A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water Flow

Different techniques are used to analyze annular flow, but the more interesting ones are those techniques that do not perturb the flow and provide enough resolution to clearly distinguish the interfacial phenomena that take place at the interface, especially the disturbance waves (DW) and the ripple...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yago Rivera, Maxime Bidon, José-Luis Muñoz-Cobo, Cesar Berna, Alberto Escrivá
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/20/8617
_version_ 1797572259764764672
author Yago Rivera
Maxime Bidon
José-Luis Muñoz-Cobo
Cesar Berna
Alberto Escrivá
author_facet Yago Rivera
Maxime Bidon
José-Luis Muñoz-Cobo
Cesar Berna
Alberto Escrivá
author_sort Yago Rivera
collection DOAJ
description Different techniques are used to analyze annular flow, but the more interesting ones are those techniques that do not perturb the flow and provide enough resolution to clearly distinguish the interfacial phenomena that take place at the interface, especially the disturbance waves (DW) and the ripple waves (DW). The understanding of these events is important because it influences the heat and mass transfer taking place through the thin film formed near the walls in this flow regime. The laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) and the three-electrode conductance probe are two commonly used techniques to study experimentally annular flow phenomena. In this paper, a set of experiments at different temperatures of 20 °C, 30 °C and 40 °C and different liquid Reynolds numbers have been performed in the annular flow regime, the characteristic of the DW and RW as average height and frequency of these waves has been measured by both techniques LIF and conductance probes. In addition, we also measured the mean film thickness. It was found that the mean film thickness and the DW height are practically the same when measured by both techniques; however, the height of the RW is smaller when measured by the conductance probe and this difference diminishes when the temperature increases.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:53:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7202ddd90543457ea3d6bab43e9eb92a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:53:42Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-7202ddd90543457ea3d6bab43e9eb92a2023-11-19T18:05:39ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-10-012320861710.3390/s23208617A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water FlowYago Rivera0Maxime Bidon1José-Luis Muñoz-Cobo2Cesar Berna3Alberto Escrivá4IIE Instituto de Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, SpainENSEA—École Nationale Supérieur d’Électronique et de ses Applications, 95000 Cergy, FranceIIE Instituto de Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, SpainIIE Instituto de Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, SpainIIE Instituto de Ingeniería Energética, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, SpainDifferent techniques are used to analyze annular flow, but the more interesting ones are those techniques that do not perturb the flow and provide enough resolution to clearly distinguish the interfacial phenomena that take place at the interface, especially the disturbance waves (DW) and the ripple waves (DW). The understanding of these events is important because it influences the heat and mass transfer taking place through the thin film formed near the walls in this flow regime. The laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) and the three-electrode conductance probe are two commonly used techniques to study experimentally annular flow phenomena. In this paper, a set of experiments at different temperatures of 20 °C, 30 °C and 40 °C and different liquid Reynolds numbers have been performed in the annular flow regime, the characteristic of the DW and RW as average height and frequency of these waves has been measured by both techniques LIF and conductance probes. In addition, we also measured the mean film thickness. It was found that the mean film thickness and the DW height are practically the same when measured by both techniques; however, the height of the RW is smaller when measured by the conductance probe and this difference diminishes when the temperature increases.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/20/8617conductance probesannular flowhigh-speed camera measurementslaser-induced fluorescence measurements
spellingShingle Yago Rivera
Maxime Bidon
José-Luis Muñoz-Cobo
Cesar Berna
Alberto Escrivá
A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water Flow
Sensors
conductance probes
annular flow
high-speed camera measurements
laser-induced fluorescence measurements
title A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water Flow
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water Flow
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water Flow
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water Flow
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Conductance Probes and High-Speed Camera Measurements for Interfacial Behavior in Annular Air–Water Flow
title_sort comparative analysis of conductance probes and high speed camera measurements for interfacial behavior in annular air water flow
topic conductance probes
annular flow
high-speed camera measurements
laser-induced fluorescence measurements
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/20/8617
work_keys_str_mv AT yagorivera acomparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT maximebidon acomparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT joseluismunozcobo acomparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT cesarberna acomparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT albertoescriva acomparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT yagorivera comparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT maximebidon comparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT joseluismunozcobo comparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT cesarberna comparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow
AT albertoescriva comparativeanalysisofconductanceprobesandhighspeedcamerameasurementsforinterfacialbehaviorinannularairwaterflow