“Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s State

To address the question of the nature of modern state in the contemporary Iran, the present paper seeks to investigate the issue of state in the contemporary Iran in terms of Foucauldian approach and the conceptual apparatus driven from it. In his late intellectual career, Michael Foucault introduce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hamid yahyavi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2017-09-01
Series:دولت‌پژوهی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_7828_1e9ba6d5d204e74a9b86212a936412fb.pdf
_version_ 1797386178027061248
author Hamid yahyavi
author_facet Hamid yahyavi
author_sort Hamid yahyavi
collection DOAJ
description To address the question of the nature of modern state in the contemporary Iran, the present paper seeks to investigate the issue of state in the contemporary Iran in terms of Foucauldian approach and the conceptual apparatus driven from it. In his late intellectual career, Michael Foucault introduced a new field into the researches on state in which fundamentally the rationalities underpinning / constituting the state are zeroed in on. The present paper hypothesizes that the drawing, organization and articulation of the modern state in Iran were being done by the governmentality of the pastorship prevailing over the tradition system and the rationalities remained out of the episteme belonged to Iranian previous universe, though it was built in the course of modernization process stimulated by Iranians` encounter with some western forms of governance. The present paper maintains that the tenacity of “the pastorship rationalities of the tradition system” and their being strengthened due to combining with some imperfect rationalities driven from modern era – that is, the rationalities oriented to consolidate the state such as “raison d'état” and “police” – lead to the generation of an “instrumental pastorship” equipped with modern technics and apparatus. Thus, it provided grounds for raising a particular political order which the present paper calls “neo-pastorship”. “Neo-pastorship”, thanks to the modern apparatuses, such as the army or the bureaucracy that was developed in the new age, came to more success in interference and carving power on the body of society.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:05:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-70f21bc6209a4bc59e375e55a383bbac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2476-2806
2476-6828
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:05:16Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
record_format Article
series دولت‌پژوهی
spelling doaj.art-70f21bc6209a4bc59e375e55a383bbac2023-12-19T10:28:45ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressدولت‌پژوهی2476-28062476-68282017-09-0131013210.22054/tssq.2017.15351.2317828“Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s StateHamid yahyavi0Assistant Professor, Department of Political science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, IranTo address the question of the nature of modern state in the contemporary Iran, the present paper seeks to investigate the issue of state in the contemporary Iran in terms of Foucauldian approach and the conceptual apparatus driven from it. In his late intellectual career, Michael Foucault introduced a new field into the researches on state in which fundamentally the rationalities underpinning / constituting the state are zeroed in on. The present paper hypothesizes that the drawing, organization and articulation of the modern state in Iran were being done by the governmentality of the pastorship prevailing over the tradition system and the rationalities remained out of the episteme belonged to Iranian previous universe, though it was built in the course of modernization process stimulated by Iranians` encounter with some western forms of governance. The present paper maintains that the tenacity of “the pastorship rationalities of the tradition system” and their being strengthened due to combining with some imperfect rationalities driven from modern era – that is, the rationalities oriented to consolidate the state such as “raison d'état” and “police” – lead to the generation of an “instrumental pastorship” equipped with modern technics and apparatus. Thus, it provided grounds for raising a particular political order which the present paper calls “neo-pastorship”. “Neo-pastorship”, thanks to the modern apparatuses, such as the army or the bureaucracy that was developed in the new age, came to more success in interference and carving power on the body of society.https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_7828_1e9ba6d5d204e74a9b86212a936412fb.pdfneo-pastorshipgovernmental rationalityiranian state
spellingShingle Hamid yahyavi
“Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s State
دولت‌پژوهی
neo-pastorship
governmental rationality
iranian state
title “Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s State
title_full “Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s State
title_fullStr “Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s State
title_full_unstemmed “Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s State
title_short “Neo-pastorship”, Critique of Governmental Rationality of Iran’s State
title_sort neo pastorship critique of governmental rationality of iran s state
topic neo-pastorship
governmental rationality
iranian state
url https://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_7828_1e9ba6d5d204e74a9b86212a936412fb.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidyahyavi neopastorshipcritiqueofgovernmentalrationalityofiransstate