COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study

Gary T Ferguson,1 Mo Ghafouri,2 Luyan Dai,2 Leonard J Dunn31Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Livonia, MI, USA; 2Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA; 3Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc, Clearwater, FL, USABackground: Ipratropium bromide/albuterol Res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferguson GT, Ghafouri M, Dai L, Dunn LJ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2013-03-01
Series:International Journal of COPD
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/copd-patient-satisfaction-with-ipratropium-bromidealbuterol-delivered--a12500
_version_ 1819154396637822976
author Ferguson GT
Ghafouri M
Dai L
Dunn LJ
author_facet Ferguson GT
Ghafouri M
Dai L
Dunn LJ
author_sort Ferguson GT
collection DOAJ
description Gary T Ferguson,1 Mo Ghafouri,2 Luyan Dai,2 Leonard J Dunn31Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Livonia, MI, USA; 2Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA; 3Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc, Clearwater, FL, USABackground: Ipratropium bromide/albuterol Respimat inhaler (CVT-R) was developed as an environmentally friendly alternative to ipratropium bromide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler (CVT-MDI), which uses a chlorofluorocarbon propellant.Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, device usage, and long-term safety of CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI, and to the simultaneous administration of ipratropium bromide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA; I) and albuterol HFA (A) metered-dose inhalers as dual monotherapies (I + A).Design: This is a 48-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study (n = 470) comparing CVT-R to CVT-MDI and to I + A.Participants: Patients were at least 40 years of age, diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and current or exsmokers.Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive: (1) CVT-R, one inhalation four times daily (QID); or (2) CVT-MDI, two inhalations QID; or (3) I + A two inhalations of each inhaler QID.Main measures: Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) performance score (primary endpoint) and adverse events.Key results: PASAPQ performance score was significantly higher (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, 9.6; and CVT-R versus I + A, 6.2; both P < 0.001) when using CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI or I + A at all visits starting from week 3, while CVT-MDI and I + A treatment groups were similar. Time to first COPD exacerbation was slightly longer in the CVT-R group compared to the other treatment groups, although it did not reach statistical significance (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.57; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.22). Rates of withdrawal and patient refusal to continue treatment were lower in CVT-R compared with CVT-MDI and I + A groups (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.09; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.005). The percentage of patients reporting adverse events and serious adverse events was similar across all three treatment groups.Conclusion: CVT-R is an effective, environmentally friendly inhaler that provides patients with a high level of user satisfaction and may positively impact clinical outcomes while having no adverse impacts on patients using the device.Keywords: COPD, consumer satisfaction, consumer preference, inhalers
first_indexed 2024-12-22T15:20:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-711fbcda3c2348f0bdb2409c1f853dd6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1176-9106
1178-2005
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T15:20:25Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series International Journal of COPD
spelling doaj.art-711fbcda3c2348f0bdb2409c1f853dd62022-12-21T18:21:38ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of COPD1176-91061178-20052013-03-012013default139150COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled studyFerguson GTGhafouri MDai LDunn LJGary T Ferguson,1 Mo Ghafouri,2 Luyan Dai,2 Leonard J Dunn31Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Livonia, MI, USA; 2Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA; 3Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc, Clearwater, FL, USABackground: Ipratropium bromide/albuterol Respimat inhaler (CVT-R) was developed as an environmentally friendly alternative to ipratropium bromide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler (CVT-MDI), which uses a chlorofluorocarbon propellant.Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, device usage, and long-term safety of CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI, and to the simultaneous administration of ipratropium bromide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA; I) and albuterol HFA (A) metered-dose inhalers as dual monotherapies (I + A).Design: This is a 48-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study (n = 470) comparing CVT-R to CVT-MDI and to I + A.Participants: Patients were at least 40 years of age, diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and current or exsmokers.Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive: (1) CVT-R, one inhalation four times daily (QID); or (2) CVT-MDI, two inhalations QID; or (3) I + A two inhalations of each inhaler QID.Main measures: Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) performance score (primary endpoint) and adverse events.Key results: PASAPQ performance score was significantly higher (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, 9.6; and CVT-R versus I + A, 6.2; both P < 0.001) when using CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI or I + A at all visits starting from week 3, while CVT-MDI and I + A treatment groups were similar. Time to first COPD exacerbation was slightly longer in the CVT-R group compared to the other treatment groups, although it did not reach statistical significance (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.57; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.22). Rates of withdrawal and patient refusal to continue treatment were lower in CVT-R compared with CVT-MDI and I + A groups (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.09; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.005). The percentage of patients reporting adverse events and serious adverse events was similar across all three treatment groups.Conclusion: CVT-R is an effective, environmentally friendly inhaler that provides patients with a high level of user satisfaction and may positively impact clinical outcomes while having no adverse impacts on patients using the device.Keywords: COPD, consumer satisfaction, consumer preference, inhalershttp://www.dovepress.com/copd-patient-satisfaction-with-ipratropium-bromidealbuterol-delivered--a12500
spellingShingle Ferguson GT
Ghafouri M
Dai L
Dunn LJ
COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
International Journal of COPD
title COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_full COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_fullStr COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_full_unstemmed COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_short COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_sort copd patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide albuterol delivered via respimat a randomized controlled study
url http://www.dovepress.com/copd-patient-satisfaction-with-ipratropium-bromidealbuterol-delivered--a12500
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusongt copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ghafourim copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dail copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dunnlj copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy