Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations

Moral foundations theory (MFT) has provided an account of the moral values that underscore different cultural and political ideologies, and these moral values of harm, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity can help to explain differences in political and cultural ideologies; however, the extent t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David S. M. Morris, Brandon D. Stewart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869121/full
_version_ 1798028343963025408
author David S. M. Morris
Brandon D. Stewart
author_facet David S. M. Morris
Brandon D. Stewart
author_sort David S. M. Morris
collection DOAJ
description Moral foundations theory (MFT) has provided an account of the moral values that underscore different cultural and political ideologies, and these moral values of harm, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity can help to explain differences in political and cultural ideologies; however, the extent to which moral foundations relate to strong social ideologies, intergroup processes and threat perceptions is still underdeveloped. To explore this relationship, we conducted two studies. In Study 1 (N = 157), we considered how the moral foundations predicted strong social ideologies such as authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) as well as attitudes toward immigrants. Here, we demonstrated that more endorsement of individualizing moral foundations (average of harm and fairness) was related to less negative intergroup attitudes, which was mediated by SDO, and that more endorsement of binding moral foundations (the average of loyalty, authority, and purity) was related to more negative attitudes, which was mediated by RWA. Crucially, further analyses also suggested the importance of threat perceptions as an underlying explanatory variable. Study 2 (N = 388) replicated these findings and extended them by measuring attitudes toward a different group reflecting an ethnic minority in the United States, and by testing the ordering of variables while also replicating and confirming the threat effects. These studies have important implications for using MFT to understand strong ideologies, intergroup relations, and threat perceptions.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:06:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-728438a88e9d4b25a3a3e2442168b706
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:06:20Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-728438a88e9d4b25a3a3e2442168b7062022-12-22T04:07:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-10-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.869121869121Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relationsDavid S. M. Morris0Brandon D. Stewart1School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME, United StatesMoral foundations theory (MFT) has provided an account of the moral values that underscore different cultural and political ideologies, and these moral values of harm, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity can help to explain differences in political and cultural ideologies; however, the extent to which moral foundations relate to strong social ideologies, intergroup processes and threat perceptions is still underdeveloped. To explore this relationship, we conducted two studies. In Study 1 (N = 157), we considered how the moral foundations predicted strong social ideologies such as authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) as well as attitudes toward immigrants. Here, we demonstrated that more endorsement of individualizing moral foundations (average of harm and fairness) was related to less negative intergroup attitudes, which was mediated by SDO, and that more endorsement of binding moral foundations (the average of loyalty, authority, and purity) was related to more negative attitudes, which was mediated by RWA. Crucially, further analyses also suggested the importance of threat perceptions as an underlying explanatory variable. Study 2 (N = 388) replicated these findings and extended them by measuring attitudes toward a different group reflecting an ethnic minority in the United States, and by testing the ordering of variables while also replicating and confirming the threat effects. These studies have important implications for using MFT to understand strong ideologies, intergroup relations, and threat perceptions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869121/fullmoral foundations theoryideologythreatintergroup relationsauthoritarianismsocial dominance orientation
spellingShingle David S. M. Morris
Brandon D. Stewart
Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations
Frontiers in Psychology
moral foundations theory
ideology
threat
intergroup relations
authoritarianism
social dominance orientation
title Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations
title_full Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations
title_fullStr Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations
title_full_unstemmed Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations
title_short Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations
title_sort moral values social ideologies and threat based cognition implications for intergroup relations
topic moral foundations theory
ideology
threat
intergroup relations
authoritarianism
social dominance orientation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869121/full
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsmmorris moralvaluessocialideologiesandthreatbasedcognitionimplicationsforintergrouprelations
AT brandondstewart moralvaluessocialideologiesandthreatbasedcognitionimplicationsforintergrouprelations