Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems

Background: Various Thyroid Imaging and Reporting data systems (TIRADS) are used worldwide for risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Their sensitivity is high, while the specificity is suboptimal. The aim of the study was to compare several TIRADS systems and evaluate the effect of hypoechogenicit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina Malika Popova, Maija Radzina, Peteris Prieditis, Mara Liepa, Madara Rauda, Kaspars Stepanovs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/21/5581
_version_ 1797512641618378752
author Nina Malika Popova
Maija Radzina
Peteris Prieditis
Mara Liepa
Madara Rauda
Kaspars Stepanovs
author_facet Nina Malika Popova
Maija Radzina
Peteris Prieditis
Mara Liepa
Madara Rauda
Kaspars Stepanovs
author_sort Nina Malika Popova
collection DOAJ
description Background: Various Thyroid Imaging and Reporting data systems (TIRADS) are used worldwide for risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Their sensitivity is high, while the specificity is suboptimal. The aim of the study was to compare several TIRADS systems and evaluate the effect of hypoechogenicity as a sign of risk of malignancy on the overall assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Methods: The prospective study includes 274 patients with 289 thyroid nodules to whom US and risk of malignancy were assessed according to four TIRADS systems—European (EU-TIRADS), Korean (K-TIRADS), TIRADS by American College of Radiology (ACR TIRADS), and modified Kwak et al. TIRADS (L-TIRADS) systems, in which mild hypoechogenicity is not included in malignancy risk suggestive signs. For all thyroid nodules, a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed and evaluated according to the Bethesda system. For all systems, diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results: Assessing the echogenicity of the thyroid nodules: from 81 of isoechogenic nodules, 2 were malignant (2.1%), from 151 mild hypoechogenic, 18 (12%) were malignant, and from 48 marked hypoechogenic nodules, 16 (33%) were malignant. In 80 thyroid nodules, mild hypoechogenicity was the only sign of malignancy and none appeared malignant. Assessing various TIRADS systems on the same cohort, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy, firstly for EU-TIRADS, they were 97.2%; 39.9%; 18.7%; 99.0%, and 73.3%, respectively; for K-TIRADS they were 97.2%; 46.6%; 20.6%; 99.2%, and 53.9%; for ACR-TIRADS they were 97.2%; 41.1%, 19.0%; 99.0%, and 48.0%, respectively; finally, for L-TIRADS they were 80.6%; 72.7%; 29.6%; 96.3%, and 73.3%. Conclusions: This comparative research has highlighted that applying different TIRADS systems can alter the number of necessary biopsies by re-categorization of the thyroid nodules. The main pattern that affected differences was inconsistent hypoechogenicity interpretation, giving the accuracy superiority to the systems that raise the malignancy risk with marked hypoechogenicity, at the same time with minor compensation for sensitivity.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:04:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71f4e742de7c4122af19310e740f6407
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:04:38Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-71f4e742de7c4122af19310e740f64072023-11-22T20:37:22ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942021-11-011321558110.3390/cancers13215581Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS SystemsNina Malika Popova0Maija Radzina1Peteris Prieditis2Mara Liepa3Madara Rauda4Kaspars Stepanovs5Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, 1002 Riga, LatviaInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, 1002 Riga, LatviaInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, 1002 Riga, LatviaInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, 1002 Riga, LatviaInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, 1002 Riga, LatviaInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, 1002 Riga, LatviaBackground: Various Thyroid Imaging and Reporting data systems (TIRADS) are used worldwide for risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Their sensitivity is high, while the specificity is suboptimal. The aim of the study was to compare several TIRADS systems and evaluate the effect of hypoechogenicity as a sign of risk of malignancy on the overall assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Methods: The prospective study includes 274 patients with 289 thyroid nodules to whom US and risk of malignancy were assessed according to four TIRADS systems—European (EU-TIRADS), Korean (K-TIRADS), TIRADS by American College of Radiology (ACR TIRADS), and modified Kwak et al. TIRADS (L-TIRADS) systems, in which mild hypoechogenicity is not included in malignancy risk suggestive signs. For all thyroid nodules, a fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed and evaluated according to the Bethesda system. For all systems, diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results: Assessing the echogenicity of the thyroid nodules: from 81 of isoechogenic nodules, 2 were malignant (2.1%), from 151 mild hypoechogenic, 18 (12%) were malignant, and from 48 marked hypoechogenic nodules, 16 (33%) were malignant. In 80 thyroid nodules, mild hypoechogenicity was the only sign of malignancy and none appeared malignant. Assessing various TIRADS systems on the same cohort, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy, firstly for EU-TIRADS, they were 97.2%; 39.9%; 18.7%; 99.0%, and 73.3%, respectively; for K-TIRADS they were 97.2%; 46.6%; 20.6%; 99.2%, and 53.9%; for ACR-TIRADS they were 97.2%; 41.1%, 19.0%; 99.0%, and 48.0%, respectively; finally, for L-TIRADS they were 80.6%; 72.7%; 29.6%; 96.3%, and 73.3%. Conclusions: This comparative research has highlighted that applying different TIRADS systems can alter the number of necessary biopsies by re-categorization of the thyroid nodules. The main pattern that affected differences was inconsistent hypoechogenicity interpretation, giving the accuracy superiority to the systems that raise the malignancy risk with marked hypoechogenicity, at the same time with minor compensation for sensitivity.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/21/5581TIRADSthyroid noduleultrasoundfine-needle aspiration biopsy
spellingShingle Nina Malika Popova
Maija Radzina
Peteris Prieditis
Mara Liepa
Madara Rauda
Kaspars Stepanovs
Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems
Cancers
TIRADS
thyroid nodule
ultrasound
fine-needle aspiration biopsy
title Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems
title_full Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems
title_fullStr Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems
title_short Impact of the Hypoechogenicity Criteria on Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification Performance by Different TIRADS Systems
title_sort impact of the hypoechogenicity criteria on thyroid nodule malignancy risk stratification performance by different tirads systems
topic TIRADS
thyroid nodule
ultrasound
fine-needle aspiration biopsy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/21/5581
work_keys_str_mv AT ninamalikapopova impactofthehypoechogenicitycriteriaonthyroidnodulemalignancyriskstratificationperformancebydifferenttiradssystems
AT maijaradzina impactofthehypoechogenicitycriteriaonthyroidnodulemalignancyriskstratificationperformancebydifferenttiradssystems
AT peterisprieditis impactofthehypoechogenicitycriteriaonthyroidnodulemalignancyriskstratificationperformancebydifferenttiradssystems
AT maraliepa impactofthehypoechogenicitycriteriaonthyroidnodulemalignancyriskstratificationperformancebydifferenttiradssystems
AT madararauda impactofthehypoechogenicitycriteriaonthyroidnodulemalignancyriskstratificationperformancebydifferenttiradssystems
AT kasparsstepanovs impactofthehypoechogenicitycriteriaonthyroidnodulemalignancyriskstratificationperformancebydifferenttiradssystems