Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic?
Since the Enlightenment, early medieval lists have been removed from their original manuscript contexts and sometimes interpreted as artefacts of royal and ecclesiastical bureaucracy. Despite critical engagement with the idea of early medieval bureaucracy and recent emphasis on the material and lit...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
StudienVerlag
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/7318 |
| _version_ | 1818548015445573632 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Pickles |
| author_facet | Thomas Pickles |
| author_sort | Thomas Pickles |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Since the Enlightenment, early medieval lists have been removed from their original manuscript contexts and sometimes interpreted as artefacts of royal and ecclesiastical bureaucracy. Despite critical engagement with the idea of early medieval bureaucracy and recent emphasis on the material and literary characteristics of lists, the idea of bureaucratic origins remains. This paper focuses on the Whitby Abbot’s Book, folios 1r–4v, a perhaps incomplete quire written after 1176, comprising a book list, a story of refoundation with accompanying property lists, an abbatial oath, and a story of abbatial elections including a list of monks. It uses approaches to bureaucracy, administrative history, and memory to reflect on this case study and on cultures of listing.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:14:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-70e38b3441424151b5d8eb5bfc7dff89 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1016-765X 2707-966X |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:14:20Z |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | StudienVerlag |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften |
| spelling | doaj.art-70e38b3441424151b5d8eb5bfc7dff892022-12-22T00:31:40ZdeuStudienVerlagÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften1016-765X2707-966X2022-05-0132310.25365/oezg-2021-32-3-4Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic?Thomas Pickles0Department of History and Archaeology, University of Chester, UK Since the Enlightenment, early medieval lists have been removed from their original manuscript contexts and sometimes interpreted as artefacts of royal and ecclesiastical bureaucracy. Despite critical engagement with the idea of early medieval bureaucracy and recent emphasis on the material and literary characteristics of lists, the idea of bureaucratic origins remains. This paper focuses on the Whitby Abbot’s Book, folios 1r–4v, a perhaps incomplete quire written after 1176, comprising a book list, a story of refoundation with accompanying property lists, an abbatial oath, and a story of abbatial elections including a list of monks. It uses approaches to bureaucracy, administrative history, and memory to reflect on this case study and on cultures of listing. https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/7318medievallistsmonasterybureaucracymemory |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Pickles Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic? Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften medieval lists monastery bureaucracy memory |
| title | Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic? |
| title_full | Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic? |
| title_fullStr | Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic? |
| title_short | Were Early Medieval Lists Bureaucratic? |
| title_sort | were early medieval lists bureaucratic |
| topic | medieval lists monastery bureaucracy memory |
| url | https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/7318 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomaspickles wereearlymedievallistsbureaucratic |