Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays

We conducted a rapid bioassay method to assess insecticide efficacy for controlling adult sweetpotato whitefly <i>Bemisia tabaci</i> in squash and cucumber crops before insecticide applications. The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a 24-hour laboratory bioassay in determining maxi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulo S. G. Cremonez, Jermaine D. Perier, Alvin M. Simmons, David G. Riley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Insects
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/6/510
_version_ 1797594210021408768
author Paulo S. G. Cremonez
Jermaine D. Perier
Alvin M. Simmons
David G. Riley
author_facet Paulo S. G. Cremonez
Jermaine D. Perier
Alvin M. Simmons
David G. Riley
author_sort Paulo S. G. Cremonez
collection DOAJ
description We conducted a rapid bioassay method to assess insecticide efficacy for controlling adult sweetpotato whitefly <i>Bemisia tabaci</i> in squash and cucumber crops before insecticide applications. The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a 24-hour laboratory bioassay in determining maximum dose insecticide efficacy in the field. Ten insecticides were evaluated using leaf-dip bioassays, and their effectiveness was tested across eight cucurbit field experiments in Georgia, USA, during the 2021 and 2022 field seasons. The maximum dose, defined as the highest labeled rate of an insecticide diluted in the equivalent of 935 L ha<sup>−1</sup> of water, was used for all bioassays. Adult survival observed in the bioassay was compared to adult field count-based survival 24 h after treatment. A low concentration (1/10 rate) was used for imidacloprid, flupyradifurone, pyriproxyfen, and cyantraniliprole to assess insecticide tolerance in the whitefly population. Overall, significant positive correlation between laboratory bioassay and field efficacy was reported, explaining 50–91% of the observed variation. The addition of the low dosage was helpful, indicating that no rate response was consistent with susceptibility to the tested insecticide, while a rate response was associated with a loss of susceptibility between 2021 and 2022.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:19:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71ae7b52be07482684f6db50b47e53f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4450
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:19:25Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Insects
spelling doaj.art-71ae7b52be07482684f6db50b47e53f22023-11-18T10:55:49ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502023-06-0114651010.3390/insects14060510Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose BioassaysPaulo S. G. Cremonez0Jermaine D. Perier1Alvin M. Simmons2David G. Riley3Department of Entomology, University of Georgia Tifton Campus, Tifton, GA 31793, USADepartment of Entomology, University of Georgia Tifton Campus, Tifton, GA 31793, USAU.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2700 Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29414, USADepartment of Entomology, University of Georgia Tifton Campus, Tifton, GA 31793, USAWe conducted a rapid bioassay method to assess insecticide efficacy for controlling adult sweetpotato whitefly <i>Bemisia tabaci</i> in squash and cucumber crops before insecticide applications. The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a 24-hour laboratory bioassay in determining maximum dose insecticide efficacy in the field. Ten insecticides were evaluated using leaf-dip bioassays, and their effectiveness was tested across eight cucurbit field experiments in Georgia, USA, during the 2021 and 2022 field seasons. The maximum dose, defined as the highest labeled rate of an insecticide diluted in the equivalent of 935 L ha<sup>−1</sup> of water, was used for all bioassays. Adult survival observed in the bioassay was compared to adult field count-based survival 24 h after treatment. A low concentration (1/10 rate) was used for imidacloprid, flupyradifurone, pyriproxyfen, and cyantraniliprole to assess insecticide tolerance in the whitefly population. Overall, significant positive correlation between laboratory bioassay and field efficacy was reported, explaining 50–91% of the observed variation. The addition of the low dosage was helpful, indicating that no rate response was consistent with susceptibility to the tested insecticide, while a rate response was associated with a loss of susceptibility between 2021 and 2022.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/6/510insecticide resistance management (IRM)maximum-dose bioassaysweetpotato whitefly<i>Bemisia tabaci</i>
spellingShingle Paulo S. G. Cremonez
Jermaine D. Perier
Alvin M. Simmons
David G. Riley
Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays
Insects
insecticide resistance management (IRM)
maximum-dose bioassay
sweetpotato whitefly
<i>Bemisia tabaci</i>
title Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays
title_full Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays
title_fullStr Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays
title_full_unstemmed Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays
title_short Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays
title_sort determining field insecticide efficacy on whiteflies with maximum dose bioassays
topic insecticide resistance management (IRM)
maximum-dose bioassay
sweetpotato whitefly
<i>Bemisia tabaci</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/14/6/510
work_keys_str_mv AT paulosgcremonez determiningfieldinsecticideefficacyonwhiteflieswithmaximumdosebioassays
AT jermainedperier determiningfieldinsecticideefficacyonwhiteflieswithmaximumdosebioassays
AT alvinmsimmons determiningfieldinsecticideefficacyonwhiteflieswithmaximumdosebioassays
AT davidgriley determiningfieldinsecticideefficacyonwhiteflieswithmaximumdosebioassays