The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Method

Background and objective Software oriented three-dimensional (3D) volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules has been feasible in the follow-up of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, however, its value need a further validation. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the chest CT data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: XiaoWan GUO, Ying WANG, Dong LI, Chong ZHANG, Yang CAO, Datong SU, Tielian YU
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis Association 2014-04-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2014.04.08
_version_ 1811302865815207936
author XiaoWan GUO
Ying WANG
Dong LI
Chong ZHANG
Yang CAO
Datong SU
Tielian YU
author_facet XiaoWan GUO
Ying WANG
Dong LI
Chong ZHANG
Yang CAO
Datong SU
Tielian YU
author_sort XiaoWan GUO
collection DOAJ
description Background and objective Software oriented three-dimensional (3D) volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules has been feasible in the follow-up of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, however, its value need a further validation. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the chest CT data of patients with pulmonary nodules to compare the intra-observer variability of 3D and two-dimensional (2D) volumetric measurement. Methods Eighty-six pulmonary nodules in chest CT scans of 79 subjects were retrospectively analyzed. One radiologist measured the nodules twice with a 7 days interval using 2D and 3D methods respectively. The maximal diameter (X), the perpendicular diameter (Y) on maximal cross sectional area of the nodule and the caudo-cranial diameter (Z) were measured and the volume was calculated by two models: spherical and elliptical model. The 3D measurements were acquired with semi-automated software with manual adjustment on unsatisfied nodule segmentation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of nodule location and morphology on 3D nodule segmentation. ANOVA and correlation test were used to evaluate the difference among three methods. Bland-Altman method was applied to quantify the intra-observer variability. Results Software achieved satisfied segmentation for 86.4% nodules. The irregular and juxtavacular nodules have significantly high odds rations (OR) of unsatisfied segmentation as 4.0, 4.5, respectively. The volume measured by three method was significantly different (F=6.5, P=0.012), while the repeated measurements did not led to significant difference (F=1.813, P=0.182). The Spearman correlation efficient between 3D volume and 2D volume with sphere and ellipsoid model was 0.97, 0.88. The 95% limits of agreement of RD between two repeated measurements were -14%-11.6%, -37.7%-39.9% and -39.8%-45.8% for 3D, 2D with elliptical model and spherical model, respectively. Conclusion The 3D volume measurement of pulmonary nodules is more repeatable than 2D volume measurement. Unsatisfied segmentation can occurred on a small number of nodules, especially for irregular and juxtavascular nodules. For these nodules, the measurement of 3D diameters is recommended.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:37:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7169e4b8e1414f209c1b7e342b497ed3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1009-3419
language zho
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:37:02Z
publishDate 2014-04-01
publisher Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis Association
record_format Article
series Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
spelling doaj.art-7169e4b8e1414f209c1b7e342b497ed32022-12-22T02:56:07ZzhoChinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis AssociationChinese Journal of Lung Cancer1009-34192014-04-0117433634110.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2014.04.08The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional MethodXiaoWan GUO0Ying WANG1Dong LI2Chong ZHANG3Yang CAO4Datong SU5Tielian YU6Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, ChinaBackground and objective Software oriented three-dimensional (3D) volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules has been feasible in the follow-up of indeterminate pulmonary nodules, however, its value need a further validation. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the chest CT data of patients with pulmonary nodules to compare the intra-observer variability of 3D and two-dimensional (2D) volumetric measurement. Methods Eighty-six pulmonary nodules in chest CT scans of 79 subjects were retrospectively analyzed. One radiologist measured the nodules twice with a 7 days interval using 2D and 3D methods respectively. The maximal diameter (X), the perpendicular diameter (Y) on maximal cross sectional area of the nodule and the caudo-cranial diameter (Z) were measured and the volume was calculated by two models: spherical and elliptical model. The 3D measurements were acquired with semi-automated software with manual adjustment on unsatisfied nodule segmentation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of nodule location and morphology on 3D nodule segmentation. ANOVA and correlation test were used to evaluate the difference among three methods. Bland-Altman method was applied to quantify the intra-observer variability. Results Software achieved satisfied segmentation for 86.4% nodules. The irregular and juxtavacular nodules have significantly high odds rations (OR) of unsatisfied segmentation as 4.0, 4.5, respectively. The volume measured by three method was significantly different (F=6.5, P=0.012), while the repeated measurements did not led to significant difference (F=1.813, P=0.182). The Spearman correlation efficient between 3D volume and 2D volume with sphere and ellipsoid model was 0.97, 0.88. The 95% limits of agreement of RD between two repeated measurements were -14%-11.6%, -37.7%-39.9% and -39.8%-45.8% for 3D, 2D with elliptical model and spherical model, respectively. Conclusion The 3D volume measurement of pulmonary nodules is more repeatable than 2D volume measurement. Unsatisfied segmentation can occurred on a small number of nodules, especially for irregular and juxtavascular nodules. For these nodules, the measurement of 3D diameters is recommended.http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2014.04.08Pulmonary noduleComputed tomographyVolumetric measurementRepeatability
spellingShingle XiaoWan GUO
Ying WANG
Dong LI
Chong ZHANG
Yang CAO
Datong SU
Tielian YU
The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Method
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
Pulmonary nodule
Computed tomography
Volumetric measurement
Repeatability
title The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Method
title_full The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Method
title_fullStr The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Method
title_full_unstemmed The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Method
title_short The Intra-observer Variability of Volumetric Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules: 
Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Method
title_sort intra observer variability of volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules 
comparison of two dimensional and three dimensional method
topic Pulmonary nodule
Computed tomography
Volumetric measurement
Repeatability
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2014.04.08
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaowanguo theintraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT yingwang theintraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT dongli theintraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT chongzhang theintraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT yangcao theintraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT datongsu theintraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT tielianyu theintraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT xiaowanguo intraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT yingwang intraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT dongli intraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT chongzhang intraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT yangcao intraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT datongsu intraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod
AT tielianyu intraobservervariabilityofvolumetricmeasurementofpulmonarynodulescomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalmethod