The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods
Critical-size bone defects up to 25 cm can be treated successfully using the induced membrane technique established by Masquelet. To shorten this procedure, human acellular dermis (HAD) has had success in replacing this membrane in rat models. The aim of this study was to compare bone healing for sm...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Bioengineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/3/287 |
_version_ | 1797242006156607488 |
---|---|
author | Andreas Kammerer Frederik Alexander Hartmann Christoph Nau Maximilian Leiblein Alexander Schaible Jonas Neijhoft Dirk Henrich René Verboket Maren Janko |
author_facet | Andreas Kammerer Frederik Alexander Hartmann Christoph Nau Maximilian Leiblein Alexander Schaible Jonas Neijhoft Dirk Henrich René Verboket Maren Janko |
author_sort | Andreas Kammerer |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Critical-size bone defects up to 25 cm can be treated successfully using the induced membrane technique established by Masquelet. To shorten this procedure, human acellular dermis (HAD) has had success in replacing this membrane in rat models. The aim of this study was to compare bone healing for smaller and larger defects using an induced membrane and HAD in a rat model. Using our established femoral defect model in rats, the animals were placed into four groups and defects of 5 mm or 10 mm size were set, either filling them with autologous spongiosa and surrounding the defect with HAD or waiting for the induced membrane to form around a cement spacer and filling this cavity in a second operation with a cancellous bone graft. Healing was assessed eight weeks after the operation using µ-CT, histological staining, and an assessment of the progress of bone formation using an established bone healing score. The α-smooth muscle actin used as a signal of blood vessel formation was stained and counted. The 5 mm defects showed significantly better bone union and a higher bone healing score than the 10 mm defects. HAD being used for the smaller defects resulted in a significantly higher bone healing score even than for the induced membrane and significantly higher blood vessel formation, corroborating the good results achieved by using HAD in previous studies. In comparison, same-sized groups showed significant differences in bone healing as well as blood vessel formation, suggesting that 5 mm defects are large enough to show different results in healing depending on treatment; therefore, 5 mm is a viable size for further studies on bone healing. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:32:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-70cda01ec11b41a89b751d73800c541c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2306-5354 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:32:21Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Bioengineering |
spelling | doaj.art-70cda01ec11b41a89b751d73800c541c2024-03-27T13:21:59ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542024-03-0111328710.3390/bioengineering11030287The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment MethodsAndreas Kammerer0Frederik Alexander Hartmann1Christoph Nau2Maximilian Leiblein3Alexander Schaible4Jonas Neijhoft5Dirk Henrich6René Verboket7Maren Janko8Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt, GermanyCritical-size bone defects up to 25 cm can be treated successfully using the induced membrane technique established by Masquelet. To shorten this procedure, human acellular dermis (HAD) has had success in replacing this membrane in rat models. The aim of this study was to compare bone healing for smaller and larger defects using an induced membrane and HAD in a rat model. Using our established femoral defect model in rats, the animals were placed into four groups and defects of 5 mm or 10 mm size were set, either filling them with autologous spongiosa and surrounding the defect with HAD or waiting for the induced membrane to form around a cement spacer and filling this cavity in a second operation with a cancellous bone graft. Healing was assessed eight weeks after the operation using µ-CT, histological staining, and an assessment of the progress of bone formation using an established bone healing score. The α-smooth muscle actin used as a signal of blood vessel formation was stained and counted. The 5 mm defects showed significantly better bone union and a higher bone healing score than the 10 mm defects. HAD being used for the smaller defects resulted in a significantly higher bone healing score even than for the induced membrane and significantly higher blood vessel formation, corroborating the good results achieved by using HAD in previous studies. In comparison, same-sized groups showed significant differences in bone healing as well as blood vessel formation, suggesting that 5 mm defects are large enough to show different results in healing depending on treatment; therefore, 5 mm is a viable size for further studies on bone healing.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/3/287critical-size defectbone healinginduced membraneMasqueletEpiflex<sup>®</sup>human acellular dermis (HAD) |
spellingShingle | Andreas Kammerer Frederik Alexander Hartmann Christoph Nau Maximilian Leiblein Alexander Schaible Jonas Neijhoft Dirk Henrich René Verboket Maren Janko The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods Bioengineering critical-size defect bone healing induced membrane Masquelet Epiflex<sup>®</sup> human acellular dermis (HAD) |
title | The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods |
title_full | The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods |
title_short | The Impact of Defect Size on Bone Healing in Critical-Size Bone Defects Investigated on a Rat Femur Defect Model Comparing Two Treatment Methods |
title_sort | impact of defect size on bone healing in critical size bone defects investigated on a rat femur defect model comparing two treatment methods |
topic | critical-size defect bone healing induced membrane Masquelet Epiflex<sup>®</sup> human acellular dermis (HAD) |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/11/3/287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreaskammerer theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT frederikalexanderhartmann theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT christophnau theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT maximilianleiblein theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT alexanderschaible theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT jonasneijhoft theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT dirkhenrich theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT reneverboket theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT marenjanko theimpactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT andreaskammerer impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT frederikalexanderhartmann impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT christophnau impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT maximilianleiblein impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT alexanderschaible impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT jonasneijhoft impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT dirkhenrich impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT reneverboket impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods AT marenjanko impactofdefectsizeonbonehealingincriticalsizebonedefectsinvestigatedonaratfemurdefectmodelcomparingtwotreatmentmethods |