Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine
Theory predicts that because males are more variable in reproductive success than females, a mother should produce more sons to maximize fitness return from the sex allocation if she is of high-quality (the female quality hypothesis) or mates with a high-quality male (the male quality hypothesis). W...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2013-04-01
|
| Series: | Current Zoology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.currentzoology.org/paperdetail.asp?id=12195 |
| _version_ | 1828325663460818944 |
|---|---|
| author | Xin LU, Xianhai ZENG,Bo DU |
| author_facet | Xin LU, Xianhai ZENG,Bo DU |
| author_sort | Xin LU, Xianhai ZENG,Bo DU |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Theory predicts that because males are more variable in reproductive success than females, a mother should produce more sons to maximize fitness return from the sex allocation if she is of high-quality (the female quality hypothesis) or mates with a high-quality male (the male quality hypothesis). While most previous studies have looked at each hypothesis, we tested both of them simultaneously in the white-rumped snowfinch Montifringilla taczanowskii, a socially monogamous, sexually monomorphic passerine where body size is a potential indicator of individual quality in intrasexual competition and territory defense. Brood sex ratios at the population level did not deviate from random expectation. Among individual broods, the proportion of sons did not depend on body size of either male or female parent, but on interaction of this trait of both parents. Further analyses revealed that brood sex ratios were independent of body size of male or female parents when their mates were smaller, but positively related with body size of male or female parents when their mates were larger. These results suggest that mechanisms underlying the two hypotheses may act jointly on offspring sex allocation. The mechanisms are expected to evolve through size-assortative mating which is often reached by sexual selection [Current Zoology 59 (2): 271-277, 2013]. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T19:25:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-71a8c2c8476946e5a60710f1f2756118 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1674-5507 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T19:25:39Z |
| publishDate | 2013-04-01 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Current Zoology |
| spelling | doaj.art-71a8c2c8476946e5a60710f1f27561182022-12-22T02:33:22ZengOxford University PressCurrent Zoology1674-55072013-04-01592271277Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerineXin LU, Xianhai ZENG,Bo DUTheory predicts that because males are more variable in reproductive success than females, a mother should produce more sons to maximize fitness return from the sex allocation if she is of high-quality (the female quality hypothesis) or mates with a high-quality male (the male quality hypothesis). While most previous studies have looked at each hypothesis, we tested both of them simultaneously in the white-rumped snowfinch Montifringilla taczanowskii, a socially monogamous, sexually monomorphic passerine where body size is a potential indicator of individual quality in intrasexual competition and territory defense. Brood sex ratios at the population level did not deviate from random expectation. Among individual broods, the proportion of sons did not depend on body size of either male or female parent, but on interaction of this trait of both parents. Further analyses revealed that brood sex ratios were independent of body size of male or female parents when their mates were smaller, but positively related with body size of male or female parents when their mates were larger. These results suggest that mechanisms underlying the two hypotheses may act jointly on offspring sex allocation. The mechanisms are expected to evolve through size-assortative mating which is often reached by sexual selection [Current Zoology 59 (2): 271-277, 2013].http://www.currentzoology.org/paperdetail.asp?id=12195Brood sex ratioParental qualitySize-assortative matingWhite-rumped snowfinch |
| spellingShingle | Xin LU, Xianhai ZENG,Bo DU Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine Current Zoology Brood sex ratio Parental quality Size-assortative mating White-rumped snowfinch |
| title | Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine |
| title_full | Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine |
| title_fullStr | Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine |
| title_full_unstemmed | Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine |
| title_short | Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine |
| title_sort | body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous size monomorphic passerine |
| topic | Brood sex ratio Parental quality Size-assortative mating White-rumped snowfinch |
| url | http://www.currentzoology.org/paperdetail.asp?id=12195 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xinluxianhaizengbodu bodyattributesofbothparentsjointlyaffectoffspringsexallocationinasociallymonogamoussizemonomorphicpasserine |