Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running

The knee flexion angle is an important measurement for studies of the human gait. Running is a common activity with a high risk of knee injury. Studying the running gait in realistic situations is challenging because accurate joint angle measurements typically come from optical motion-capture system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew B. Rhudy, Joseph M. Mahoney, Allison R. Altman-Singles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/2/695
_version_ 1797339346951471104
author Matthew B. Rhudy
Joseph M. Mahoney
Allison R. Altman-Singles
author_facet Matthew B. Rhudy
Joseph M. Mahoney
Allison R. Altman-Singles
author_sort Matthew B. Rhudy
collection DOAJ
description The knee flexion angle is an important measurement for studies of the human gait. Running is a common activity with a high risk of knee injury. Studying the running gait in realistic situations is challenging because accurate joint angle measurements typically come from optical motion-capture systems constrained to laboratory settings. This study considers the use of shank and thigh inertial sensors within three different filtering algorithms to estimate the knee flexion angle for running without requiring sensor-to-segment mounting assumptions, body measurements, specific calibration poses, or magnetometers. The objective of this study is to determine the knee flexion angle within running applications using accelerometer and gyroscope information only. Data were collected for a single test participant (21-year-old female) at four different treadmill speeds and used to validate the estimation results for three filter variations with respect to a Vicon optical motion-capture system. The knee flexion angle filtering algorithms resulted in root-mean-square errors of approximately three degrees. The results of this study indicate estimation results that are within acceptable limits of five degrees for clinical gait analysis. Specifically, a complementary filter approach is effective for knee flexion angle estimation in running applications.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:46:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7251492ec37041198bd3f5a0a2721eaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:46:38Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-7251492ec37041198bd3f5a0a2721eaa2024-01-29T14:18:28ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202024-01-0124269510.3390/s24020695Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for RunningMatthew B. Rhudy0Joseph M. Mahoney1Allison R. Altman-Singles2Mechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, Berks College, Reading, PA 19610, USAMechanical Engineering, Alvernia University, Reading, PA 19607, USAMechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, Berks College, Reading, PA 19610, USAThe knee flexion angle is an important measurement for studies of the human gait. Running is a common activity with a high risk of knee injury. Studying the running gait in realistic situations is challenging because accurate joint angle measurements typically come from optical motion-capture systems constrained to laboratory settings. This study considers the use of shank and thigh inertial sensors within three different filtering algorithms to estimate the knee flexion angle for running without requiring sensor-to-segment mounting assumptions, body measurements, specific calibration poses, or magnetometers. The objective of this study is to determine the knee flexion angle within running applications using accelerometer and gyroscope information only. Data were collected for a single test participant (21-year-old female) at four different treadmill speeds and used to validate the estimation results for three filter variations with respect to a Vicon optical motion-capture system. The knee flexion angle filtering algorithms resulted in root-mean-square errors of approximately three degrees. The results of this study indicate estimation results that are within acceptable limits of five degrees for clinical gait analysis. Specifically, a complementary filter approach is effective for knee flexion angle estimation in running applications.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/2/695inertial measurement unitsgait analysiskinematic constraintsKalman filtering
spellingShingle Matthew B. Rhudy
Joseph M. Mahoney
Allison R. Altman-Singles
Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running
Sensors
inertial measurement units
gait analysis
kinematic constraints
Kalman filtering
title Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running
title_full Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running
title_fullStr Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running
title_full_unstemmed Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running
title_short Knee Angle Estimation with Dynamic Calibration Using Inertial Measurement Units for Running
title_sort knee angle estimation with dynamic calibration using inertial measurement units for running
topic inertial measurement units
gait analysis
kinematic constraints
Kalman filtering
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/2/695
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewbrhudy kneeangleestimationwithdynamiccalibrationusinginertialmeasurementunitsforrunning
AT josephmmahoney kneeangleestimationwithdynamiccalibrationusinginertialmeasurementunitsforrunning
AT allisonraltmansingles kneeangleestimationwithdynamiccalibrationusinginertialmeasurementunitsforrunning