Exploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted management

Identifying the relative importance of different socio-ecological drivers that affect the ecosystem services (ESs) clusters provides a potential opportunity for spatially targeted policy design. Taking Central Asia (CA) as a case study, the spatiotemporal distribution of seven ESs was evaluated at t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiangyue Li, Chi Zhang, Xi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac12ef
_version_ 1797747595074863104
author Jiangyue Li
Chi Zhang
Xi Chen
author_facet Jiangyue Li
Chi Zhang
Xi Chen
author_sort Jiangyue Li
collection DOAJ
description Identifying the relative importance of different socio-ecological drivers that affect the ecosystem services (ESs) clusters provides a potential opportunity for spatially targeted policy design. Taking Central Asia (CA) as a case study, the spatiotemporal distribution of seven ESs was evaluated at the state level, and then a principal component analysis and k -means clustering were applied to explore the ES clusters. Based on Spearman’s correlation coefficients, the trade-offs and synergies relationship between ESs were analyzed at the different ES clusters scales. A redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to determine the relative contribution of socio-ecological factors affecting the distribution of ES clusters. The ES quantification revealed the spatial consistency and separation among different types of ESs. Similarities and differences of the trade-offs and synergies among ESs existed in five ES clusters (i.e. ‘ESC1: agricultural cluster’, ‘ESC2: carbon cluster’, ‘ESC3: sand fixation cluster’, ‘ESC4: habitat cluster’ and ‘ESC5: Soil and water cluster’). Pairwise water yield, soil retention, carbon storage and net primary production had good synergetic relationships in ESC1, ESC2, ESC4 and ESC5; sand fixation displayed negative correlations with other ESs in all ESCs; and the trade-offs relationships existed between food production and habitat quality in ESC1, ESC2 and ESC5. The RDA demonstrated that the explanatory power of the ecological variables (e.g. climate and vegetation) to the spatial distribution of ES clusters was much higher than that of the socio-economic variables (e.g. population and GDP). An important information/recommendation provided by this study is that ES clusters should be treated as the basic ecological management unit in CA, and different management strategies should be designed in accordance to the major interactions among the ESs in each ES cluster.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:53:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-711aa7c95b8746c4b09fefc08a38c3c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:53:44Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-711aa7c95b8746c4b09fefc08a38c3c42023-08-09T15:02:30ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262021-01-0116808405310.1088/1748-9326/ac12efExploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted managementJiangyue Li0Chi Zhang1Xi Chen2State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Urumqi, People’s Republic of China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Urumqi, People’s Republic of China; Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Urumqi, People’s Republic of China; Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water and Soil Conservation and Environmental Protection, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University , Linyi 276000, People’s Republic of ChinaState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Urumqi, People’s Republic of China; Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Urumqi, People’s Republic of ChinaIdentifying the relative importance of different socio-ecological drivers that affect the ecosystem services (ESs) clusters provides a potential opportunity for spatially targeted policy design. Taking Central Asia (CA) as a case study, the spatiotemporal distribution of seven ESs was evaluated at the state level, and then a principal component analysis and k -means clustering were applied to explore the ES clusters. Based on Spearman’s correlation coefficients, the trade-offs and synergies relationship between ESs were analyzed at the different ES clusters scales. A redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to determine the relative contribution of socio-ecological factors affecting the distribution of ES clusters. The ES quantification revealed the spatial consistency and separation among different types of ESs. Similarities and differences of the trade-offs and synergies among ESs existed in five ES clusters (i.e. ‘ESC1: agricultural cluster’, ‘ESC2: carbon cluster’, ‘ESC3: sand fixation cluster’, ‘ESC4: habitat cluster’ and ‘ESC5: Soil and water cluster’). Pairwise water yield, soil retention, carbon storage and net primary production had good synergetic relationships in ESC1, ESC2, ESC4 and ESC5; sand fixation displayed negative correlations with other ESs in all ESCs; and the trade-offs relationships existed between food production and habitat quality in ESC1, ESC2 and ESC5. The RDA demonstrated that the explanatory power of the ecological variables (e.g. climate and vegetation) to the spatial distribution of ES clusters was much higher than that of the socio-economic variables (e.g. population and GDP). An important information/recommendation provided by this study is that ES clusters should be treated as the basic ecological management unit in CA, and different management strategies should be designed in accordance to the major interactions among the ESs in each ES cluster.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac12efecosystem serviceclusterstrade-offs and synergiesdriving factorsCentral Asia
spellingShingle Jiangyue Li
Chi Zhang
Xi Chen
Exploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted management
Environmental Research Letters
ecosystem service
clusters
trade-offs and synergies
driving factors
Central Asia
title Exploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted management
title_full Exploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted management
title_fullStr Exploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted management
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted management
title_short Exploring the relative importance of socio-ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters: a support to spatially targeted management
title_sort exploring the relative importance of socio ecological factors to ecosystem services clusters a support to spatially targeted management
topic ecosystem service
clusters
trade-offs and synergies
driving factors
Central Asia
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac12ef
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangyueli exploringtherelativeimportanceofsocioecologicalfactorstoecosystemservicesclustersasupporttospatiallytargetedmanagement
AT chizhang exploringtherelativeimportanceofsocioecologicalfactorstoecosystemservicesclustersasupporttospatiallytargetedmanagement
AT xichen exploringtherelativeimportanceofsocioecologicalfactorstoecosystemservicesclustersasupporttospatiallytargetedmanagement