Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogma

Objective: Traditional neurosurgical practice calls for administration of peri-operative stress-dose steroids for sellar-suprasellar masses undergoing operative treatment. This practice is considered critical to prevent peri-operative complications associated with hypoadrenalism, such as hypotensio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacqueline Marie Regan, Joseph eWatson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2013.00030/full
_version_ 1818531363552231424
author Jacqueline Marie Regan
Joseph eWatson
author_facet Jacqueline Marie Regan
Joseph eWatson
author_sort Jacqueline Marie Regan
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Traditional neurosurgical practice calls for administration of peri-operative stress-dose steroids for sellar-suprasellar masses undergoing operative treatment. This practice is considered critical to prevent peri-operative complications associated with hypoadrenalism, such as hypotension and circulatory collapse. However, stress-dose steroids complicate the management of these patients. It has been our routine practice to use stress steroids during surgery only if the patient has clinical or biochemical evidence of hypocortisolism pre-operatively. We wanted to be certain that this practice was safe.Methods: We present our retrospective analysis from a consecutive series of 114 operations in 109 patients with sellar and/or suprasellar tumors, the majority of whom were managed without empirical stress-dose steroid coverage. Only patients who were hypoadrenal pre-operatively or who had suffered apoplexy were given stress dose coverage during surgery. We screened for biochemical evidence of hypoadrenalism as a result of surgery by measuring immediate post-operative AM serum cortisol levels.Results: There were no adverse events related to the selective use of cortisol replacement in this patient population. Conclusions: Our experience demonstrates that selective use of corticosteroid replacement is safe; it simplifies the management of the patients, and has advantages over empiric dogmatic steroid coverage.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T17:31:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-715b498996a342e5b408e289a71bb8dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T17:31:30Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-715b498996a342e5b408e289a71bb8dd2022-12-22T00:56:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922013-03-01410.3389/fendo.2013.0003033605Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogmaJacqueline Marie Regan0Joseph eWatson1Inova Fairfax HospitalInova Fairfax HospitalObjective: Traditional neurosurgical practice calls for administration of peri-operative stress-dose steroids for sellar-suprasellar masses undergoing operative treatment. This practice is considered critical to prevent peri-operative complications associated with hypoadrenalism, such as hypotension and circulatory collapse. However, stress-dose steroids complicate the management of these patients. It has been our routine practice to use stress steroids during surgery only if the patient has clinical or biochemical evidence of hypocortisolism pre-operatively. We wanted to be certain that this practice was safe.Methods: We present our retrospective analysis from a consecutive series of 114 operations in 109 patients with sellar and/or suprasellar tumors, the majority of whom were managed without empirical stress-dose steroid coverage. Only patients who were hypoadrenal pre-operatively or who had suffered apoplexy were given stress dose coverage during surgery. We screened for biochemical evidence of hypoadrenalism as a result of surgery by measuring immediate post-operative AM serum cortisol levels.Results: There were no adverse events related to the selective use of cortisol replacement in this patient population. Conclusions: Our experience demonstrates that selective use of corticosteroid replacement is safe; it simplifies the management of the patients, and has advantages over empiric dogmatic steroid coverage.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2013.00030/fullCraniopharyngiomacortisolpituitary adenomaRathke's cyststress-dose steroidspanhypopituitary
spellingShingle Jacqueline Marie Regan
Joseph eWatson
Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogma
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Craniopharyngioma
cortisol
pituitary adenoma
Rathke's cyst
stress-dose steroids
panhypopituitary
title Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogma
title_full Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogma
title_fullStr Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogma
title_full_unstemmed Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogma
title_short Selective use of peri-operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery: escape from dogma
title_sort selective use of peri operative steroids in pituitary tumor surgery escape from dogma
topic Craniopharyngioma
cortisol
pituitary adenoma
Rathke's cyst
stress-dose steroids
panhypopituitary
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2013.00030/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquelinemarieregan selectiveuseofperioperativesteroidsinpituitarytumorsurgeryescapefromdogma
AT josephewatson selectiveuseofperioperativesteroidsinpituitarytumorsurgeryescapefromdogma