby individuals are incentivized to compete and win against other members of the organization. A persistent criticism of tournament theory is that rank-order success of employees is entirely dependent on non-interacting or at least non-cooperating entities. To address what part, if any, cooperation plays in competitive tournaments, this study examines the role of social networks in tournament-style promotion and reward systems. Specifically, we seek to identify the importance of social relationships, such as group dissimilarity, initial tie formation, and tie strength in predicting tournament success. Bringing two largely independent research streams together (one focused on cooperation and one framed around competition), we examine how individuals' performance interacts with their social relationships-their social networks-to influence their chances of winning a tournament. Using the Survivor television series, we analyze the behaviors of 535 interacting contestants across 30 tournaments. In general, the findings help to illustrate how performance and social networks predict tournament advancement. Interestingly, we find that group dissimilarity based on gender, race, and age, largely does not play a role in advancement in the tournaments. Further, the strength of ties fails to mediate between variables such as group dissimilarity and initial tie formation. We conclude by discussing future directions for theoretical and practical exploration of tournament-style promotion systems. Recommendations include continuing to explore and test the role of social dynamics in compensation and promotion systems. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:20:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-70c1fe563e594e1b84c67781624b30a5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:20:08Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-70c1fe563e594e1b84c67781624b30a52022-12-22T04:04:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01169e025738910.1371/journal.pone.0257389Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems.George C BanksChristopher E WhelpleyEean R CrawfordErnest H O'BoyleSven KepesTournament theory posits that some organizations are modeled after sports tournaments whereby individuals are incentivized to compete and win against other members of the organization. A persistent criticism of tournament theory is that rank-order success of employees is entirely dependent on non-interacting or at least non-cooperating entities. To address what part, if any, cooperation plays in competitive tournaments, this study examines the role of social networks in tournament-style promotion and reward systems. Specifically, we seek to identify the importance of social relationships, such as group dissimilarity, initial tie formation, and tie strength in predicting tournament success. Bringing two largely independent research streams together (one focused on cooperation and one framed around competition), we examine how individuals' performance interacts with their social relationships-their social networks-to influence their chances of winning a tournament. Using the Survivor television series, we analyze the behaviors of 535 interacting contestants across 30 tournaments. In general, the findings help to illustrate how performance and social networks predict tournament advancement. Interestingly, we find that group dissimilarity based on gender, race, and age, largely does not play a role in advancement in the tournaments. Further, the strength of ties fails to mediate between variables such as group dissimilarity and initial tie formation. We conclude by discussing future directions for theoretical and practical exploration of tournament-style promotion systems. Recommendations include continuing to explore and test the role of social dynamics in compensation and promotion systems.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257389 |
| spellingShingle | George C Banks Christopher E Whelpley Eean R Crawford Ernest H O'Boyle Sven Kepes Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems. PLoS ONE |
| title | Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems. |
| title_full | Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems. |
| title_fullStr | Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems. |
| title_short | Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems. |
| title_sort | getting along to get ahead the role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257389 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT georgecbanks gettingalongtogetaheadtheroleofsocialcontextintournamentpromotionandrewardsystems AT christopherewhelpley gettingalongtogetaheadtheroleofsocialcontextintournamentpromotionandrewardsystems AT eeanrcrawford gettingalongtogetaheadtheroleofsocialcontextintournamentpromotionandrewardsystems AT ernesthoboyle gettingalongtogetaheadtheroleofsocialcontextintournamentpromotionandrewardsystems AT svenkepes gettingalongtogetaheadtheroleofsocialcontextintournamentpromotionandrewardsystems |