Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVE: The clinical differential diagnosis of rash due to viral infections is often difficult, and misdiagnosis is not rare, especially after the introduction of measles and rubella vaccination. A study to determine the etiological diagnosis of exanthema was carried out in a group of children af...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria I Oliveira, Suely P Curti, Cristina A Figueiredo, Ana MS Afonso, Márcia Theobaldo, Raymundo S Azevedo, Edison L Durigon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo
Series:Revista de Saúde Pública
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102002000200006&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818455252619231232
author Maria I Oliveira
Suely P Curti
Cristina A Figueiredo
Ana MS Afonso
Márcia Theobaldo
Raymundo S Azevedo
Edison L Durigon
author_facet Maria I Oliveira
Suely P Curti
Cristina A Figueiredo
Ana MS Afonso
Márcia Theobaldo
Raymundo S Azevedo
Edison L Durigon
author_sort Maria I Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: The clinical differential diagnosis of rash due to viral infections is often difficult, and misdiagnosis is not rare, especially after the introduction of measles and rubella vaccination. A study to determine the etiological diagnosis of exanthema was carried out in a group of children after measles vaccination. METHODS: Sera collected from children with rash who received measles vaccine were reported in 1999. They were analyzed for IgM antibodies against measles virus, rubella virus, human parvovirus B19 (HPV B19) using ELISA commercial techniques, and human herpes virus 6 (HHV 6) using immunofluorescence commercial technique. Viremia for each of those viruses was tested using a polimerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: A total of 17 cases of children with exanthema after measles immunization were reported in 1999. The children, aged 9 to 12 months (median 10 months), had a blood sample taken for laboratory analysis. The time between vaccination and the first rash signs varied from 1 to 60 days. The serological results of those 17 children suspected of measles or rubella infection showed the following etiological diagnosis: 17.6% (3 in 17) HPV B19 infection; 76.5% (13 in 17) HHV 6 infection; 5.9% (1 in 17) rash due to measles vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The study data indicate that infection due to HPV B19 or HHV 6 can be misdiagnosed as exanthema due to measles vaccination. Therefore, it is important to better characterize the etiology of rash in order to avoid attributing it incorrectly to measles vaccine.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:07:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-71f82537258f474c8db7b8b88ba211bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0034-8910
1518-8787
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:07:49Z
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
record_format Article
series Revista de Saúde Pública
spelling doaj.art-71f82537258f474c8db7b8b88ba211bd2022-12-21T22:45:50ZengUniversidade de São PauloRevista de Saúde Pública0034-89101518-8787362155159S0034-89102002000200006Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, BrazilMaria I Oliveira0Suely P Curti1Cristina A Figueiredo2Ana MS Afonso3Márcia Theobaldo4Raymundo S Azevedo5Edison L Durigon6Instituto Adolfo LutzInstituto Adolfo LutzInstituto Adolfo LutzInstituto Adolfo LutzInstituto Adolfo LutzUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloOBJECTIVE: The clinical differential diagnosis of rash due to viral infections is often difficult, and misdiagnosis is not rare, especially after the introduction of measles and rubella vaccination. A study to determine the etiological diagnosis of exanthema was carried out in a group of children after measles vaccination. METHODS: Sera collected from children with rash who received measles vaccine were reported in 1999. They were analyzed for IgM antibodies against measles virus, rubella virus, human parvovirus B19 (HPV B19) using ELISA commercial techniques, and human herpes virus 6 (HHV 6) using immunofluorescence commercial technique. Viremia for each of those viruses was tested using a polimerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: A total of 17 cases of children with exanthema after measles immunization were reported in 1999. The children, aged 9 to 12 months (median 10 months), had a blood sample taken for laboratory analysis. The time between vaccination and the first rash signs varied from 1 to 60 days. The serological results of those 17 children suspected of measles or rubella infection showed the following etiological diagnosis: 17.6% (3 in 17) HPV B19 infection; 76.5% (13 in 17) HHV 6 infection; 5.9% (1 in 17) rash due to measles vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: The study data indicate that infection due to HPV B19 or HHV 6 can be misdiagnosed as exanthema due to measles vaccination. Therefore, it is important to better characterize the etiology of rash in order to avoid attributing it incorrectly to measles vaccine.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102002000200006&lng=en&tlng=envacinação do sarampoparvovírus humano b19herpes vírus humano 6exantemarubéolasarampo
spellingShingle Maria I Oliveira
Suely P Curti
Cristina A Figueiredo
Ana MS Afonso
Márcia Theobaldo
Raymundo S Azevedo
Edison L Durigon
Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, Brazil
Revista de Saúde Pública
vacinação do sarampo
parvovírus humano b19
herpes vírus humano 6
exantema
rubéola
sarampo
title Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, Brazil
title_full Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, Brazil
title_fullStr Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, Brazil
title_short Rash after measles vaccination: laboratory analysis of cases reported in São Paulo, Brazil
title_sort rash after measles vaccination laboratory analysis of cases reported in sao paulo brazil
topic vacinação do sarampo
parvovírus humano b19
herpes vírus humano 6
exantema
rubéola
sarampo
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102002000200006&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaioliveira rashaftermeaslesvaccinationlaboratoryanalysisofcasesreportedinsaopaulobrazil
AT suelypcurti rashaftermeaslesvaccinationlaboratoryanalysisofcasesreportedinsaopaulobrazil
AT cristinaafigueiredo rashaftermeaslesvaccinationlaboratoryanalysisofcasesreportedinsaopaulobrazil
AT anamsafonso rashaftermeaslesvaccinationlaboratoryanalysisofcasesreportedinsaopaulobrazil
AT marciatheobaldo rashaftermeaslesvaccinationlaboratoryanalysisofcasesreportedinsaopaulobrazil
AT raymundosazevedo rashaftermeaslesvaccinationlaboratoryanalysisofcasesreportedinsaopaulobrazil
AT edisonldurigon rashaftermeaslesvaccinationlaboratoryanalysisofcasesreportedinsaopaulobrazil