Quality Assurance for Spatial Research Data

In Earth System Sciences (ESS), spatial data are increasingly used for impact research and decision-making. To support the stakeholders’ decision, the quality of the spatial data and its assurance play a major role. We present concepts and a workflow to assure the quality of ESS data. Our concepts a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Wagner, Christin Henzen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/11/6/334
_version_ 1797486701520617472
author Michael Wagner
Christin Henzen
author_facet Michael Wagner
Christin Henzen
author_sort Michael Wagner
collection DOAJ
description In Earth System Sciences (ESS), spatial data are increasingly used for impact research and decision-making. To support the stakeholders’ decision, the quality of the spatial data and its assurance play a major role. We present concepts and a workflow to assure the quality of ESS data. Our concepts and workflow are designed along the research data life cycle and include criteria for openness, FAIRness of data (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable), data maturity, and data quality. Existing data maturity concepts describe (community-specific) maturity matrices, e.g., for meteorological data. These concepts assign a variety of maturity metrics to discrete levels to facilitate evaluation of the data. Moreover, the use of easy-to-understand level numbers enables quick recognition of highly mature data, and hence fosters easier reusability. Here, we propose a revised maturity matrix for ESS data including a comprehensive list of FAIR criteria. To foster the compatibility with the developed maturity matrix approach, we developed a spatial data quality matrix that relates the data maturity levels to quality metrics. The maturity and quality levels are then assigned to the phases of the data life cycle. With implementing openness criteria and matrices for data maturity and quality, we build a quality assurance (QA) workflow that comprises various activities and roles. To support researchers in applying this workflow, we implement an interactive questionnaire in the tool RDMO (research data management organizer) to collaboratively manage and monitor all QA activities. This can serve as a blueprint for use-case-specific QA for other datasets. As a proof of concept, we successfully applied our criteria for openness, data maturity, and data quality to the publicly available SPAM2010 (crop distribution) dataset series.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:37:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71a8326cd7474bc78a58040a26bdb982
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2220-9964
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:37:00Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
spelling doaj.art-71a8326cd7474bc78a58040a26bdb9822023-11-23T16:58:58ZengMDPI AGISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2220-99642022-06-0111633410.3390/ijgi11060334Quality Assurance for Spatial Research DataMichael Wagner0Christin Henzen1Center for Information Services and High Performance Computing (ZIH), Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtzstr. 10, 01062 Dresden, GermanyWorking Group Geo UX, German UPA, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtzstr. 10, 01062 Dresden, GermanyIn Earth System Sciences (ESS), spatial data are increasingly used for impact research and decision-making. To support the stakeholders’ decision, the quality of the spatial data and its assurance play a major role. We present concepts and a workflow to assure the quality of ESS data. Our concepts and workflow are designed along the research data life cycle and include criteria for openness, FAIRness of data (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable), data maturity, and data quality. Existing data maturity concepts describe (community-specific) maturity matrices, e.g., for meteorological data. These concepts assign a variety of maturity metrics to discrete levels to facilitate evaluation of the data. Moreover, the use of easy-to-understand level numbers enables quick recognition of highly mature data, and hence fosters easier reusability. Here, we propose a revised maturity matrix for ESS data including a comprehensive list of FAIR criteria. To foster the compatibility with the developed maturity matrix approach, we developed a spatial data quality matrix that relates the data maturity levels to quality metrics. The maturity and quality levels are then assigned to the phases of the data life cycle. With implementing openness criteria and matrices for data maturity and quality, we build a quality assurance (QA) workflow that comprises various activities and roles. To support researchers in applying this workflow, we implement an interactive questionnaire in the tool RDMO (research data management organizer) to collaboratively manage and monitor all QA activities. This can serve as a blueprint for use-case-specific QA for other datasets. As a proof of concept, we successfully applied our criteria for openness, data maturity, and data quality to the publicly available SPAM2010 (crop distribution) dataset series.https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/11/6/334quality assurancedata maturitymaturity matrixspatial data qualityFAIR
spellingShingle Michael Wagner
Christin Henzen
Quality Assurance for Spatial Research Data
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
quality assurance
data maturity
maturity matrix
spatial data quality
FAIR
title Quality Assurance for Spatial Research Data
title_full Quality Assurance for Spatial Research Data
title_fullStr Quality Assurance for Spatial Research Data
title_full_unstemmed Quality Assurance for Spatial Research Data
title_short Quality Assurance for Spatial Research Data
title_sort quality assurance for spatial research data
topic quality assurance
data maturity
maturity matrix
spatial data quality
FAIR
url https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/11/6/334
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelwagner qualityassuranceforspatialresearchdata
AT christinhenzen qualityassuranceforspatialresearchdata