Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Children have reported that one reason for participating in research is to help their doctor. This is potentially harmful if associated with coercive consent but might be beneficial for recruitment. We aimed to explore children’s perceptions of the child-doctor relationship in re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malou L. Luchtenberg, Els L. M. Maeckelberghe, Louise Locock, A. A. Eduard Verhagen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12887-020-02243-1
_version_ 1818342466010480640
author Malou L. Luchtenberg
Els L. M. Maeckelberghe
Louise Locock
A. A. Eduard Verhagen
author_facet Malou L. Luchtenberg
Els L. M. Maeckelberghe
Louise Locock
A. A. Eduard Verhagen
author_sort Malou L. Luchtenberg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Children have reported that one reason for participating in research is to help their doctor. This is potentially harmful if associated with coercive consent but might be beneficial for recruitment. We aimed to explore children’s perceptions of the child-doctor relationship in research. Methods This is a multicenter qualitative study with semi structured interviews performed between 2010 and 2011 (United Kingdom) and 2017–2019 (the Netherlands). Interviews took place nationwide at children’s homes. We performed a secondary analysis of the two datasets, combining an amplified analysis aimed to enlarge our dataset, and a supplementary analysis, which is a more in-depth investigation of emergent themes that were not fully addressed in the original studies. All participants had been involved in decisions about research participation, either as healthy volunteers, or as patients. Recruitment was aimed for a purposive maximum variation sample, and continued until data saturation occurred. We have studied how children perceived the child-doctor relationship in research. Interviews were audiotaped or videotaped, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti software. Results In total, 52 children were recruited aged 9 to 18, 29 in the United Kingdom and 23 in the Netherlands. Children’s decision-making depended strongly on support by research professionals, both in giving consent and during participation. Often, their treating physician was involved in the research process. Familiarity and trust were important and related to the extent to which children thought doctors understood their situation, were medically competent, showed support and care, and gave priority to the individual child’s safety. A trusting relationship led to a feeling of mutuality and enhanced children’s confidence. This resulted in improving their experiences throughout the entire research process. None of the participants reported that they felt compelled to participate in the research. Conclusions The child-doctor relationship in pediatric research should be characterized by familiarity and trust. This does not compromise children’s voluntary decision but enhances children’s confidence and might result in a feeling of mutuality. By addressing the participation of children as an iterative process during which treatment and research go hand in hand, the recruitment and participation of children in research can be improved.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:15:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-710e264db8b54bf9a935b6c01eede81b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:15:08Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-710e264db8b54bf9a935b6c01eede81b2022-12-21T23:38:51ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312020-07-0120111010.1186/s12887-020-02243-1Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative studyMalou L. Luchtenberg0Els L. M. Maeckelberghe1Louise Locock2A. A. Eduard Verhagen3University of GroningenUniversity of GroningenHealth Services Research Unit, University of AberdeenUniversity of GroningenAbstract Background Children have reported that one reason for participating in research is to help their doctor. This is potentially harmful if associated with coercive consent but might be beneficial for recruitment. We aimed to explore children’s perceptions of the child-doctor relationship in research. Methods This is a multicenter qualitative study with semi structured interviews performed between 2010 and 2011 (United Kingdom) and 2017–2019 (the Netherlands). Interviews took place nationwide at children’s homes. We performed a secondary analysis of the two datasets, combining an amplified analysis aimed to enlarge our dataset, and a supplementary analysis, which is a more in-depth investigation of emergent themes that were not fully addressed in the original studies. All participants had been involved in decisions about research participation, either as healthy volunteers, or as patients. Recruitment was aimed for a purposive maximum variation sample, and continued until data saturation occurred. We have studied how children perceived the child-doctor relationship in research. Interviews were audiotaped or videotaped, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti software. Results In total, 52 children were recruited aged 9 to 18, 29 in the United Kingdom and 23 in the Netherlands. Children’s decision-making depended strongly on support by research professionals, both in giving consent and during participation. Often, their treating physician was involved in the research process. Familiarity and trust were important and related to the extent to which children thought doctors understood their situation, were medically competent, showed support and care, and gave priority to the individual child’s safety. A trusting relationship led to a feeling of mutuality and enhanced children’s confidence. This resulted in improving their experiences throughout the entire research process. None of the participants reported that they felt compelled to participate in the research. Conclusions The child-doctor relationship in pediatric research should be characterized by familiarity and trust. This does not compromise children’s voluntary decision but enhances children’s confidence and might result in a feeling of mutuality. By addressing the participation of children as an iterative process during which treatment and research go hand in hand, the recruitment and participation of children in research can be improved.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12887-020-02243-1ChildrenMedical researchTrustFamiliarityDoctor patient relation
spellingShingle Malou L. Luchtenberg
Els L. M. Maeckelberghe
Louise Locock
A. A. Eduard Verhagen
Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study
BMC Pediatrics
Children
Medical research
Trust
Familiarity
Doctor patient relation
title Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study
title_full Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study
title_short Understanding the child-doctor relationship in research participation: a qualitative study
title_sort understanding the child doctor relationship in research participation a qualitative study
topic Children
Medical research
Trust
Familiarity
Doctor patient relation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12887-020-02243-1
work_keys_str_mv AT maloulluchtenberg understandingthechilddoctorrelationshipinresearchparticipationaqualitativestudy
AT elslmmaeckelberghe understandingthechilddoctorrelationshipinresearchparticipationaqualitativestudy
AT louiselocock understandingthechilddoctorrelationshipinresearchparticipationaqualitativestudy
AT aaeduardverhagen understandingthechilddoctorrelationshipinresearchparticipationaqualitativestudy