Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River Water

Drinking water treatment (DWT) using low–pressure membranes (LPM) has become increasingly popular due to their many reported advantages compared to conventional technologies. Productivity decline due to fouling has prevented LPMs from becoming the technology of choice in DWT, however, coagulation pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph D. Ladouceur, Roberto M. Narbaitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-10-01
Series:Membranes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/12/11/1028
_version_ 1827646144870612992
author Joseph D. Ladouceur
Roberto M. Narbaitz
author_facet Joseph D. Ladouceur
Roberto M. Narbaitz
author_sort Joseph D. Ladouceur
collection DOAJ
description Drinking water treatment (DWT) using low–pressure membranes (LPM) has become increasingly popular due to their many reported advantages compared to conventional technologies. Productivity decline due to fouling has prevented LPMs from becoming the technology of choice in DWT, however, coagulation pretreatment either with or without particle separation mitigates fouling phenomena. The effectiveness of coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation (CF–S), coagulation/flocculation/dissolved air flotation (CF–DAF), and inline coagulation (CF–IN) as technologies for pretreatment of feed water has rarely been investigated using the same water source. In this study, CF–S, CF–DAF, and CF–IN are directly compared as pretreatment of a tubular multi–channeled ultrafiltration (UF) membrane using the same highly colored river water. Three–day long filtration tests were performed using an automated bench–scale filtration apparatus with an inside–out configuration. Although CF–DAF had the greatest removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and hydrophobic organics, CF–S pretreatment resulted in a similar level of total fouling. Compared to CF–DAF and CF–S, CF–IN pretreatment resulted in lower fouling. The hydraulic and chemical reversibility of CF–IN fouling was seen to be strongly influenced by the feed water zeta potential, suggesting the importance of floc electrostatic and morphological characteristics on inline coagulation performance.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:51:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72711945ad8f4b75b612be2594a1324a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0375
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:51:55Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Membranes
spelling doaj.art-72711945ad8f4b75b612be2594a1324a2023-11-24T05:47:57ZengMDPI AGMembranes2077-03752022-10-011211102810.3390/membranes12111028Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River WaterJoseph D. Ladouceur0Roberto M. Narbaitz1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaDrinking water treatment (DWT) using low–pressure membranes (LPM) has become increasingly popular due to their many reported advantages compared to conventional technologies. Productivity decline due to fouling has prevented LPMs from becoming the technology of choice in DWT, however, coagulation pretreatment either with or without particle separation mitigates fouling phenomena. The effectiveness of coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation (CF–S), coagulation/flocculation/dissolved air flotation (CF–DAF), and inline coagulation (CF–IN) as technologies for pretreatment of feed water has rarely been investigated using the same water source. In this study, CF–S, CF–DAF, and CF–IN are directly compared as pretreatment of a tubular multi–channeled ultrafiltration (UF) membrane using the same highly colored river water. Three–day long filtration tests were performed using an automated bench–scale filtration apparatus with an inside–out configuration. Although CF–DAF had the greatest removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and hydrophobic organics, CF–S pretreatment resulted in a similar level of total fouling. Compared to CF–DAF and CF–S, CF–IN pretreatment resulted in lower fouling. The hydraulic and chemical reversibility of CF–IN fouling was seen to be strongly influenced by the feed water zeta potential, suggesting the importance of floc electrostatic and morphological characteristics on inline coagulation performance.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/12/11/1028membrane foulinginline coagulationultrafiltrationnatural organic matterdissolved air flotationcolored water
spellingShingle Joseph D. Ladouceur
Roberto M. Narbaitz
Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River Water
Membranes
membrane fouling
inline coagulation
ultrafiltration
natural organic matter
dissolved air flotation
colored water
title Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River Water
title_full Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River Water
title_fullStr Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River Water
title_full_unstemmed Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River Water
title_short Reduced Low–Pressure Membrane Fouling by Inline Coagulation Pretreatment for a Colored River Water
title_sort reduced low pressure membrane fouling by inline coagulation pretreatment for a colored river water
topic membrane fouling
inline coagulation
ultrafiltration
natural organic matter
dissolved air flotation
colored water
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/12/11/1028
work_keys_str_mv AT josephdladouceur reducedlowpressuremembranefoulingbyinlinecoagulationpretreatmentforacoloredriverwater
AT robertomnarbaitz reducedlowpressuremembranefoulingbyinlinecoagulationpretreatmentforacoloredriverwater