Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Recent events in Europe, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 Russo–Ukrainian War (RUW), might have sparked anxiety among adolescents. This study aimed to compare anxiety levels in Lithuanian adolescents post-COVID-19 peak (Study 1, October 2021) and during the onset of the RUW (Study 2, April–Ju...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Šalčiūnaitė-Nikonovė, Monika Žemaitaitytė, Kastytis Šmigelskas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Children
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/1/32
_version_ 1797344423956185088
author Laura Šalčiūnaitė-Nikonovė
Monika Žemaitaitytė
Kastytis Šmigelskas
author_facet Laura Šalčiūnaitė-Nikonovė
Monika Žemaitaitytė
Kastytis Šmigelskas
author_sort Laura Šalčiūnaitė-Nikonovė
collection DOAJ
description Recent events in Europe, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 Russo–Ukrainian War (RUW), might have sparked anxiety among adolescents. This study aimed to compare anxiety levels in Lithuanian adolescents post-COVID-19 peak (Study 1, October 2021) and during the onset of the RUW (Study 2, April–June 2022). Data from 459 participants in Study 1 and 6637 in Study 2, aged 11–17, were collected through HBSC pilot and national surveys in Lithuania. Self-reported questionnaires assessed anxiety, social media use, stress, loneliness, self-efficacy, and peer support factors. Analysis was conducted using multivariable logistic regressions. Notably, anxiety prevalence in Lithuanian adolescents showed no significant difference between Study 1 and Study 2, stabilizing around 24%. In 2021, stress (OR = 5.89, 95% CI 3.11–11.17), problematic social media use (OR = 4.58, 95% CI 1.89–10.58), and female gender (OR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.58–5.22) significantly predicted anxiety. By 2022, stress (OR = 3.68, 95% CI 3.14–4.30), loneliness (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 2.43–3.35), and lower self-efficacy (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.60) emerged as important predictors. This study enhances our understanding of adolescent anxiety during crises, emphasizing the urgency of addressing multiple factors to manage and support vulnerable youth.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:02:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-712c27f6f41e4d52bbcffd698fc24b68
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:02:12Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Children
spelling doaj.art-712c27f6f41e4d52bbcffd698fc24b682024-01-26T15:46:45ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672023-12-011113210.3390/children11010032Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional StudyLaura Šalčiūnaitė-Nikonovė0Monika Žemaitaitytė1Kastytis Šmigelskas2Health Research Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-47181 Kaunas, LithuaniaHealth Research Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-47181 Kaunas, LithuaniaHealth Research Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-47181 Kaunas, LithuaniaRecent events in Europe, like the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 Russo–Ukrainian War (RUW), might have sparked anxiety among adolescents. This study aimed to compare anxiety levels in Lithuanian adolescents post-COVID-19 peak (Study 1, October 2021) and during the onset of the RUW (Study 2, April–June 2022). Data from 459 participants in Study 1 and 6637 in Study 2, aged 11–17, were collected through HBSC pilot and national surveys in Lithuania. Self-reported questionnaires assessed anxiety, social media use, stress, loneliness, self-efficacy, and peer support factors. Analysis was conducted using multivariable logistic regressions. Notably, anxiety prevalence in Lithuanian adolescents showed no significant difference between Study 1 and Study 2, stabilizing around 24%. In 2021, stress (OR = 5.89, 95% CI 3.11–11.17), problematic social media use (OR = 4.58, 95% CI 1.89–10.58), and female gender (OR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.58–5.22) significantly predicted anxiety. By 2022, stress (OR = 3.68, 95% CI 3.14–4.30), loneliness (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 2.43–3.35), and lower self-efficacy (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.60) emerged as important predictors. This study enhances our understanding of adolescent anxiety during crises, emphasizing the urgency of addressing multiple factors to manage and support vulnerable youth.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/1/32anxietyadolescentCOVID-19RUWwarHBSC
spellingShingle Laura Šalčiūnaitė-Nikonovė
Monika Žemaitaitytė
Kastytis Šmigelskas
Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Study
Children
anxiety
adolescent
COVID-19
RUW
war
HBSC
title Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Exploring the Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety among Lithuanian Adolescents during Times of Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort exploring the prevalence and predictors of anxiety among lithuanian adolescents during times of crisis a cross sectional study
topic anxiety
adolescent
COVID-19
RUW
war
HBSC
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/1/32
work_keys_str_mv AT laurasalciunaitenikonove exploringtheprevalenceandpredictorsofanxietyamonglithuanianadolescentsduringtimesofcrisisacrosssectionalstudy
AT monikazemaitaityte exploringtheprevalenceandpredictorsofanxietyamonglithuanianadolescentsduringtimesofcrisisacrosssectionalstudy
AT kastytissmigelskas exploringtheprevalenceandpredictorsofanxietyamonglithuanianadolescentsduringtimesofcrisisacrosssectionalstudy