Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking

This paper focuses on the relationship between pe marking and clitic doubling in Romanian arguing in favour of Bleam’s (1999) hypothesis: the two mechanisms are semantically related through the specificity effects they both engender, but are otherwise independent one from the other. Diachronic data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alina-Mihaela Tigău
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti 2014-05-01
Series:Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/BWPL_2014_nr.1_TIGAU.pdf
_version_ 1828438809579094016
author Alina-Mihaela Tigău
author_facet Alina-Mihaela Tigău
author_sort Alina-Mihaela Tigău
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on the relationship between pe marking and clitic doubling in Romanian arguing in favour of Bleam’s (1999) hypothesis: the two mechanisms are semantically related through the specificity effects they both engender, but are otherwise independent one from the other. Diachronic data support this hypothesis. Another point which supports this hypothesis is that pe marking may be used in some contexts in which clitic doubling is not allowed (bare quantifiers). Furthermore, pe marking is not as consistent as clitic doubling when putting forth specificity effects. As to the way in which specificity effects arise we have identified different mechanisms: in the case of clitic doubling, the clitic pronoun acts as a restrictor on the domain variable of the DP it doubles, while in the case of pe marking, the specific interpretation is taken to be the effect of a certain interpretation procedure triggered by the insertion of pe (a semantic type shifter).
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:13:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7153ce271cd24fb08422110e983bead9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2069-9239
2069-9239
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:13:58Z
publishDate 2014-05-01
publisher Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti
record_format Article
series Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-7153ce271cd24fb08422110e983bead92022-12-22T01:35:15ZengEditura Universitatii din BucurestiBucharest Working Papers in Linguistics2069-92392069-92392014-05-01XVI14362Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe markingAlina-Mihaela TigăuThis paper focuses on the relationship between pe marking and clitic doubling in Romanian arguing in favour of Bleam’s (1999) hypothesis: the two mechanisms are semantically related through the specificity effects they both engender, but are otherwise independent one from the other. Diachronic data support this hypothesis. Another point which supports this hypothesis is that pe marking may be used in some contexts in which clitic doubling is not allowed (bare quantifiers). Furthermore, pe marking is not as consistent as clitic doubling when putting forth specificity effects. As to the way in which specificity effects arise we have identified different mechanisms: in the case of clitic doubling, the clitic pronoun acts as a restrictor on the domain variable of the DP it doubles, while in the case of pe marking, the specific interpretation is taken to be the effect of a certain interpretation procedure triggered by the insertion of pe (a semantic type shifter).http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/BWPL_2014_nr.1_TIGAU.pdfspecificityclitic doublingdifferential object marking
spellingShingle Alina-Mihaela Tigău
Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking
Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics
specificity
clitic doubling
differential object marking
title Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking
title_full Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking
title_fullStr Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking
title_full_unstemmed Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking
title_short Specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking
title_sort specificity effects with clitic doubling and pe marking
topic specificity
clitic doubling
differential object marking
url http://bwpl.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/BWPL_2014_nr.1_TIGAU.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alinamihaelatigau specificityeffectswithcliticdoublingandpemarking