A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common predisposing factors for ischemic stroke worldwide. Because of this, patients with AF are prescribed anticoagulant medications to decrease the risk. The availability of different options for oral anticoagulation mak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim Paul de Castro, Harold Henrison Chiu, Ronna Cheska De Leon-Yao, Lorraine Almelor-Sembrana, Antonio Miguel Dans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-08-01
Series:JMIR Cardio
Online Access:https://cardio.jmir.org/2021/2/e23464
_version_ 1797735806797873152
author Kim Paul de Castro
Harold Henrison Chiu
Ronna Cheska De Leon-Yao
Lorraine Almelor-Sembrana
Antonio Miguel Dans
author_facet Kim Paul de Castro
Harold Henrison Chiu
Ronna Cheska De Leon-Yao
Lorraine Almelor-Sembrana
Antonio Miguel Dans
author_sort Kim Paul de Castro
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common predisposing factors for ischemic stroke worldwide. Because of this, patients with AF are prescribed anticoagulant medications to decrease the risk. The availability of different options for oral anticoagulation makes it difficult for some patients to decide a preferred choice of medication. Clinical guidelines often recommend enhancing the decision-making process of patients by increasing their involvement in health decisions. In particular, the use of patient decision aids (PDAs) in patients with AF was associated with increased knowledge and increased likelihood of making a choice. However, the majority of available PDAs are from Western countries. ObjectiveWe aimed to develop and pilot test a PDA to help patients with nonvalvular AF choose an oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in the local setting. Outcomes were (1) reduction in patient decisional conflict, (2) improvement in patient knowledge, and (3) patient and physician acceptability. MethodsWe followed the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) to develop a mobile app–based PDA for anticoagulation therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF. Focus group discussions identified decisional needs, which were subsequently incorporated into the PDA to compare choices for anticoagulation. Based on recommendations, the prototype PDA was rendered by at least 30 patients and 30 physicians. Decisional conflict and patient knowledge were tested before and after the PDA was implemented. Patient acceptability and physician acceptability were measured after each encounter. ResultsAnticoagulant options were compared by the PDA using three factors that were identified (impact on stroke and bleeding risk, and price). The comparisons were presented as tables and graphs. The prototype PDA was rendered by 30 doctors and 37 patients for pilot testing. The mean duration of the encounters was 15 minutes. The decisional conflict score reduced by 35 points (100-point scale; P<.001). The AF knowledge score improved from 10 to 15 (P<.001). The PDA was acceptable for both patients and doctors. ConclusionsOur study showed that an app-based PDA for anticoagulation therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF (1) reduced patient decisional conflict, (2) improved patient knowledge, and (3) was acceptable to patients and physicians. A PDA is potentially acceptable and useful in our setting. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to test its effectiveness compared to usual care. PDAs for other conditions should also be developed.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:04:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-70c5a2f6dd35474ba89aecff07e8cc87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2561-1011
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:04:25Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Cardio
spelling doaj.art-70c5a2f6dd35474ba89aecff07e8cc872023-08-28T18:30:17ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Cardio2561-10112021-08-0152e2346410.2196/23464A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot StudyKim Paul de Castrohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-4408Harold Henrison Chiuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2021-7843Ronna Cheska De Leon-Yaohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6669-3928Lorraine Almelor-Sembranahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1578-7489Antonio Miguel Danshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9694-8757 BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common predisposing factors for ischemic stroke worldwide. Because of this, patients with AF are prescribed anticoagulant medications to decrease the risk. The availability of different options for oral anticoagulation makes it difficult for some patients to decide a preferred choice of medication. Clinical guidelines often recommend enhancing the decision-making process of patients by increasing their involvement in health decisions. In particular, the use of patient decision aids (PDAs) in patients with AF was associated with increased knowledge and increased likelihood of making a choice. However, the majority of available PDAs are from Western countries. ObjectiveWe aimed to develop and pilot test a PDA to help patients with nonvalvular AF choose an oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in the local setting. Outcomes were (1) reduction in patient decisional conflict, (2) improvement in patient knowledge, and (3) patient and physician acceptability. MethodsWe followed the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) to develop a mobile app–based PDA for anticoagulation therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF. Focus group discussions identified decisional needs, which were subsequently incorporated into the PDA to compare choices for anticoagulation. Based on recommendations, the prototype PDA was rendered by at least 30 patients and 30 physicians. Decisional conflict and patient knowledge were tested before and after the PDA was implemented. Patient acceptability and physician acceptability were measured after each encounter. ResultsAnticoagulant options were compared by the PDA using three factors that were identified (impact on stroke and bleeding risk, and price). The comparisons were presented as tables and graphs. The prototype PDA was rendered by 30 doctors and 37 patients for pilot testing. The mean duration of the encounters was 15 minutes. The decisional conflict score reduced by 35 points (100-point scale; P<.001). The AF knowledge score improved from 10 to 15 (P<.001). The PDA was acceptable for both patients and doctors. ConclusionsOur study showed that an app-based PDA for anticoagulation therapy in patients with nonvalvular AF (1) reduced patient decisional conflict, (2) improved patient knowledge, and (3) was acceptable to patients and physicians. A PDA is potentially acceptable and useful in our setting. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to test its effectiveness compared to usual care. PDAs for other conditions should also be developed.https://cardio.jmir.org/2021/2/e23464
spellingShingle Kim Paul de Castro
Harold Henrison Chiu
Ronna Cheska De Leon-Yao
Lorraine Almelor-Sembrana
Antonio Miguel Dans
A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study
JMIR Cardio
title A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study
title_full A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study
title_fullStr A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study
title_short A Patient Decision Aid for Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Development and Pilot Study
title_sort patient decision aid for anticoagulation therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation development and pilot study
url https://cardio.jmir.org/2021/2/e23464
work_keys_str_mv AT kimpauldecastro apatientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT haroldhenrisonchiu apatientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT ronnacheskadeleonyao apatientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT lorrainealmelorsembrana apatientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT antoniomigueldans apatientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT kimpauldecastro patientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT haroldhenrisonchiu patientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT ronnacheskadeleonyao patientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT lorrainealmelorsembrana patientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy
AT antoniomigueldans patientdecisionaidforanticoagulationtherapyinpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationdevelopmentandpilotstudy