The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure.
Review, promotion, and tenure (RPT) processes at universities typically assess candidates along three dimensions: research, teaching, and service. In recent years, some have argued for the inclusion of a controversial fourth criterion: collegiality. While collegiality plays a role in the morale and...
Main Authors: | Diane DeDe Dawson, Esteban Morales, Erin C McKiernan, Lesley A Schimanski, Meredith T Niles, Juan Pablo Alperin |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265506 |
Similar Items
-
Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations.
by: Meredith T Niles, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
by: Erin C McKiernan, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals
by: Esteban Morales, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?
by: Juan P Alperin, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Lesley A. Schimanski, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)