A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Background We conducted this clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the correction of nasolabial folds. Methods In this phase III, randomized, multi-center, double-masked, matched-pairs, active-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Changsik Pak, Jihoon Park, Jinmyung Hong, Jaehoon Jeong, Saik Bang, Chan Yeong Heo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2015-11-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.721
_version_ 1817995738165018624
author Changsik Pak
Jihoon Park
Jinmyung Hong
Jaehoon Jeong
Saik Bang
Chan Yeong Heo
author_facet Changsik Pak
Jihoon Park
Jinmyung Hong
Jaehoon Jeong
Saik Bang
Chan Yeong Heo
author_sort Changsik Pak
collection DOAJ
description Background We conducted this clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the correction of nasolabial folds. Methods In this phase III, randomized, multi-center, double-masked, matched-pairs, active-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01585220), we evaluated a total of 67 subjects (n=67). All the subjects underwent Neuramis Deep treatment on one side and Restylane on the contralateral side of the bilateral nasolabial folds at a ratio of 1:1. To compare the efficacy of Neuramis Deep and Restylane, we evaluated the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale scores and those of the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. In addition, we compared the safety of Neuramis Deep and Restylane based on adverse events, physical examination, and clinical laboratory tests. Results Neuramis Deep was not inferior in improving the nasolabial folds as compared with Restylane. In addition, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between Neuramis Deep and Restylane. There were no significant differences in safety parameters between Neuramis Deep and Restylane. Conclusions In conclusion, our results indicate that Neuramis Deep may be a safe, effective material for improving the nasolabial folds. However, further studies are warranted to compare the tolerability of Neuramis Deep and Restylane based on histopathologic findings.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T02:11:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-715c0c18c37649c0ac148d95a2d6d305
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T02:11:34Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-715c0c18c37649c0ac148d95a2d6d3052022-12-22T02:18:25ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Archives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712015-11-01420672172810.5999/aps.2015.42.6.721598A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial FoldsChangsik Pak0Jihoon Park1Jinmyung Hong2Jaehoon Jeong3Saik Bang4Chan Yeong Heo5Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, KoreaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, KoreaBackground We conducted this clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the correction of nasolabial folds. Methods In this phase III, randomized, multi-center, double-masked, matched-pairs, active-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01585220), we evaluated a total of 67 subjects (n=67). All the subjects underwent Neuramis Deep treatment on one side and Restylane on the contralateral side of the bilateral nasolabial folds at a ratio of 1:1. To compare the efficacy of Neuramis Deep and Restylane, we evaluated the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale scores and those of the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. In addition, we compared the safety of Neuramis Deep and Restylane based on adverse events, physical examination, and clinical laboratory tests. Results Neuramis Deep was not inferior in improving the nasolabial folds as compared with Restylane. In addition, there was no significant difference in the efficacy between Neuramis Deep and Restylane. There were no significant differences in safety parameters between Neuramis Deep and Restylane. Conclusions In conclusion, our results indicate that Neuramis Deep may be a safe, effective material for improving the nasolabial folds. However, further studies are warranted to compare the tolerability of Neuramis Deep and Restylane based on histopathologic findings.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.721hyaluronic acidnasolabial fold
spellingShingle Changsik Pak
Jihoon Park
Jinmyung Hong
Jaehoon Jeong
Saik Bang
Chan Yeong Heo
A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Archives of Plastic Surgery
hyaluronic acid
nasolabial fold
title A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
title_full A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
title_fullStr A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
title_full_unstemmed A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
title_short A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Matched-Pairs, Active-Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety between Neuramis Deep and Restylane in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
title_sort phase iii randomized multi center double masked matched pairs active controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety between neuramis deep and restylane in the correction of nasolabial folds
topic hyaluronic acid
nasolabial fold
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.721
work_keys_str_mv AT changsikpak aphaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT jihoonpark aphaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT jinmyunghong aphaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT jaehoonjeong aphaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT saikbang aphaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT chanyeongheo aphaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT changsikpak phaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT jihoonpark phaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT jinmyunghong phaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT jaehoonjeong phaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT saikbang phaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds
AT chanyeongheo phaseiiirandomizedmulticenterdoublemaskedmatchedpairsactivecontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyandsafetybetweenneuramisdeepandrestylaneinthecorrectionofnasolabialfolds