A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis

Abstract Determining the relative influence of biotic and abiotic processes in structuring communities at local to large spatial scales is best understood using a biogeographic comparative‐experimental approach. Using this approach, previous work suggests that intertidal community dynamics (top‐down...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce A. Menge, Sarah A. Gravem, Erin Richmond, Mae M. Noble
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-05-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4531
_version_ 1797817065854205952
author Bruce A. Menge
Sarah A. Gravem
Erin Richmond
Mae M. Noble
author_facet Bruce A. Menge
Sarah A. Gravem
Erin Richmond
Mae M. Noble
author_sort Bruce A. Menge
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Determining the relative influence of biotic and abiotic processes in structuring communities at local to large spatial scales is best understood using a biogeographic comparative‐experimental approach. Using this approach, previous work suggests that intertidal community dynamics (top‐down and bottom‐up effects) vary unimodally along an upwelling‐based productivity gradient, termed the Intermittent Upwelling Hypothesis (IUH). Evidence consistent with the IUH comes from the sessile invertebrate/predator (SIP) subweb in certain rocky intertidal communities, but whether this pattern extends to macrophyte/herbivore (MH) subwebs is unknown. Here we ask: Are MH subwebs also structured as predicted by the IUH? What is the relative importance of herbivory and predation in structuring these communities? Under what conditions do ecological subsidies like nutrients or propagule production drive community dynamics? And are omnivorous interactions important? We hypothesize that MH subwebs are driven by a new construct, the Grazing‐Weakening Hypothesis (GWH), which states that MH interactions weaken monotonically with increasing nutrients, with strong (weak) herbivory and low (high) macrophyte productivity at low (high) nutrients. We explored local‐to‐large spatial scale dynamics of both subwebs using a biogeographic comparative‐experimental factorial field experiment testing joint and separate effects of herbivores and predators between two continents. Experiments at 10 sites ranging from persistent upwelling to persistent downwelling regimes ran for 26–29 months in Oregon and California, and New Zealand (NZ) South Island. For the MH subweb, results were consistent with the GWH: herbivory declined and macrophytes increased with increasing nutrients. As expected, results for the SIP subweb were consistent with the IUH: predator effect size was unimodally related to upwelling. Overall, herbivory explained more variation in community structure than did predation, especially in NZ. Omnivory was weak, sessile invertebrates outcompeted macrophytes, and ocean‐driven subsidies provided the basic template driving ecosystem dynamics. We propose a unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model combining MH and SIP results: with increased upwelling, sessile invertebrates and underlying dynamics vary unimodally (as in the IUH), while herbivory decreases and macrophytes generally increase. While this model was based on research in temperate ecosystems varying in upwelling regime, its wider applicability remains to be tested.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T08:47:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71182046cefb44cd8b3e446660bccce5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-8925
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T08:47:05Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj.art-71182046cefb44cd8b3e446660bccce52023-05-30T00:04:33ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252023-05-01145n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.4531A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesisBruce A. Menge0Sarah A. Gravem1Erin Richmond2Mae M. Noble3Department of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USADepartment of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USADepartment of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USADepartment of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USAAbstract Determining the relative influence of biotic and abiotic processes in structuring communities at local to large spatial scales is best understood using a biogeographic comparative‐experimental approach. Using this approach, previous work suggests that intertidal community dynamics (top‐down and bottom‐up effects) vary unimodally along an upwelling‐based productivity gradient, termed the Intermittent Upwelling Hypothesis (IUH). Evidence consistent with the IUH comes from the sessile invertebrate/predator (SIP) subweb in certain rocky intertidal communities, but whether this pattern extends to macrophyte/herbivore (MH) subwebs is unknown. Here we ask: Are MH subwebs also structured as predicted by the IUH? What is the relative importance of herbivory and predation in structuring these communities? Under what conditions do ecological subsidies like nutrients or propagule production drive community dynamics? And are omnivorous interactions important? We hypothesize that MH subwebs are driven by a new construct, the Grazing‐Weakening Hypothesis (GWH), which states that MH interactions weaken monotonically with increasing nutrients, with strong (weak) herbivory and low (high) macrophyte productivity at low (high) nutrients. We explored local‐to‐large spatial scale dynamics of both subwebs using a biogeographic comparative‐experimental factorial field experiment testing joint and separate effects of herbivores and predators between two continents. Experiments at 10 sites ranging from persistent upwelling to persistent downwelling regimes ran for 26–29 months in Oregon and California, and New Zealand (NZ) South Island. For the MH subweb, results were consistent with the GWH: herbivory declined and macrophytes increased with increasing nutrients. As expected, results for the SIP subweb were consistent with the IUH: predator effect size was unimodally related to upwelling. Overall, herbivory explained more variation in community structure than did predation, especially in NZ. Omnivory was weak, sessile invertebrates outcompeted macrophytes, and ocean‐driven subsidies provided the basic template driving ecosystem dynamics. We propose a unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model combining MH and SIP results: with increased upwelling, sessile invertebrates and underlying dynamics vary unimodally (as in the IUH), while herbivory decreases and macrophytes generally increase. While this model was based on research in temperate ecosystems varying in upwelling regime, its wider applicability remains to be tested.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4531biogeographic experimentsbottom‐upcomparative‐experimental approachecological subsidiesGrazing‐Weakening Hypothesisherbivore‐macrophyte subweb
spellingShingle Bruce A. Menge
Sarah A. Gravem
Erin Richmond
Mae M. Noble
A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis
Ecosphere
biogeographic experiments
bottom‐up
comparative‐experimental approach
ecological subsidies
Grazing‐Weakening Hypothesis
herbivore‐macrophyte subweb
title A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis
title_full A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis
title_fullStr A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis
title_short A unified meta‐ecosystem dynamics model: Integrating herbivore‐plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis
title_sort unified meta ecosystem dynamics model integrating herbivore plant subwebs with the intermittent upwelling hypothesis
topic biogeographic experiments
bottom‐up
comparative‐experimental approach
ecological subsidies
Grazing‐Weakening Hypothesis
herbivore‐macrophyte subweb
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4531
work_keys_str_mv AT bruceamenge aunifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis
AT sarahagravem aunifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis
AT erinrichmond aunifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis
AT maemnoble aunifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis
AT bruceamenge unifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis
AT sarahagravem unifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis
AT erinrichmond unifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis
AT maemnoble unifiedmetaecosystemdynamicsmodelintegratingherbivoreplantsubwebswiththeintermittentupwellinghypothesis