Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review
Abstract Background Successful implementation and utilization of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) in hospitals is complex and challenging. Implementation science, and in particular the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, may offer a s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-07-01
|
Series: | Implementation Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01287-y |
_version_ | 1797769369549275136 |
---|---|
author | Bridget Abell Sundresan Naicker David Rodwell Thomasina Donovan Amina Tariq Melissa Baysari Robin Blythe Rex Parsons Steven M. McPhail |
author_facet | Bridget Abell Sundresan Naicker David Rodwell Thomasina Donovan Amina Tariq Melissa Baysari Robin Blythe Rex Parsons Steven M. McPhail |
author_sort | Bridget Abell |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Successful implementation and utilization of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) in hospitals is complex and challenging. Implementation science, and in particular the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, may offer a systematic approach for identifying and addressing these challenges. This review aimed to identify, categorize, and describe barriers and facilitators to CDSS implementation in hospital settings and map them to the NASSS framework. Exploring the applicability of the NASSS framework to CDSS implementation was a secondary aim. Methods Electronic database searches were conducted (21 July 2020; updated 5 April 2022) in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PyscInfo, and CINAHL. Original research studies reporting on measured or perceived barriers and/or facilitators to implementation and adoption of CDSS in hospital settings, or attitudes of healthcare professionals towards CDSS were included. Articles with a primary focus on CDSS development were excluded. No language or date restrictions were applied. We used qualitative content analysis to identify determinants and organize them into higher-order themes, which were then reflexively mapped to the NASSS framework. Results Forty-four publications were included. These comprised a range of study designs, geographic locations, participants, technology types, CDSS functions, and clinical contexts of implementation. A total of 227 individual barriers and 130 individual facilitators were identified across the included studies. The most commonly reported influences on implementation were fit of CDSS with workflows (19 studies), the usefulness of the CDSS output in practice (17 studies), CDSS technical dependencies and design (16 studies), trust of users in the CDSS input data and evidence base (15 studies), and the contextual fit of the CDSS with the user’s role or clinical setting (14 studies). Most determinants could be appropriately categorized into domains of the NASSS framework with barriers and facilitators in the “Technology,” “Organization,” and “Adopters” domains most frequently reported. No determinants were assigned to the “Embedding and Adaptation Over Time” domain. Conclusions This review identified the most common determinants which could be targeted for modification to either remove barriers or facilitate the adoption and use of CDSS within hospitals. Greater adoption of implementation theory should be encouraged to support CDSS implementation. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:08:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-717097273cf14739b817a768091a6daf |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1748-5908 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T21:08:02Z |
publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Implementation Science |
spelling | doaj.art-717097273cf14739b817a768091a6daf2023-07-30T11:21:15ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082023-07-0118112010.1186/s13012-023-01287-yIdentifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping reviewBridget Abell0Sundresan Naicker1David Rodwell2Thomasina Donovan3Amina Tariq4Melissa Baysari5Robin Blythe6Rex Parsons7Steven M. McPhail8Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyBiomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of SydneyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of TechnologyAbstract Background Successful implementation and utilization of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) in hospitals is complex and challenging. Implementation science, and in particular the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, may offer a systematic approach for identifying and addressing these challenges. This review aimed to identify, categorize, and describe barriers and facilitators to CDSS implementation in hospital settings and map them to the NASSS framework. Exploring the applicability of the NASSS framework to CDSS implementation was a secondary aim. Methods Electronic database searches were conducted (21 July 2020; updated 5 April 2022) in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PyscInfo, and CINAHL. Original research studies reporting on measured or perceived barriers and/or facilitators to implementation and adoption of CDSS in hospital settings, or attitudes of healthcare professionals towards CDSS were included. Articles with a primary focus on CDSS development were excluded. No language or date restrictions were applied. We used qualitative content analysis to identify determinants and organize them into higher-order themes, which were then reflexively mapped to the NASSS framework. Results Forty-four publications were included. These comprised a range of study designs, geographic locations, participants, technology types, CDSS functions, and clinical contexts of implementation. A total of 227 individual barriers and 130 individual facilitators were identified across the included studies. The most commonly reported influences on implementation were fit of CDSS with workflows (19 studies), the usefulness of the CDSS output in practice (17 studies), CDSS technical dependencies and design (16 studies), trust of users in the CDSS input data and evidence base (15 studies), and the contextual fit of the CDSS with the user’s role or clinical setting (14 studies). Most determinants could be appropriately categorized into domains of the NASSS framework with barriers and facilitators in the “Technology,” “Organization,” and “Adopters” domains most frequently reported. No determinants were assigned to the “Embedding and Adaptation Over Time” domain. Conclusions This review identified the most common determinants which could be targeted for modification to either remove barriers or facilitate the adoption and use of CDSS within hospitals. Greater adoption of implementation theory should be encouraged to support CDSS implementation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01287-yBarriers and facilitatorsImplementation scienceCDSSClinical decision support systemsHospitalDigital health |
spellingShingle | Bridget Abell Sundresan Naicker David Rodwell Thomasina Donovan Amina Tariq Melissa Baysari Robin Blythe Rex Parsons Steven M. McPhail Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review Implementation Science Barriers and facilitators Implementation science CDSS Clinical decision support systems Hospital Digital health |
title | Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review |
title_full | Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review |
title_fullStr | Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review |
title_short | Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review |
title_sort | identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals a nasss framework informed scoping review |
topic | Barriers and facilitators Implementation science CDSS Clinical decision support systems Hospital Digital health |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01287-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bridgetabell identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT sundresannaicker identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT davidrodwell identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT thomasinadonovan identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT aminatariq identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT melissabaysari identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT robinblythe identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT rexparsons identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview AT stevenmmcphail identifyingbarriersandfacilitatorstosuccessfulimplementationofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsanasssframeworkinformedscopingreview |