Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditions

Extreme environments are aggressive for concrete structures, hence a performance-based design is crucial to guarantee the durability during the service life. Nonetheless, there is a knowledge gap regarding the influence of cracks on standard and self-healing concrete. This research focuses on monito...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cappellesso Vanessa G., Van Mullem Tim, Gruyaert Elke, Van Tittelboom Kim, De Belie Nele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2023/05/matecconf_smartincs2023_08005.pdf
_version_ 1827955673401393152
author Cappellesso Vanessa G.
Van Mullem Tim
Gruyaert Elke
Van Tittelboom Kim
De Belie Nele
author_facet Cappellesso Vanessa G.
Van Mullem Tim
Gruyaert Elke
Van Tittelboom Kim
De Belie Nele
author_sort Cappellesso Vanessa G.
collection DOAJ
description Extreme environments are aggressive for concrete structures, hence a performance-based design is crucial to guarantee the durability during the service life. Nonetheless, there is a knowledge gap regarding the influence of cracks on standard and self-healing concrete. This research focuses on monitoring cracked self-healing concrete with two commercial healing agents: a bacteria-based healing agent (BAS) and a crystalline admixture (CA). After crack formation and a healing process of three months in wet/dry conditions (4 days/3 days), several extreme conditions were considered: (1) submerged in artificial seawater, (2) submerged in a solution with 33 g/L sodium chloride and (3) freeze-thaw (FT) cycling with de-icing salts. Microscopic images were used to quantify the healing efficiency of the two different healing agents, while chloride ingress and scaling were measured to determine durability. The results of the microscopic measurements indicated significant healing efficiency for both healing agents after the healing regime reaching 72% for CA, and 67% for BAS. After exposure to a marine environment, this efficiency increased to 95% and 92%, respectively. The uncracked BAS samples achieved a scaling reduction of 93% under FT exposure relative to the uncracked REF samples, while this was 49% for the CA samples. In cracked samples, scaling was reduced by 50% for BAS and 24% for CA, relative to the cracked REF samples. In all tested conditions, the BAS samples partially prevented the chloride ingress through the crack, while CA samples showed a great reduction. Overall, both healing agents reduced the degradation and could decrease the chloride ingress.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T14:50:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-70e0a565ab4840dcb221bd210f9fc7fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2261-236X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T14:50:59Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series MATEC Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-70e0a565ab4840dcb221bd210f9fc7fc2023-05-02T09:34:12ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2023-01-013780800510.1051/matecconf/202337808005matecconf_smartincs2023_08005Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditionsCappellesso Vanessa G.0Van Mullem Tim1Gruyaert Elke2Van Tittelboom Kim3De Belie Nele4Ghent University, Department of Structural Engineering and Building MaterialsGhent University, Department of Structural Engineering and Building MaterialsKU Leuven, Department of Civil Engineering, Materials and Constructions, Ghent Technology CampusGhent University, Department of Structural Engineering and Building MaterialsGhent University, Department of Structural Engineering and Building MaterialsExtreme environments are aggressive for concrete structures, hence a performance-based design is crucial to guarantee the durability during the service life. Nonetheless, there is a knowledge gap regarding the influence of cracks on standard and self-healing concrete. This research focuses on monitoring cracked self-healing concrete with two commercial healing agents: a bacteria-based healing agent (BAS) and a crystalline admixture (CA). After crack formation and a healing process of three months in wet/dry conditions (4 days/3 days), several extreme conditions were considered: (1) submerged in artificial seawater, (2) submerged in a solution with 33 g/L sodium chloride and (3) freeze-thaw (FT) cycling with de-icing salts. Microscopic images were used to quantify the healing efficiency of the two different healing agents, while chloride ingress and scaling were measured to determine durability. The results of the microscopic measurements indicated significant healing efficiency for both healing agents after the healing regime reaching 72% for CA, and 67% for BAS. After exposure to a marine environment, this efficiency increased to 95% and 92%, respectively. The uncracked BAS samples achieved a scaling reduction of 93% under FT exposure relative to the uncracked REF samples, while this was 49% for the CA samples. In cracked samples, scaling was reduced by 50% for BAS and 24% for CA, relative to the cracked REF samples. In all tested conditions, the BAS samples partially prevented the chloride ingress through the crack, while CA samples showed a great reduction. Overall, both healing agents reduced the degradation and could decrease the chloride ingress.https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2023/05/matecconf_smartincs2023_08005.pdf
spellingShingle Cappellesso Vanessa G.
Van Mullem Tim
Gruyaert Elke
Van Tittelboom Kim
De Belie Nele
Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditions
MATEC Web of Conferences
title Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditions
title_full Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditions
title_fullStr Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditions
title_short Comparison of different types of self-healing concrete under extreme conditions
title_sort comparison of different types of self healing concrete under extreme conditions
url https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2023/05/matecconf_smartincs2023_08005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cappellessovanessag comparisonofdifferenttypesofselfhealingconcreteunderextremeconditions
AT vanmullemtim comparisonofdifferenttypesofselfhealingconcreteunderextremeconditions
AT gruyaertelke comparisonofdifferenttypesofselfhealingconcreteunderextremeconditions
AT vantittelboomkim comparisonofdifferenttypesofselfhealingconcreteunderextremeconditions
AT debelienele comparisonofdifferenttypesofselfhealingconcreteunderextremeconditions