Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest

Abstract Background The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about confl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garrhett G. Via, David A. Brueggeman, Joseph G. Lyons, Isabelle C. Ely, Andrew W. Froehle, Anil B. Krishnamurthy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:Arthroplasty
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3
_version_ 1797984674167914496
author Garrhett G. Via
David A. Brueggeman
Joseph G. Lyons
Isabelle C. Ely
Andrew W. Froehle
Anil B. Krishnamurthy
author_facet Garrhett G. Via
David A. Brueggeman
Joseph G. Lyons
Isabelle C. Ely
Andrew W. Froehle
Anil B. Krishnamurthy
author_sort Garrhett G. Via
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of interest (COI). Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for total hip and knee arthroplasties, unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA), PSI, CA, and RA. Bibliometric data, financial COI, clinical/functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Results Eighty-seven studies were evaluated, with 35 (40.2%) including at least one author reporting COI, and 13 (14.9%) disclosing industry funding. COI and industry funding had no significant effects on outcomes (P = 0.682, P = 0.447), and there were no significant effects of conflicts or funding on level of evidence (P = 0.508, P = 0.826). Studies in which author(s) disclosed COI had significantly higher relative citation ratio (RCR) and impact factor (IF) than those without (P < 0.001, P = 0.032). Subanalysis demonstrated RA and PSI studies were more likely to report COI or industry funding (P = 0.045). RA (OR = 6.31, 95% CI: 1.61–24.68) and UKA (OR = 9.14, 95% CI: 1.43–58.53) had higher odds of reporting favorable outcomes than PSI. Conclusions Author COIs (about 40%) may be lower than previously reported in orthopedic technologies/techniques reviews. Studies utilizing RA and PSI were more likely to report COI, while RA and UKA studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than PSI. No statistically significant association between the presence of COIs and/or industry funding and the frequency of favorable outcomes or study level of evidence was found. Level of evidence Level V Systematic Review
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:05:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71259bcc7d4e44a4804a48b24b939273
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2524-7948
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:05:45Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty
spelling doaj.art-71259bcc7d4e44a4804a48b24b9392732022-12-22T04:38:23ZengBMCArthroplasty2524-79482022-11-014111110.1186/s42836-022-00146-3Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interestGarrhett G. Via0David A. Brueggeman1Joseph G. Lyons2Isabelle C. Ely3Andrew W. Froehle4Anil B. Krishnamurthy5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State UniversityAbstract Background The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of interest (COI). Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for total hip and knee arthroplasties, unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA), PSI, CA, and RA. Bibliometric data, financial COI, clinical/functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Results Eighty-seven studies were evaluated, with 35 (40.2%) including at least one author reporting COI, and 13 (14.9%) disclosing industry funding. COI and industry funding had no significant effects on outcomes (P = 0.682, P = 0.447), and there were no significant effects of conflicts or funding on level of evidence (P = 0.508, P = 0.826). Studies in which author(s) disclosed COI had significantly higher relative citation ratio (RCR) and impact factor (IF) than those without (P < 0.001, P = 0.032). Subanalysis demonstrated RA and PSI studies were more likely to report COI or industry funding (P = 0.045). RA (OR = 6.31, 95% CI: 1.61–24.68) and UKA (OR = 9.14, 95% CI: 1.43–58.53) had higher odds of reporting favorable outcomes than PSI. Conclusions Author COIs (about 40%) may be lower than previously reported in orthopedic technologies/techniques reviews. Studies utilizing RA and PSI were more likely to report COI, while RA and UKA studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than PSI. No statistically significant association between the presence of COIs and/or industry funding and the frequency of favorable outcomes or study level of evidence was found. Level of evidence Level V Systematic Reviewhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3Conflict of interestFundingTotal joint arthroplastyRobotic-assistedComputer-navigatedPatient-specific implant
spellingShingle Garrhett G. Via
David A. Brueggeman
Joseph G. Lyons
Isabelle C. Ely
Andrew W. Froehle
Anil B. Krishnamurthy
Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
Arthroplasty
Conflict of interest
Funding
Total joint arthroplasty
Robotic-assisted
Computer-navigated
Patient-specific implant
title Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_full Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_fullStr Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_full_unstemmed Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_short Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_sort funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
topic Conflict of interest
Funding
Total joint arthroplasty
Robotic-assisted
Computer-navigated
Patient-specific implant
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3
work_keys_str_mv AT garrhettgvia fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT davidabrueggeman fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT josephglyons fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT isabellecely fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT andrewwfroehle fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT anilbkrishnamurthy fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest