Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture Cages

Salmon lice are one of the biggest challenges to sustainable salmonid aquaculture. The species display high evolutionary potential, which is evident by its development of resistance to numerous chemical compounds used for delousing. In response to this, salmon farms now use non-chemical delousing me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Albert Kjartan Dagbjartarson Imsland, Jon Petter Berg, Velimir Nola, Lena Geitung, Tina Oldham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Fishes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/8/9/455
_version_ 1797580086246899712
author Albert Kjartan Dagbjartarson Imsland
Jon Petter Berg
Velimir Nola
Lena Geitung
Tina Oldham
author_facet Albert Kjartan Dagbjartarson Imsland
Jon Petter Berg
Velimir Nola
Lena Geitung
Tina Oldham
author_sort Albert Kjartan Dagbjartarson Imsland
collection DOAJ
description Salmon lice are one of the biggest challenges to sustainable salmonid aquaculture. The species display high evolutionary potential, which is evident by its development of resistance to numerous chemical compounds used for delousing. In response to this, salmon farms now use non-chemical delousing methods to minimize the damage done by salmon lice, including heavy reliance on cleaner fish. Anecdotal reports from farmers and fish health personnel in areas where cleaner fish are used have suggested that salmon lice are becoming less pigmented, potentially making them harder for cleaner fish to visually detect. This experiment investigated changes in the pigmentation of salmon lice in relation to the use of cleaner fish, louse stage and sex, temperature, preferred salmon swimming depth, daylength, and salinity. Salmon lice were sampled from snorkel cages on a commercial salmon farm where three cages were stocked with farmed lumpfish and ballan wrasse, and three cages were without cleaner fish. Water temperature, salinity, and depth were recorded using a conductivity, temperature, and depth recorder. Pigmentation was measured via photographic analysis of individual lice. Although louse pigmentation varied considerably throughout the experiment, using cleaner fish throughout a single production cycle did not reduce average louse pigmentation compared to control cages. On average, male lice were significantly darker pigmented than females, but otherwise there were no patterns in louse pigmentation in relation to life stage, salinity, temperature, or daylength. Salmon lice exhibit a high degree of evolvability and have become resistant to every chemical removal treatment developed thus far. The present data suggest that, with the densities and species of cleaner fish commonly used in commercial salmon production, there is not strong directional selection on louse pigmentation. Lice, at least with regard to visual appearance, are not likely to adapt in a way which reduces cleaner fish efficacy anytime soon.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:46:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-717fdc5fd7a547be8cc5785811cb68fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2410-3888
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:46:21Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Fishes
spelling doaj.art-717fdc5fd7a547be8cc5785811cb68fc2023-11-19T10:40:55ZengMDPI AGFishes2410-38882023-09-018945510.3390/fishes8090455Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture CagesAlbert Kjartan Dagbjartarson Imsland0Jon Petter Berg1Velimir Nola2Lena Geitung3Tina Oldham4Akvaplan-niva Iceland Office, Akralind 6, 201 Kópavogur, IcelandDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, High Technology Centre, 5020 Bergen, NorwayInstitute of Marine Research, Matre Research Station, 5984 Matredal, NorwayInstitute of Marine Research, Matre Research Station, 5984 Matredal, NorwayInstitute of Marine Research, Matre Research Station, 5984 Matredal, NorwaySalmon lice are one of the biggest challenges to sustainable salmonid aquaculture. The species display high evolutionary potential, which is evident by its development of resistance to numerous chemical compounds used for delousing. In response to this, salmon farms now use non-chemical delousing methods to minimize the damage done by salmon lice, including heavy reliance on cleaner fish. Anecdotal reports from farmers and fish health personnel in areas where cleaner fish are used have suggested that salmon lice are becoming less pigmented, potentially making them harder for cleaner fish to visually detect. This experiment investigated changes in the pigmentation of salmon lice in relation to the use of cleaner fish, louse stage and sex, temperature, preferred salmon swimming depth, daylength, and salinity. Salmon lice were sampled from snorkel cages on a commercial salmon farm where three cages were stocked with farmed lumpfish and ballan wrasse, and three cages were without cleaner fish. Water temperature, salinity, and depth were recorded using a conductivity, temperature, and depth recorder. Pigmentation was measured via photographic analysis of individual lice. Although louse pigmentation varied considerably throughout the experiment, using cleaner fish throughout a single production cycle did not reduce average louse pigmentation compared to control cages. On average, male lice were significantly darker pigmented than females, but otherwise there were no patterns in louse pigmentation in relation to life stage, salinity, temperature, or daylength. Salmon lice exhibit a high degree of evolvability and have become resistant to every chemical removal treatment developed thus far. The present data suggest that, with the densities and species of cleaner fish commonly used in commercial salmon production, there is not strong directional selection on louse pigmentation. Lice, at least with regard to visual appearance, are not likely to adapt in a way which reduces cleaner fish efficacy anytime soon.https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/8/9/455aquaculturesea licepigmentationcleaner fishfish welfare
spellingShingle Albert Kjartan Dagbjartarson Imsland
Jon Petter Berg
Velimir Nola
Lena Geitung
Tina Oldham
Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture Cages
Fishes
aquaculture
sea lice
pigmentation
cleaner fish
fish welfare
title Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture Cages
title_full Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture Cages
title_fullStr Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture Cages
title_full_unstemmed Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture Cages
title_short Cleaner Fish Do Not Impact the Pigmentation of Salmon Lice (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) in Commercial Aquaculture Cages
title_sort cleaner fish do not impact the pigmentation of salmon lice i lepeophtheirus salmonis i in commercial aquaculture cages
topic aquaculture
sea lice
pigmentation
cleaner fish
fish welfare
url https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/8/9/455
work_keys_str_mv AT albertkjartandagbjartarsonimsland cleanerfishdonotimpactthepigmentationofsalmonliceilepeophtheirussalmonisiincommercialaquaculturecages
AT jonpetterberg cleanerfishdonotimpactthepigmentationofsalmonliceilepeophtheirussalmonisiincommercialaquaculturecages
AT velimirnola cleanerfishdonotimpactthepigmentationofsalmonliceilepeophtheirussalmonisiincommercialaquaculturecages
AT lenageitung cleanerfishdonotimpactthepigmentationofsalmonliceilepeophtheirussalmonisiincommercialaquaculturecages
AT tinaoldham cleanerfishdonotimpactthepigmentationofsalmonliceilepeophtheirussalmonisiincommercialaquaculturecages