Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review

Ultrasound (US) is an important imaging tool for skeletal muscle analysis. The advantages of US include point-of-care access, real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation. However, US can be highly dependent on the operator and/or US system, and a portion of the potential...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aria Ashir, Saeed Jerban, Victor Barrère, Yuanshan Wu, Sameer B. Shah, Michael P. Andre, Eric Y. Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4763
_version_ 1827740114366758912
author Aria Ashir
Saeed Jerban
Victor Barrère
Yuanshan Wu
Sameer B. Shah
Michael P. Andre
Eric Y. Chang
author_facet Aria Ashir
Saeed Jerban
Victor Barrère
Yuanshan Wu
Sameer B. Shah
Michael P. Andre
Eric Y. Chang
author_sort Aria Ashir
collection DOAJ
description Ultrasound (US) is an important imaging tool for skeletal muscle analysis. The advantages of US include point-of-care access, real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation. However, US can be highly dependent on the operator and/or US system, and a portion of the potentially useful information carried by raw sonographic data is discarded in image formation for routine qualitative US. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods provide analysis of the raw or post-processed data, revealing additional information about normal tissue structure and disease status. There are four QUS categories that can be used on muscle and are important to review. First, quantitative data derived from B-mode images can help determine the macrostructural anatomy and microstructural morphology of muscle tissues. Second, US elastography can provide information about muscle elasticity or stiffness through strain elastography or shear wave elastography (SWE). Strain elastography measures the induced tissue strain caused either by internal or external compression by tracking tissue displacement with detectable speckle in B-mode images of the examined tissue. SWE measures the speed of induced shear waves traveling through the tissue to estimate the tissue elasticity. These shear waves may be produced using external mechanical vibrations or internal “push pulse” ultrasound stimuli. Third, raw radiofrequency signal analyses provide estimates of fundamental tissue parameters, such as the speed of sound, attenuation coefficient, and backscatter coefficient, which correspond to information about muscle tissue microstructure and composition. Lastly, envelope statistical analyses apply various probability distributions to estimate the number density of scatterers and quantify coherent to incoherent signals, thus providing information about microstructural properties of muscle tissue. This review will examine these QUS techniques, published results on QUS evaluation of skeletal muscles, and the strengths and limitations of QUS in skeletal muscle analysis.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:20:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71bfc0c026924c699ebebb26d340a22d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:20:25Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-71bfc0c026924c699ebebb26d340a22d2023-11-18T03:12:15ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-05-012310476310.3390/s23104763Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative ReviewAria Ashir0Saeed Jerban1Victor Barrère2Yuanshan Wu3Sameer B. Shah4Michael P. Andre5Eric Y. Chang6Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USADepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USAResearch Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USAResearch Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USADepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USADepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USAUltrasound (US) is an important imaging tool for skeletal muscle analysis. The advantages of US include point-of-care access, real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation. However, US can be highly dependent on the operator and/or US system, and a portion of the potentially useful information carried by raw sonographic data is discarded in image formation for routine qualitative US. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods provide analysis of the raw or post-processed data, revealing additional information about normal tissue structure and disease status. There are four QUS categories that can be used on muscle and are important to review. First, quantitative data derived from B-mode images can help determine the macrostructural anatomy and microstructural morphology of muscle tissues. Second, US elastography can provide information about muscle elasticity or stiffness through strain elastography or shear wave elastography (SWE). Strain elastography measures the induced tissue strain caused either by internal or external compression by tracking tissue displacement with detectable speckle in B-mode images of the examined tissue. SWE measures the speed of induced shear waves traveling through the tissue to estimate the tissue elasticity. These shear waves may be produced using external mechanical vibrations or internal “push pulse” ultrasound stimuli. Third, raw radiofrequency signal analyses provide estimates of fundamental tissue parameters, such as the speed of sound, attenuation coefficient, and backscatter coefficient, which correspond to information about muscle tissue microstructure and composition. Lastly, envelope statistical analyses apply various probability distributions to estimate the number density of scatterers and quantify coherent to incoherent signals, thus providing information about microstructural properties of muscle tissue. This review will examine these QUS techniques, published results on QUS evaluation of skeletal muscles, and the strengths and limitations of QUS in skeletal muscle analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4763skeletal muscleultrasoundquantitative ultrasound
spellingShingle Aria Ashir
Saeed Jerban
Victor Barrère
Yuanshan Wu
Sameer B. Shah
Michael P. Andre
Eric Y. Chang
Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
Sensors
skeletal muscle
ultrasound
quantitative ultrasound
title Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
title_full Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
title_short Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
title_sort skeletal muscle assessment using quantitative ultrasound a narrative review
topic skeletal muscle
ultrasound
quantitative ultrasound
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/10/4763
work_keys_str_mv AT ariaashir skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview
AT saeedjerban skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview
AT victorbarrere skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview
AT yuanshanwu skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview
AT sameerbshah skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview
AT michaelpandre skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview
AT ericychang skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview