Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional Trial
Objective: To validate GATHER-1 inclusion criteria and the study’s primary anatomic end point by assessing the reproducibility of geographic atrophy (GA) measurements and factors that affect reproducibility. Design: Post hoc analysis of phase II/III clinical trial. Subjects: All 286 participants inc...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Ophthalmology Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452300115X |
| _version_ | 1797260277813608448 |
|---|---|
| author | Angela S. Li, MD Justin Myers, BS Sandra S. Stinnett, DrPH Dilraj S. Grewal, MD Glenn J. Jaffe, MD |
| author_facet | Angela S. Li, MD Justin Myers, BS Sandra S. Stinnett, DrPH Dilraj S. Grewal, MD Glenn J. Jaffe, MD |
| author_sort | Angela S. Li, MD |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: To validate GATHER-1 inclusion criteria and the study’s primary anatomic end point by assessing the reproducibility of geographic atrophy (GA) measurements and factors that affect reproducibility. Design: Post hoc analysis of phase II/III clinical trial. Subjects: All 286 participants included in the GATHER-1 study. Methods: For each subject, blue-light fundus autofluorescence (FAF), color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiograms, and OCT scans were obtained on the study eye and fellow eye. Geographic atrophy area and other lesion characteristics were independently graded by 2 experienced primary readers. If the 2 readers differed on gradeability, GA area (> 10%) or other lesion characteristics, the image was graded by an arbitrator whose measurement or characterization was the final grade. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were gradeability and reproducibility of FAF imaging data. Imaging data included lesion area, confluence of GA with peripapillary atrophy (PPA), whether GA involved the foveal centerpoint, and type of hyperautofluorescence pattern. Results: A total of 2004 images (1002 visits, 286 participants) were analyzed. Gradeability (90.5%) and interreader gradeability concordance (90.2%) were high across all visits. Study eye images were more gradable compared with fellow-eye images. A greater proportion of smaller lesions required arbitration, but interreader reproducibility was consistently high for all images. There was no difference in gradeability, gradeability concordance, or lesion-area concordance for images with PPA-confluent GA compared with those with nonconfluent PPA. Foveal centerpoint-involving lesions had lower gradeability and lesion-area concordance. Images with diffuse patterns of hyperautofluorescence had better gradeability and gradeability concordance than those with nondiffuse patterns but had no difference in lesion-area or lesion-area concordance. Conclusions: There is high gradeability and excellent reproducibility measures across all images. These data support the validity of conclusions from GATHER-1 and the chosen inclusion criteria and end point. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T18:07:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-70daaec21c4845cb9c6e4f0485d49e84 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2666-9145 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T23:22:46Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ophthalmology Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-70daaec21c4845cb9c6e4f0485d49e842024-03-16T05:09:43ZengElsevierOphthalmology Science2666-91452024-03-0142100383Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional TrialAngela S. Li, MD0Justin Myers, BS1Sandra S. Stinnett, DrPH2Dilraj S. Grewal, MD3Glenn J. Jaffe, MD4Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North CarolinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North CarolinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North CarolinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North CarolinaCorrespondence: Glenn J. Jaffe, MD, 2351 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705.; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North CarolinaObjective: To validate GATHER-1 inclusion criteria and the study’s primary anatomic end point by assessing the reproducibility of geographic atrophy (GA) measurements and factors that affect reproducibility. Design: Post hoc analysis of phase II/III clinical trial. Subjects: All 286 participants included in the GATHER-1 study. Methods: For each subject, blue-light fundus autofluorescence (FAF), color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiograms, and OCT scans were obtained on the study eye and fellow eye. Geographic atrophy area and other lesion characteristics were independently graded by 2 experienced primary readers. If the 2 readers differed on gradeability, GA area (> 10%) or other lesion characteristics, the image was graded by an arbitrator whose measurement or characterization was the final grade. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were gradeability and reproducibility of FAF imaging data. Imaging data included lesion area, confluence of GA with peripapillary atrophy (PPA), whether GA involved the foveal centerpoint, and type of hyperautofluorescence pattern. Results: A total of 2004 images (1002 visits, 286 participants) were analyzed. Gradeability (90.5%) and interreader gradeability concordance (90.2%) were high across all visits. Study eye images were more gradable compared with fellow-eye images. A greater proportion of smaller lesions required arbitration, but interreader reproducibility was consistently high for all images. There was no difference in gradeability, gradeability concordance, or lesion-area concordance for images with PPA-confluent GA compared with those with nonconfluent PPA. Foveal centerpoint-involving lesions had lower gradeability and lesion-area concordance. Images with diffuse patterns of hyperautofluorescence had better gradeability and gradeability concordance than those with nondiffuse patterns but had no difference in lesion-area or lesion-area concordance. Conclusions: There is high gradeability and excellent reproducibility measures across all images. These data support the validity of conclusions from GATHER-1 and the chosen inclusion criteria and end point. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452300115XGeographic atrophy measurementGATHER-1 |
| spellingShingle | Angela S. Li, MD Justin Myers, BS Sandra S. Stinnett, DrPH Dilraj S. Grewal, MD Glenn J. Jaffe, MD Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional Trial Ophthalmology Science Geographic atrophy measurement GATHER-1 |
| title | Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional Trial |
| title_full | Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional Trial |
| title_fullStr | Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional Trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional Trial |
| title_short | Gradeability and Reproducibility of Geographic Atrophy Measurement in GATHER-1, a Phase II/III Randomized Interventional Trial |
| title_sort | gradeability and reproducibility of geographic atrophy measurement in gather 1 a phase ii iii randomized interventional trial |
| topic | Geographic atrophy measurement GATHER-1 |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452300115X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT angelaslimd gradeabilityandreproducibilityofgeographicatrophymeasurementingather1aphaseiiiiirandomizedinterventionaltrial AT justinmyersbs gradeabilityandreproducibilityofgeographicatrophymeasurementingather1aphaseiiiiirandomizedinterventionaltrial AT sandrasstinnettdrph gradeabilityandreproducibilityofgeographicatrophymeasurementingather1aphaseiiiiirandomizedinterventionaltrial AT dilrajsgrewalmd gradeabilityandreproducibilityofgeographicatrophymeasurementingather1aphaseiiiiirandomizedinterventionaltrial AT glennjjaffemd gradeabilityandreproducibilityofgeographicatrophymeasurementingather1aphaseiiiiirandomizedinterventionaltrial |