On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a reply

We welcome the response of Chris Tompsett and Graham Alsop to our article (Lisewski and Joyce, 2003). Within its 'stricter analysis', it is thoughtful and incisive, presenting an interesting critique of our ideas. However, we cannot help but think that the authors have missed t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Joyce, Bernard Lisewski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Learning Technology 2003-12-01
Series:Research in Learning Technology
Online Access:http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11278
_version_ 1811287182801895424
author Paul Joyce
Bernard Lisewski
author_facet Paul Joyce
Bernard Lisewski
author_sort Paul Joyce
collection DOAJ
description We welcome the response of Chris Tompsett and Graham Alsop to our article (Lisewski and Joyce, 2003). Within its 'stricter analysis', it is thoughtful and incisive, presenting an interesting critique of our ideas. However, we cannot help but think that the authors have missed the point. Indeed, if we wish to be mischievous we woidd argue that their response is an exemplar of some of the concerns we wanted to raise in our original article
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:14:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72318fadb7074322a44741d015d6e7ad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2156-7069
2156-7077
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T03:14:07Z
publishDate 2003-12-01
publisher Association for Learning Technology
record_format Article
series Research in Learning Technology
spelling doaj.art-72318fadb7074322a44741d015d6e7ad2022-12-22T03:04:58ZengAssociation for Learning TechnologyResearch in Learning Technology2156-70692156-70772003-12-0111210.3402/rlt.v11i2.11278On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a replyPaul JoyceBernard LisewskiWe welcome the response of Chris Tompsett and Graham Alsop to our article (Lisewski and Joyce, 2003). Within its 'stricter analysis', it is thoughtful and incisive, presenting an interesting critique of our ideas. However, we cannot help but think that the authors have missed the point. Indeed, if we wish to be mischievous we woidd argue that their response is an exemplar of some of the concerns we wanted to raise in our original articlehttp://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11278
spellingShingle Paul Joyce
Bernard Lisewski
On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a reply
Research in Learning Technology
title On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a reply
title_full On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a reply
title_fullStr On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a reply
title_full_unstemmed On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a reply
title_short On reification: a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice - a reply
title_sort on reification a reinterpretation of designed and emergent practice a reply
url http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/11278
work_keys_str_mv AT pauljoyce onreificationareinterpretationofdesignedandemergentpracticeareply
AT bernardlisewski onreificationareinterpretationofdesignedandemergentpracticeareply