The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results

In 1965 performance testing was initiated in Finland for the selection of boars for A.I. use. In 1965—68 a total of 147 boars were tested on four local testing stations. The following average results were recorded: backfat thickness 21.6 mm (at a live weight of 88 kg), growth rate 699 g/day, feed ef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elsi Ettala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 1971-01-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71784
_version_ 1818274550245228544
author Elsi Ettala
author_facet Elsi Ettala
author_sort Elsi Ettala
collection DOAJ
description In 1965 performance testing was initiated in Finland for the selection of boars for A.I. use. In 1965—68 a total of 147 boars were tested on four local testing stations. The following average results were recorded: backfat thickness 21.6 mm (at a live weight of 88 kg), growth rate 699 g/day, feed efficiency 2.69 scand. fu/kg growth and testing score (growth + fat) 99.6. The average testing score for boards selected for A.I. use (43 % of tested) was 99.7. Weakness of the legs was noted in 21 % of the boars. The varying initial weights of the male piglets influenced the growth rate very markedly (P < 0.001), and the effect of the initial age was significant with respect to feed efficiency (P < 0.01). The influence of the weight and age at end of test was highly significant with regard to thickness of fat (P < 0.001). Moreover, the weight at end of test affected the testing score significantly (P < 0.001), but the effect of age was eliminated by use of correction factors. The years as well as the testing stations influenced most of the results in a significant manner. The thickness of fat for the Yorkshire boars was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than for the Landrace boars and the former also had a significantly lower testing score. The effect of the genetic variation, influence of sires within breeds, was highly significant (P < 0.001) for all test results. It has thus proved possible to estimate the genetic quality of the boars. The different influences on the test results were analyzed by least squares procedures.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:15:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7196bef5330e479c946ad0a291b9e1e5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:15:38Z
publishDate 1971-01-01
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
record_format Article
series Agricultural and Food Science
spelling doaj.art-7196bef5330e479c946ad0a291b9e1e52022-12-22T00:10:06ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18951971-01-01431The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test resultsElsi Ettala0Department of Animal Breeding, University of HelsinkiIn 1965 performance testing was initiated in Finland for the selection of boars for A.I. use. In 1965—68 a total of 147 boars were tested on four local testing stations. The following average results were recorded: backfat thickness 21.6 mm (at a live weight of 88 kg), growth rate 699 g/day, feed efficiency 2.69 scand. fu/kg growth and testing score (growth + fat) 99.6. The average testing score for boards selected for A.I. use (43 % of tested) was 99.7. Weakness of the legs was noted in 21 % of the boars. The varying initial weights of the male piglets influenced the growth rate very markedly (P < 0.001), and the effect of the initial age was significant with respect to feed efficiency (P < 0.01). The influence of the weight and age at end of test was highly significant with regard to thickness of fat (P < 0.001). Moreover, the weight at end of test affected the testing score significantly (P < 0.001), but the effect of age was eliminated by use of correction factors. The years as well as the testing stations influenced most of the results in a significant manner. The thickness of fat for the Yorkshire boars was significantly greater (P < 0.01) than for the Landrace boars and the former also had a significantly lower testing score. The effect of the genetic variation, influence of sires within breeds, was highly significant (P < 0.001) for all test results. It has thus proved possible to estimate the genetic quality of the boars. The different influences on the test results were analyzed by least squares procedures.https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71784
spellingShingle Elsi Ettala
The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results
Agricultural and Food Science
title The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results
title_full The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results
title_fullStr The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results
title_full_unstemmed The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results
title_short The performance testing of boars I. Performance testing on Finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results
title_sort performance testing of boars i performance testing on finnish experimental stations and genetic and environmental influences on test results
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71784
work_keys_str_mv AT elsiettala theperformancetestingofboarsiperformancetestingonfinnishexperimentalstationsandgeneticandenvironmentalinfluencesontestresults
AT elsiettala performancetestingofboarsiperformancetestingonfinnishexperimentalstationsandgeneticandenvironmentalinfluencesontestresults