A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product Lifetime

Harvested wood products (HWPs) are a class of products that are recognized for their potential to mitigate climate warming: the absorption of CO<sub>2</sub>, which is necessary to the growth of their biomass feedstock, temporarily reduces the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stéphane Kouamé, Ali Ghannadzadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3163
_version_ 1797608027744894976
author Stéphane Kouamé
Ali Ghannadzadeh
author_facet Stéphane Kouamé
Ali Ghannadzadeh
author_sort Stéphane Kouamé
collection DOAJ
description Harvested wood products (HWPs) are a class of products that are recognized for their potential to mitigate climate warming: the absorption of CO<sub>2</sub>, which is necessary to the growth of their biomass feedstock, temporarily reduces the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> present in the Earth’s atmosphere, effectively mitigating global warming. This study decided to look into the effect of changing two important parameters associated with HWPs: the rotation period of the biomass used for their raw material (effectively, the rate of CO<sub>2</sub> absorption), and the length of their lifetime (effectively, the amount of time the captured carbon is stored within them in the form of embodied carbon). For this purpose, a carbon accounting calculator, Quantis’ Biogenic Carbon Footprint Calculator for Harvested Wood Products (BCFC-HWP), was employed. The Biogenic Global Warming Potential (GWP<sub>bio</sub>) metric, which was used by the BCFC-HWP to describe the climate impact of a wooden product’s embodied carbon, was analyzed for its evolution with respect to the two identified parameters. The results showed that while GWP<sub>bio</sub> followed a consistent decrease with respect to the product lifetime parameter, it showed a non-consistently evolving trend with respect to biomass rotation period i.e. first decreasing then increasing. This made the confrontation of both parameters’ effect complex mathematically, such that no clear-cut conclusions on the relative benefits of changing one parameter versus the other were made. Nonetheless, a valuable resolution was made based on the observations regarding the evolution of GWP<sub>bio</sub> with respect to the lifetime of an HWP: the results indicated that extending the lifetime of an HWP is an advantageous strategy in decreasing the climate effect of the considered product.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:37:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-724ac580ff7e4e1fbafcea5db02b0898
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:37:49Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-724ac580ff7e4e1fbafcea5db02b08982023-11-17T16:38:16ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-03-01167316310.3390/en16073163A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product LifetimeStéphane Kouamé0Ali Ghannadzadeh1Aachen-Maastricht Institute for Biobased Materials (AMIBM), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, 6167 RD Geleen, The NetherlandsAachen-Maastricht Institute for Biobased Materials (AMIBM), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, 6167 RD Geleen, The NetherlandsHarvested wood products (HWPs) are a class of products that are recognized for their potential to mitigate climate warming: the absorption of CO<sub>2</sub>, which is necessary to the growth of their biomass feedstock, temporarily reduces the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> present in the Earth’s atmosphere, effectively mitigating global warming. This study decided to look into the effect of changing two important parameters associated with HWPs: the rotation period of the biomass used for their raw material (effectively, the rate of CO<sub>2</sub> absorption), and the length of their lifetime (effectively, the amount of time the captured carbon is stored within them in the form of embodied carbon). For this purpose, a carbon accounting calculator, Quantis’ Biogenic Carbon Footprint Calculator for Harvested Wood Products (BCFC-HWP), was employed. The Biogenic Global Warming Potential (GWP<sub>bio</sub>) metric, which was used by the BCFC-HWP to describe the climate impact of a wooden product’s embodied carbon, was analyzed for its evolution with respect to the two identified parameters. The results showed that while GWP<sub>bio</sub> followed a consistent decrease with respect to the product lifetime parameter, it showed a non-consistently evolving trend with respect to biomass rotation period i.e. first decreasing then increasing. This made the confrontation of both parameters’ effect complex mathematically, such that no clear-cut conclusions on the relative benefits of changing one parameter versus the other were made. Nonetheless, a valuable resolution was made based on the observations regarding the evolution of GWP<sub>bio</sub> with respect to the lifetime of an HWP: the results indicated that extending the lifetime of an HWP is an advantageous strategy in decreasing the climate effect of the considered product.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3163carbon footprintharvested wood productsproduct lifetimebiomass rotation period
spellingShingle Stéphane Kouamé
Ali Ghannadzadeh
A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product Lifetime
Energies
carbon footprint
harvested wood products
product lifetime
biomass rotation period
title A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product Lifetime
title_full A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product Lifetime
title_fullStr A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product Lifetime
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product Lifetime
title_short A Comparative Parametric Study on Dynamic Biogenic Carbon of Harvested Wood Products: Biomass Rotation Period vs. Product Lifetime
title_sort comparative parametric study on dynamic biogenic carbon of harvested wood products biomass rotation period vs product lifetime
topic carbon footprint
harvested wood products
product lifetime
biomass rotation period
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3163
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanekouame acomparativeparametricstudyondynamicbiogeniccarbonofharvestedwoodproductsbiomassrotationperiodvsproductlifetime
AT alighannadzadeh acomparativeparametricstudyondynamicbiogeniccarbonofharvestedwoodproductsbiomassrotationperiodvsproductlifetime
AT stephanekouame comparativeparametricstudyondynamicbiogeniccarbonofharvestedwoodproductsbiomassrotationperiodvsproductlifetime
AT alighannadzadeh comparativeparametricstudyondynamicbiogeniccarbonofharvestedwoodproductsbiomassrotationperiodvsproductlifetime