Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks

We are currently witnessing the emergence of new forms of collective identities and a redefinition of the old ones through networked digital interactions, and these can be explicitly measured and analyzed. We distinguish between three major trends on the development of the concept of identity in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xabier E. Barandiaran, Antonio Calleja-López, Emanuele Cozzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01549/full
_version_ 1819085183954976768
author Xabier E. Barandiaran
Xabier E. Barandiaran
Antonio Calleja-López
Antonio Calleja-López
Emanuele Cozzo
Emanuele Cozzo
Emanuele Cozzo
author_facet Xabier E. Barandiaran
Xabier E. Barandiaran
Antonio Calleja-López
Antonio Calleja-López
Emanuele Cozzo
Emanuele Cozzo
Emanuele Cozzo
author_sort Xabier E. Barandiaran
collection DOAJ
description We are currently witnessing the emergence of new forms of collective identities and a redefinition of the old ones through networked digital interactions, and these can be explicitly measured and analyzed. We distinguish between three major trends on the development of the concept of identity in the social realm: (1) an essentialist sense (based on conditions and properties shared by members of a group), (2) a representational or ideational sense (based on the application of categories by oneself or others), and (3) a relational and interactional sense (based on interaction processes between actors and their environments). The interactional approach aligns with current empirical and methodological progress in social network analysis. Moreover, it has been argued that, within the network society, the notion of collective identity (Melucci, 1995) in the political field must be rethought as technologically mediated and interactive. We suggest that collective identities should be understood as recurrent, cohesive, and coordinated communicative interaction networks. We here propose that such identities can be depicted by: (a) mapping and filtering a relevant interaction network, (b) delimiting a set of communities, (c) determining the strongly connected component(s) of such communities (the core identity) in a directed graph, and (d) defining the identity audiences and sources within the community. This technical graph–theoretical characterization is explained and justified in detail through a toy model and applied to three empirical case studies to characterize political identities in party politics (communicative interaction in Twitter during the Spanish elections in 2018), contentious politics in confrontation (in Twitter during the Catalan strike for independence 2019), and the multitudinous identity of Spanish Indignados/15 social movement (in Facebook fan pages 2011). We discuss how the proposed definition is useful to delimit and characterize the internal structure of collective identities in technopolitical interaction networks, and we suggest how the proposed methods can be improved and complemented with other approaches. We finally draw the theoretical implications of understanding collective identities as emerging from interaction networks in a progressive platformization of social interactions in a digital world.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T21:00:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-70dbd447cfba46aa91f0b67245b24e63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T21:00:19Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-70dbd447cfba46aa91f0b67245b24e632022-12-21T18:50:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-07-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01549520104Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction NetworksXabier E. Barandiaran0Xabier E. Barandiaran1Antonio Calleja-López2Antonio Calleja-López3Emanuele Cozzo4Emanuele Cozzo5Emanuele Cozzo6IAS-Research Centre for Life, Mind, and Society, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Labour Relations and Social Work, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria-Gasteiz, SpainDecidim Research, Laboratori d’Innovació Democratica, Barcelona, SpainDecidim Research, Laboratori d’Innovació Democratica, Barcelona, SpainInternet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, SpainDecidim Research, Laboratori d’Innovació Democratica, Barcelona, SpainInternet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, SpainInstitute of Complex Systems (UBICS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainWe are currently witnessing the emergence of new forms of collective identities and a redefinition of the old ones through networked digital interactions, and these can be explicitly measured and analyzed. We distinguish between three major trends on the development of the concept of identity in the social realm: (1) an essentialist sense (based on conditions and properties shared by members of a group), (2) a representational or ideational sense (based on the application of categories by oneself or others), and (3) a relational and interactional sense (based on interaction processes between actors and their environments). The interactional approach aligns with current empirical and methodological progress in social network analysis. Moreover, it has been argued that, within the network society, the notion of collective identity (Melucci, 1995) in the political field must be rethought as technologically mediated and interactive. We suggest that collective identities should be understood as recurrent, cohesive, and coordinated communicative interaction networks. We here propose that such identities can be depicted by: (a) mapping and filtering a relevant interaction network, (b) delimiting a set of communities, (c) determining the strongly connected component(s) of such communities (the core identity) in a directed graph, and (d) defining the identity audiences and sources within the community. This technical graph–theoretical characterization is explained and justified in detail through a toy model and applied to three empirical case studies to characterize political identities in party politics (communicative interaction in Twitter during the Spanish elections in 2018), contentious politics in confrontation (in Twitter during the Catalan strike for independence 2019), and the multitudinous identity of Spanish Indignados/15 social movement (in Facebook fan pages 2011). We discuss how the proposed definition is useful to delimit and characterize the internal structure of collective identities in technopolitical interaction networks, and we suggest how the proposed methods can be improved and complemented with other approaches. We finally draw the theoretical implications of understanding collective identities as emerging from interaction networks in a progressive platformization of social interactions in a digital world.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01549/fullcollective identitysocial identitysocial interactiondigital networkssocial network analysistechnopolitics
spellingShingle Xabier E. Barandiaran
Xabier E. Barandiaran
Antonio Calleja-López
Antonio Calleja-López
Emanuele Cozzo
Emanuele Cozzo
Emanuele Cozzo
Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
Frontiers in Psychology
collective identity
social identity
social interaction
digital networks
social network analysis
technopolitics
title Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_full Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_fullStr Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_full_unstemmed Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_short Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_sort defining collective identities in technopolitical interaction networks
topic collective identity
social identity
social interaction
digital networks
social network analysis
technopolitics
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01549/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xabierebarandiaran definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT xabierebarandiaran definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT antoniocallejalopez definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT antoniocallejalopez definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT emanuelecozzo definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT emanuelecozzo definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT emanuelecozzo definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks