The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods

Critical-size bone defects up to 25 cm can be treated successfully using the induced membrane technique established by Masquelet. To shorten this procedure, human acellular dermis (HAD) has had success in replacing this membrane in rat models. The aim of this study was to compare bone healing for sm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Kammerer, Frederik Alexander Hartmann, Christoph Nau, Maximilian Leiblein, Alexander Schaible, Jonas Neijhoft, Dirk Henrich, René Verboket, Maren Janko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-03-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/3/287
_version_ 1797242006156607488
author Andreas Kammerer
Frederik Alexander Hartmann
Christoph Nau
Maximilian Leiblein
Alexander Schaible
Jonas Neijhoft
Dirk Henrich
René Verboket
Maren Janko
author_facet Andreas Kammerer
Frederik Alexander Hartmann
Christoph Nau
Maximilian Leiblein
Alexander Schaible
Jonas Neijhoft
Dirk Henrich
René Verboket
Maren Janko
author_sort Andreas Kammerer
collection DOAJ
description Critical-size bone defects up to 25 cm can be treated successfully using the induced membrane technique established by Masquelet. To shorten this procedure, human acellular dermis (HAD) has had success in replacing this membrane in rat models. The aim of this study was to compare bone healing for smaller and larger defects using an induced membrane and HAD in a rat model. Using our established femoral defect model in rats, the animals were placed into four groups and defects of 5 mm or 10 mm size were set, either filling them with autologous spongiosa and surrounding the defect with HAD or waiting for the induced membrane to form around a cement spacer and filling this cavity in a second operation with a cancellous bone graft. Healing was assessed eight weeks after the operation using µ-CT, histological staining, and an assessment of the progress of bone formation using an established bone healing score. The α-smooth muscle actin used as a signal of blood vessel formation was stained and counted. The 5 mm defects showed significantly better bone union and a higher bone healing score than the 10 mm defects. HAD being used for the smaller defects resulted in a significantly higher bone healing score even than for the induced membrane and significantly higher blood vessel formation, corroborating the good results achieved by using HAD in previous studies. In comparison, same-sized groups showed significant differences in bone healing as well as blood vessel formation, suggesting that 5 mm defects are large enough to show different results in healing depending on treatment; therefore, 5 mm is a viable size for further studies on bone healing.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:32:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-70cda01ec11b41a89b751d73800c541c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-5354
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:32:21Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj.art-70cda01ec11b41a89b751d73800c541c2024-03-27T13:21:59ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542024-03-0111328710.3390/bioengineering11030287The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment MethodsAndreas Kammerer0Frederik Alexander Hartmann1Christoph Nau2Maximilian Leiblein3Alexander Schaible4Jonas Neijhoft5Dirk Henrich6René Verboket7Maren Janko8Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyCritical-size bone defects up to 25 cm can be treated successfully using the induced membrane technique established by Masquelet. To shorten this procedure, human acellular dermis (HAD) has had success in replacing this membrane in rat models. The aim of this study was to compare bone healing for smaller and larger defects using an induced membrane and HAD in a rat model. Using our established femoral defect model in rats, the animals were placed into four groups and defects of 5 mm or 10 mm size were set, either filling them with autologous spongiosa and surrounding the defect with HAD or waiting for the induced membrane to form around a cement spacer and filling this cavity in a second operation with a cancellous bone graft. Healing was assessed eight weeks after the operation using µ-CT, histological staining, and an assessment of the progress of bone formation using an established bone healing score. The α-smooth muscle actin used as a signal of blood vessel formation was stained and counted. The 5 mm defects showed significantly better bone union and a higher bone healing score than the 10 mm defects. HAD being used for the smaller defects resulted in a significantly higher bone healing score even than for the induced membrane and significantly higher blood vessel formation, corroborating the good results achieved by using HAD in previous studies. In comparison, same-sized groups showed significant differences in bone healing as well as blood vessel formation, suggesting that 5 mm defects are large enough to show different results in healing depending on treatment; therefore, 5 mm is a viable size for further studies on bone healing.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/3/287critical-size defectbone healinginduced membraneMasqueletEpiflex<sup>®</sup>human acellular dermis (HAD)
spellingShingle Andreas Kammerer
Frederik Alexander Hartmann
Christoph Nau
Maximilian Leiblein
Alexander Schaible
Jonas Neijhoft
Dirk Henrich
René Verboket
Maren Janko
The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods
Bioengineering
critical-size defect
bone healing
induced membrane
Masquelet
Epiflex<sup>®</sup>
human acellular dermis (HAD)
title The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods
title_full The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods
title_fullStr The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods
title_short The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods
title_sort impact of defect size on bone healing in critical size bone defects investigated on a rat femur defect model comparing two treatment methods
topic critical-size defect
bone healing
induced membrane
Masquelet
Epiflex<sup>®</sup>
human acellular dermis (HAD)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/3/287
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaskammerer theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT frederikalexanderhartmann theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT christophnau theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT maximilianleiblein theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT alexanderschaible theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT jonasneijhoft theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT dirkhenrich theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT reneverboket theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT marenjanko theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT andreaskammerer impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT frederikalexanderhartmann impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT christophnau impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT maximilianleiblein impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT alexanderschaible impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT jonasneijhoft impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT dirkhenrich impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT reneverboket impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods
AT marenjanko impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods