Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers

Purpose: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treatment has varying practice patterns with poor outcomes. We investigated treatment using single-agent chemotherapy and multiagent chemotherapy (MAC) with or without radiation therapy (RT) at high-volume facilities (HVFs) and academic centers (ACs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John M. David, MD, Sungjin Kim, MS, Veronica R. Placencio-Hickok, PhD, Arman Torosian, BS, Andrew Hendifar, MD, Richard Tuli, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-04-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109418302318
_version_ 1819145483783766016
author John M. David, MD
Sungjin Kim, MS
Veronica R. Placencio-Hickok, PhD
Arman Torosian, BS
Andrew Hendifar, MD
Richard Tuli, MD, PhD
author_facet John M. David, MD
Sungjin Kim, MS
Veronica R. Placencio-Hickok, PhD
Arman Torosian, BS
Andrew Hendifar, MD
Richard Tuli, MD, PhD
author_sort John M. David, MD
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treatment has varying practice patterns with poor outcomes. We investigated treatment using single-agent chemotherapy and multiagent chemotherapy (MAC) with or without radiation therapy (RT) at high-volume facilities (HVFs) and academic centers (ACs). Methods and Materials: The National Cancer Database was used to obtain data on 10,139 patients with LAPC. HVF was defined as the top 5% of facilities per number of patients treated at each facility. Univariate and multivariable (MVA) analysis Cox regressions were performed to identify the impact of HVF, AC, MAC, and RT on overall survival (OS). Results: The median age of patients was 66 years (range, 22-90); 50.1% were male and 49.9% female. Of the patients, 46.1% received MAC, 53.8% received single-agent chemotherapy, 45.7% received RT, 54.3% did not receive RT, and 5% underwent surgical resection. The median follow-up was 48.8 months. On MVA, treatment at HVFs and ACs remained significantly associated with improved OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 (P < .001) and 0.94 (P = .004), respectively. The median OS for HVF treatment compared with low-volume facilities was 14.3 versus 11.2 months, respectively (P < .001). The median OS for AC treatment versus non-AC was 12.1 versus 10.8 months, respectively (P < .001). Additionally, on MVA, receipt of RT and MAC remained significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.76; P < .001; and HR: 0.73; P < .001, respectively). MVA for receipt of surgery showed that MAC is a significant predictor for receiving surgery (odds ratio: 1.29; P = .009). Conclusions: Our results build on a growing literature supporting RT and MAC in treating LAPC. Additionally, we believe that—in the absence of prospective data—this makes a strong case for considering MAC with RT at ACs and HVFs for treating LAPC.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T12:58:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-722c83ef6583400cab20bfe3d42179e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2452-1094
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T12:58:45Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-722c83ef6583400cab20bfe3d42179e92022-12-21T18:25:02ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942019-04-0142302313Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centersJohn M. David, MD0Sungjin Kim, MS1Veronica R. Placencio-Hickok, PhD2Arman Torosian, BS3Andrew Hendifar, MD4Richard Tuli, MD, PhD5Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CaliforniaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CaliforniaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CaliforniaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CaliforniaSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CaliforniaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048.Purpose: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treatment has varying practice patterns with poor outcomes. We investigated treatment using single-agent chemotherapy and multiagent chemotherapy (MAC) with or without radiation therapy (RT) at high-volume facilities (HVFs) and academic centers (ACs). Methods and Materials: The National Cancer Database was used to obtain data on 10,139 patients with LAPC. HVF was defined as the top 5% of facilities per number of patients treated at each facility. Univariate and multivariable (MVA) analysis Cox regressions were performed to identify the impact of HVF, AC, MAC, and RT on overall survival (OS). Results: The median age of patients was 66 years (range, 22-90); 50.1% were male and 49.9% female. Of the patients, 46.1% received MAC, 53.8% received single-agent chemotherapy, 45.7% received RT, 54.3% did not receive RT, and 5% underwent surgical resection. The median follow-up was 48.8 months. On MVA, treatment at HVFs and ACs remained significantly associated with improved OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 (P < .001) and 0.94 (P = .004), respectively. The median OS for HVF treatment compared with low-volume facilities was 14.3 versus 11.2 months, respectively (P < .001). The median OS for AC treatment versus non-AC was 12.1 versus 10.8 months, respectively (P < .001). Additionally, on MVA, receipt of RT and MAC remained significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.76; P < .001; and HR: 0.73; P < .001, respectively). MVA for receipt of surgery showed that MAC is a significant predictor for receiving surgery (odds ratio: 1.29; P = .009). Conclusions: Our results build on a growing literature supporting RT and MAC in treating LAPC. Additionally, we believe that—in the absence of prospective data—this makes a strong case for considering MAC with RT at ACs and HVFs for treating LAPC.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109418302318
spellingShingle John M. David, MD
Sungjin Kim, MS
Veronica R. Placencio-Hickok, PhD
Arman Torosian, BS
Andrew Hendifar, MD
Richard Tuli, MD, PhD
Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers
title_full Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers
title_fullStr Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers
title_full_unstemmed Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers
title_short Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers
title_sort treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high volume facilities and academic centers
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109418302318
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmdavidmd treatmentstrategiesandclinicaloutcomesoflocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatientstreatedathighvolumefacilitiesandacademiccenters
AT sungjinkimms treatmentstrategiesandclinicaloutcomesoflocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatientstreatedathighvolumefacilitiesandacademiccenters
AT veronicarplacenciohickokphd treatmentstrategiesandclinicaloutcomesoflocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatientstreatedathighvolumefacilitiesandacademiccenters
AT armantorosianbs treatmentstrategiesandclinicaloutcomesoflocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatientstreatedathighvolumefacilitiesandacademiccenters
AT andrewhendifarmd treatmentstrategiesandclinicaloutcomesoflocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatientstreatedathighvolumefacilitiesandacademiccenters
AT richardtulimdphd treatmentstrategiesandclinicaloutcomesoflocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatientstreatedathighvolumefacilitiesandacademiccenters