Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network
<p>Detection of liquid-containing cloud layers in thick mixed-phase clouds or multi-layer cloud situations from ground-based remote-sensing instruments still poses observational challenges, yet improvements are crucial since the existence of multi-layer liquid layers in mixed-phase cloud situa...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| Online Access: | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/279/2022/amt-15-279-2022.pdf |
| _version_ | 1828126392997380096 |
|---|---|
| author | H. Kalesse-Los H. Kalesse-Los W. Schimmel E. Luke P. Seifert |
| author_facet | H. Kalesse-Los H. Kalesse-Los W. Schimmel E. Luke P. Seifert |
| author_sort | H. Kalesse-Los |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Detection of liquid-containing cloud layers in thick mixed-phase clouds or multi-layer cloud situations from ground-based remote-sensing instruments still poses observational challenges, yet improvements are crucial since the existence of multi-layer liquid layers in mixed-phase cloud situations influences cloud radiative effects, cloud lifetime, and precipitation formation processes. Hydrometeor target classifications such as from Cloudnet that require a lidar signal for the classification of liquid are limited to the maximum height of lidar signal penetration and thus often lead to underestimations of liquid-containing cloud layers. Here we evaluate the Cloudnet liquid detection against the approach of <span class="cit" id="xref_text.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx24">Luke et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx24">2010</a>)</span> which extracts morphological features in cloud-penetrating cloud radar Doppler spectra measurements in an artificial neural network (ANN) approach to classify liquid beyond full lidar signal attenuation based on the simulation of the two lidar parameters particle backscatter coefficient and particle depolarization ratio. We show that the ANN of <span class="cit" id="xref_text.2"><a href="#bib1.bibx24">Luke et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx24">2010</a>)</span> which was trained under Arctic conditions can successfully be applied to observations at the mid-latitudes obtained during the 7-week-long ACCEPT field experiment in Cabauw, the Netherlands, in 2014. In a sensitivity study covering the whole duration of the ACCEPT campaign, different liquid-detection thresholds for ANN-predicted lidar variables are applied and evaluated against the Cloudnet target classification. Independent validation of the liquid mask from the standard Cloudnet target classification against the ANN-based technique is realized by comparisons to observations of microwave radiometer liquid-water path, ceilometer liquid-layer base altitude, and radiosonde relative humidity. In addition, a case-study comparison against the cloud feature mask detected by the space-borne lidar aboard the CALIPSO satellite is presented. Three conclusions were drawn from the investigation. First, it was found that the threshold selection criteria of liquid-related lidar backscatter and depolarization alone control the liquid detection considerably. Second, all threshold values used in the ANN framework were found to outperform the Cloudnet target classification for deep or multi-layer cloud situations where the lidar signal is fully attenuated within low liquid layers and the cloud radar is able to detect the microphysical fingerprint of liquid in higher cloud layers. Third, if lidar data are available, Cloudnet is at least as good as the ANN. The times when Cloudnet outperforms the ANN in liquid detections are often associated with situations where cloud dynamics smear the imprint of cloud microphysics on the radar Doppler spectra.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:34:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-713dcfd7075444098b6bd1a8989b8d5d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1867-1381 1867-8548 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:34:39Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| spelling | doaj.art-713dcfd7075444098b6bd1a8989b8d5d2022-12-22T04:16:03ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482022-01-011527929510.5194/amt-15-279-2022Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural networkH. Kalesse-Los0H. Kalesse-Los1W. Schimmel2E. Luke3P. Seifert4Institute for Meteorology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyLeibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, GermanyInstitute for Meteorology, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyEnvironmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USALeibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany<p>Detection of liquid-containing cloud layers in thick mixed-phase clouds or multi-layer cloud situations from ground-based remote-sensing instruments still poses observational challenges, yet improvements are crucial since the existence of multi-layer liquid layers in mixed-phase cloud situations influences cloud radiative effects, cloud lifetime, and precipitation formation processes. Hydrometeor target classifications such as from Cloudnet that require a lidar signal for the classification of liquid are limited to the maximum height of lidar signal penetration and thus often lead to underestimations of liquid-containing cloud layers. Here we evaluate the Cloudnet liquid detection against the approach of <span class="cit" id="xref_text.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx24">Luke et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx24">2010</a>)</span> which extracts morphological features in cloud-penetrating cloud radar Doppler spectra measurements in an artificial neural network (ANN) approach to classify liquid beyond full lidar signal attenuation based on the simulation of the two lidar parameters particle backscatter coefficient and particle depolarization ratio. We show that the ANN of <span class="cit" id="xref_text.2"><a href="#bib1.bibx24">Luke et al.</a> (<a href="#bib1.bibx24">2010</a>)</span> which was trained under Arctic conditions can successfully be applied to observations at the mid-latitudes obtained during the 7-week-long ACCEPT field experiment in Cabauw, the Netherlands, in 2014. In a sensitivity study covering the whole duration of the ACCEPT campaign, different liquid-detection thresholds for ANN-predicted lidar variables are applied and evaluated against the Cloudnet target classification. Independent validation of the liquid mask from the standard Cloudnet target classification against the ANN-based technique is realized by comparisons to observations of microwave radiometer liquid-water path, ceilometer liquid-layer base altitude, and radiosonde relative humidity. In addition, a case-study comparison against the cloud feature mask detected by the space-borne lidar aboard the CALIPSO satellite is presented. Three conclusions were drawn from the investigation. First, it was found that the threshold selection criteria of liquid-related lidar backscatter and depolarization alone control the liquid detection considerably. Second, all threshold values used in the ANN framework were found to outperform the Cloudnet target classification for deep or multi-layer cloud situations where the lidar signal is fully attenuated within low liquid layers and the cloud radar is able to detect the microphysical fingerprint of liquid in higher cloud layers. Third, if lidar data are available, Cloudnet is at least as good as the ANN. The times when Cloudnet outperforms the ANN in liquid detections are often associated with situations where cloud dynamics smear the imprint of cloud microphysics on the radar Doppler spectra.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/279/2022/amt-15-279-2022.pdf |
| spellingShingle | H. Kalesse-Los H. Kalesse-Los W. Schimmel E. Luke P. Seifert Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| title | Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network |
| title_full | Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network |
| title_short | Evaluating cloud liquid detection against Cloudnet using cloud radar Doppler spectra in a pre-trained artificial neural network |
| title_sort | evaluating cloud liquid detection against cloudnet using cloud radar doppler spectra in a pre trained artificial neural network |
| url | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/279/2022/amt-15-279-2022.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hkalesselos evaluatingcloudliquiddetectionagainstcloudnetusingcloudradardopplerspectrainapretrainedartificialneuralnetwork AT hkalesselos evaluatingcloudliquiddetectionagainstcloudnetusingcloudradardopplerspectrainapretrainedartificialneuralnetwork AT wschimmel evaluatingcloudliquiddetectionagainstcloudnetusingcloudradardopplerspectrainapretrainedartificialneuralnetwork AT eluke evaluatingcloudliquiddetectionagainstcloudnetusingcloudradardopplerspectrainapretrainedartificialneuralnetwork AT pseifert evaluatingcloudliquiddetectionagainstcloudnetusingcloudradardopplerspectrainapretrainedartificialneuralnetwork |