Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Success of psychosocial interventions in reducing aggressive challenging behaviour is likely to be related not only to mechanistic aspects, but also to therapeutic and system factors. The study aims to examine the facilitators and barriers that influence whether psychosocial intervention...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Athanasia Kouroupa, Aisha Rafiq, Leila Hamza, Penny Rapaport, Angela Hassiotis, Laurence Taggart, Andrew Jahoda, Sally-Ann Cooper, Liz Steed, Louise Marston, Craig Melville, Afia Ali, Rachel Royston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2023-08-01
Series:NIHR Open Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://openresearch.nihr.ac.uk/articles/3-40/v1
_version_ 1797656189422534656
author Athanasia Kouroupa
Aisha Rafiq
Leila Hamza
Penny Rapaport
Angela Hassiotis
Laurence Taggart
Andrew Jahoda
Sally-Ann Cooper
Liz Steed
Louise Marston
Craig Melville
Afia Ali
Rachel Royston
author_facet Athanasia Kouroupa
Aisha Rafiq
Leila Hamza
Penny Rapaport
Angela Hassiotis
Laurence Taggart
Andrew Jahoda
Sally-Ann Cooper
Liz Steed
Louise Marston
Craig Melville
Afia Ali
Rachel Royston
author_sort Athanasia Kouroupa
collection DOAJ
description Background: Success of psychosocial interventions in reducing aggressive challenging behaviour is likely to be related not only to mechanistic aspects, but also to therapeutic and system factors. The study aims to examine the facilitators and barriers that influence whether psychosocial interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities lead to positive change. Methods: We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with adults with intellectual disabilities and aggressive challenging behaviour, family/paid carers, and professionals engaged in or delivering a psychosocial intervention across the UK. Data were analysed thematically using a framework approach. Results: Stakeholders considered therapeutic and supportive relationships and personalised care as facilitating factors of psychosocial interventions to address aggressive challenging behaviour. The operational structure of community intellectual disability services and conflicting expectations of professionals and carers were the main contextual barriers that impeded the implementation of psychosocial interventions addressing aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities. Conclusions: Findings highlight the valued components that maximise positive change in adults with intellectual disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour. Several operational adjustments including referral criteria, roles of professionals and workforce issues need to be addressed in services to maximise the implementation of psychosocial interventions to reduce aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:26:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71e99679d7d7435a80fb8ab0de4e196e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2633-4402
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T17:26:41Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series NIHR Open Research
spelling doaj.art-71e99679d7d7435a80fb8ab0de4e196e2023-10-19T00:00:00ZengF1000 Research LtdNIHR Open Research2633-44022023-08-01314575Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]Athanasia Kouroupa0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-160XAisha Rafiq1Leila Hamza2Penny Rapaport3Angela Hassiotis4Laurence Taggart5Andrew Jahoda6Sally-Ann Cooper7Liz Steed8Louise Marston9https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9973-1131Craig Melville10Afia Ali11Rachel Royston12https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9901-2284Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, England, UKDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, England, UKAssessment and Intervention Team, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, England, UKDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, England, UKDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, England, UKUlster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UKSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UKSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UKCentre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UKDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, England, UKSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UKUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UKDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, England, UKBackground: Success of psychosocial interventions in reducing aggressive challenging behaviour is likely to be related not only to mechanistic aspects, but also to therapeutic and system factors. The study aims to examine the facilitators and barriers that influence whether psychosocial interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities lead to positive change. Methods: We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with adults with intellectual disabilities and aggressive challenging behaviour, family/paid carers, and professionals engaged in or delivering a psychosocial intervention across the UK. Data were analysed thematically using a framework approach. Results: Stakeholders considered therapeutic and supportive relationships and personalised care as facilitating factors of psychosocial interventions to address aggressive challenging behaviour. The operational structure of community intellectual disability services and conflicting expectations of professionals and carers were the main contextual barriers that impeded the implementation of psychosocial interventions addressing aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities. Conclusions: Findings highlight the valued components that maximise positive change in adults with intellectual disabilities who display aggressive challenging behaviour. Several operational adjustments including referral criteria, roles of professionals and workforce issues need to be addressed in services to maximise the implementation of psychosocial interventions to reduce aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities.https://openresearch.nihr.ac.uk/articles/3-40/v1Intellectual disabilities aggression challenging behaviour qualitative methods community care interventionseng
spellingShingle Athanasia Kouroupa
Aisha Rafiq
Leila Hamza
Penny Rapaport
Angela Hassiotis
Laurence Taggart
Andrew Jahoda
Sally-Ann Cooper
Liz Steed
Louise Marston
Craig Melville
Afia Ali
Rachel Royston
Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
NIHR Open Research
Intellectual disabilities
aggression
challenging behaviour
qualitative methods
community care
interventions
eng
title Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort stakeholder views on the barriers and facilitators of psychosocial interventions to address reduction in aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities version 1 peer review 2 approved
topic Intellectual disabilities
aggression
challenging behaviour
qualitative methods
community care
interventions
eng
url https://openresearch.nihr.ac.uk/articles/3-40/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT athanasiakouroupa stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT aisharafiq stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT leilahamza stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT pennyrapaport stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT angelahassiotis stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT laurencetaggart stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT andrewjahoda stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT sallyanncooper stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT lizsteed stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT louisemarston stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT craigmelville stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT afiaali stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved
AT rachelroyston stakeholderviewsonthebarriersandfacilitatorsofpsychosocialinterventionstoaddressreductioninaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesversion1peerreview2approved