Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based Materials

Energy harvesting systems for low-power devices are increasingly being a requirement within the context of the Internet of Things and, in particular, for self-powered sensors in remote or inaccessible locations. Triboelectric nanogenerators are a suitable approach for harvesting environmental mechan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiago Rodrigues-Marinho, Nelson Castro, Vitor Correia, Pedro Costa, Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/21/4980
_version_ 1797548750195916800
author Tiago Rodrigues-Marinho
Nelson Castro
Vitor Correia
Pedro Costa
Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez
author_facet Tiago Rodrigues-Marinho
Nelson Castro
Vitor Correia
Pedro Costa
Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez
author_sort Tiago Rodrigues-Marinho
collection DOAJ
description Energy harvesting systems for low-power devices are increasingly being a requirement within the context of the Internet of Things and, in particular, for self-powered sensors in remote or inaccessible locations. Triboelectric nanogenerators are a suitable approach for harvesting environmental mechanical energy otherwise wasted in nature. This work reports on the evaluation of the output power of different polymer and polymer composites, by using the triboelectric contact-separation systems (10 N of force followed by 5 cm of separation per cycle). Different materials were used as positive (Mica, polyamide (PA66) and styrene/ethylene-butadiene/styrene (SEBS)) and negative (polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyurethane (PU), polypropylene (PP) and Kapton) charge materials. The obtained output power ranges from 0.2 to 5.9 mW, depending on the pair of materials, for an active area of 46.4 cm<sup>2</sup>. The highest response was obtained for Mica with PVDF composites with 30 wt.% of barium titanate (BT) and PA66 with PU pairs. A simple application has been developed based on vertical contact-separation mode, able to power up light emission diodes (LEDs) with around 30 cycles to charge a capacitor. Further, the capacitor can be charged in one triboelectric cycle if an area of 0.14 m<sup>2</sup> is used.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:04:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7212be95a1f84fbb8cd70046f4a497f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:04:06Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-7212be95a1f84fbb8cd70046f4a497f72023-11-20T19:54:03ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442020-11-011321498010.3390/ma13214980Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based MaterialsTiago Rodrigues-Marinho0Nelson Castro1Vitor Correia2Pedro Costa3Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez4Center of Physics, Campus Gualtar, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalBCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, UPV/EHU Science Park, 48940 Leioa, SpainCenter of Physics, Campus Gualtar, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalCenter of Physics, Campus Gualtar, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, PortugalBCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, UPV/EHU Science Park, 48940 Leioa, SpainEnergy harvesting systems for low-power devices are increasingly being a requirement within the context of the Internet of Things and, in particular, for self-powered sensors in remote or inaccessible locations. Triboelectric nanogenerators are a suitable approach for harvesting environmental mechanical energy otherwise wasted in nature. This work reports on the evaluation of the output power of different polymer and polymer composites, by using the triboelectric contact-separation systems (10 N of force followed by 5 cm of separation per cycle). Different materials were used as positive (Mica, polyamide (PA66) and styrene/ethylene-butadiene/styrene (SEBS)) and negative (polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyurethane (PU), polypropylene (PP) and Kapton) charge materials. The obtained output power ranges from 0.2 to 5.9 mW, depending on the pair of materials, for an active area of 46.4 cm<sup>2</sup>. The highest response was obtained for Mica with PVDF composites with 30 wt.% of barium titanate (BT) and PA66 with PU pairs. A simple application has been developed based on vertical contact-separation mode, able to power up light emission diodes (LEDs) with around 30 cycles to charge a capacitor. Further, the capacitor can be charged in one triboelectric cycle if an area of 0.14 m<sup>2</sup> is used.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/21/4980triboelectric effectpolymer and compositesenergy harvestinglow-power devices
spellingShingle Tiago Rodrigues-Marinho
Nelson Castro
Vitor Correia
Pedro Costa
Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez
Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based Materials
Materials
triboelectric effect
polymer and composites
energy harvesting
low-power devices
title Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based Materials
title_full Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based Materials
title_fullStr Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based Materials
title_full_unstemmed Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based Materials
title_short Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Response of Different Polymer-Based Materials
title_sort triboelectric energy harvesting response of different polymer based materials
topic triboelectric effect
polymer and composites
energy harvesting
low-power devices
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/21/4980
work_keys_str_mv AT tiagorodriguesmarinho triboelectricenergyharvestingresponseofdifferentpolymerbasedmaterials
AT nelsoncastro triboelectricenergyharvestingresponseofdifferentpolymerbasedmaterials
AT vitorcorreia triboelectricenergyharvestingresponseofdifferentpolymerbasedmaterials
AT pedrocosta triboelectricenergyharvestingresponseofdifferentpolymerbasedmaterials
AT senentxulancerosmendez triboelectricenergyharvestingresponseofdifferentpolymerbasedmaterials