Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house builders

The housing sector accounts for a majority of newly constructed buildings. Prefabrication, defined as the factory construction of houses or significant components, is widely promoted as a means to improve efficiency. This paper focuses on the research questions: RQ1. What are the attitudes of builde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dale A Steinhardt, Karen Manley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2016-06-01
Series:Construction Economics and Building
Subjects:
Online Access:https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/4741
_version_ 1811284247243128832
author Dale A Steinhardt
Karen Manley
author_facet Dale A Steinhardt
Karen Manley
author_sort Dale A Steinhardt
collection DOAJ
description The housing sector accounts for a majority of newly constructed buildings. Prefabrication, defined as the factory construction of houses or significant components, is widely promoted as a means to improve efficiency. This paper focuses on the research questions: RQ1. What are the attitudes of builders towards prefabrication adoption? RQ2. What types of stakeholders do builders believe influence their adoption decisions? RQ3. What types of contextual influences do builders believe impact their adoption decisions? Current prefabrication research has focused on the advantages and disadvantages of prefabrication, without further unpacking the beliefs of stakeholders that underpin them. This paper addresses this gap and increases the understanding of beliefs that can frame interventions to increase the market penetration of prefabrication. Fourteen interviews with Australian prefabricators were undertaken as a Belief Elicitation Study. This qualitative methodology is framed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Results show that modern high-quality prefabricated housing has struggled to overcome historical stigma; improved construction speed has not and is not likely to translate to reduced totals costs for a majority of firms; and prefabrication adoption has been hindered by an almost completely unsupportive industry infrastructure. Recommendations are made to frame arguments in improving short-term outcomes for an industry driven by practical considerations. Future discourse must focus on cost impacts, financial security and risk reduction. Establishing networks of prefabricators that can build a strong, unified voice for the industry should be prioritised.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:26:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72740bd31b60451d88d2c801b7878e71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2204-9029
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:26:38Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher UTS ePRESS
record_format Article
series Construction Economics and Building
spelling doaj.art-72740bd31b60451d88d2c801b7878e712022-12-22T03:06:46ZengUTS ePRESSConstruction Economics and Building2204-90292016-06-0116210.5130/AJCEB.v16i2.47413084Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house buildersDale A Steinhardt0Karen Manley1Queensland University of TechnologyQueensland University of Technology (QUT)The housing sector accounts for a majority of newly constructed buildings. Prefabrication, defined as the factory construction of houses or significant components, is widely promoted as a means to improve efficiency. This paper focuses on the research questions: RQ1. What are the attitudes of builders towards prefabrication adoption? RQ2. What types of stakeholders do builders believe influence their adoption decisions? RQ3. What types of contextual influences do builders believe impact their adoption decisions? Current prefabrication research has focused on the advantages and disadvantages of prefabrication, without further unpacking the beliefs of stakeholders that underpin them. This paper addresses this gap and increases the understanding of beliefs that can frame interventions to increase the market penetration of prefabrication. Fourteen interviews with Australian prefabricators were undertaken as a Belief Elicitation Study. This qualitative methodology is framed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Results show that modern high-quality prefabricated housing has struggled to overcome historical stigma; improved construction speed has not and is not likely to translate to reduced totals costs for a majority of firms; and prefabrication adoption has been hindered by an almost completely unsupportive industry infrastructure. Recommendations are made to frame arguments in improving short-term outcomes for an industry driven by practical considerations. Future discourse must focus on cost impacts, financial security and risk reduction. Establishing networks of prefabricators that can build a strong, unified voice for the industry should be prioritised.https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/4741HousingprefabricationAustraliabeliefsattitudes
spellingShingle Dale A Steinhardt
Karen Manley
Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house builders
Construction Economics and Building
Housing
prefabrication
Australia
beliefs
attitudes
title Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house builders
title_full Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house builders
title_fullStr Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house builders
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house builders
title_short Exploring the beliefs of Australian prefabricated house builders
title_sort exploring the beliefs of australian prefabricated house builders
topic Housing
prefabrication
Australia
beliefs
attitudes
url https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/4741
work_keys_str_mv AT daleasteinhardt exploringthebeliefsofaustralianprefabricatedhousebuilders
AT karenmanley exploringthebeliefsofaustralianprefabricatedhousebuilders