Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopy for treating stones in the renal pelvis and proximal ureter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from August 2003 to August 2004, 35 retroperitoneoscopies for treatment of urinary stones were performed on 34 patients. Fifteen patients (42%) h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo S. Soares, Pedro Romanelli, Marcos A. Sandoval, Marcelo M. Salim, Jose E. Tavora, David L. Abelha Jr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2005-04-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200004
_version_ 1828523686722797568
author Rodrigo S. Soares
Pedro Romanelli
Marcos A. Sandoval
Marcelo M. Salim
Jose E. Tavora
David L. Abelha Jr
author_facet Rodrigo S. Soares
Pedro Romanelli
Marcos A. Sandoval
Marcelo M. Salim
Jose E. Tavora
David L. Abelha Jr
author_sort Rodrigo S. Soares
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopy for treating stones in the renal pelvis and proximal ureter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from August 2003 to August 2004, 35 retroperitoneoscopies for treatment of urinary stones were performed on 34 patients. Fifteen patients (42%) had stones in the renal pelvis, and in 2 cases, there were associated stones in the upper caliceal group. Twenty patients (58%) had ureteral stones, all of them located above the iliac vessel. Twenty-five patients (71%) had previously undergone at least one session of extracorporeal lithotripsy and 8 patients (26%) also underwent ureteroscopy to attempt to remove the stone. Eight patients underwent retroperitoneoscopy as a primary procedure. Stone size ranged from 0.5 to 6 cm with a mean of 2.1 cm. RESULTS: Retroperitoneoscopy was performed by lumbar approach with initial access conducted by open technique and creation of space by digital dissection. We used a 10-mm Hasson trocar for the optics, and 2 or 3 additional working ports placed under visualization. Following identification, the urinary tract was opened with a laparoscopic scalpel and the stone was removed intact. The urinary tract was closed with absorbable 4-0 suture and a Penrose drain was left in the retroperitoneum. In 17 patients (49%), a double-J stent was maintained postoperatively. Surgical time ranged from 60 to 260 minutes with a mean of 140 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 3 days (1-10 days). The mean length of retroperitoneal urinary drainage was 3 days (1-10 days). There were minor complications in 6 (17.6%) patients and 1 case of conversion due to technical difficulty. Thirty-three patients (94%) became stone free. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneoscopy is an effective, low-morbidity alternative for treatment of urinary stones.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T20:32:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-729a9ce68cb0466d8370726180efcb5b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-5538
1677-6119
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T20:32:15Z
publishDate 2005-04-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format Article
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-729a9ce68cb0466d8370726180efcb5b2022-12-22T00:51:46ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-55381677-61192005-04-0131211111610.1590/S1677-55382005000200004Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stonesRodrigo S. SoaresPedro RomanelliMarcos A. SandovalMarcelo M. SalimJose E. TavoraDavid L. Abelha JrOBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopy for treating stones in the renal pelvis and proximal ureter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period from August 2003 to August 2004, 35 retroperitoneoscopies for treatment of urinary stones were performed on 34 patients. Fifteen patients (42%) had stones in the renal pelvis, and in 2 cases, there were associated stones in the upper caliceal group. Twenty patients (58%) had ureteral stones, all of them located above the iliac vessel. Twenty-five patients (71%) had previously undergone at least one session of extracorporeal lithotripsy and 8 patients (26%) also underwent ureteroscopy to attempt to remove the stone. Eight patients underwent retroperitoneoscopy as a primary procedure. Stone size ranged from 0.5 to 6 cm with a mean of 2.1 cm. RESULTS: Retroperitoneoscopy was performed by lumbar approach with initial access conducted by open technique and creation of space by digital dissection. We used a 10-mm Hasson trocar for the optics, and 2 or 3 additional working ports placed under visualization. Following identification, the urinary tract was opened with a laparoscopic scalpel and the stone was removed intact. The urinary tract was closed with absorbable 4-0 suture and a Penrose drain was left in the retroperitoneum. In 17 patients (49%), a double-J stent was maintained postoperatively. Surgical time ranged from 60 to 260 minutes with a mean of 140 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 3 days (1-10 days). The mean length of retroperitoneal urinary drainage was 3 days (1-10 days). There were minor complications in 6 (17.6%) patients and 1 case of conversion due to technical difficulty. Thirty-three patients (94%) became stone free. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneoscopy is an effective, low-morbidity alternative for treatment of urinary stones.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200004kidney calculiureteral calculisurgerylaparoscopyretroperitoneal space
spellingShingle Rodrigo S. Soares
Pedro Romanelli
Marcos A. Sandoval
Marcelo M. Salim
Jose E. Tavora
David L. Abelha Jr
Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
kidney calculi
ureteral calculi
surgery
laparoscopy
retroperitoneal space
title Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones
title_full Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones
title_fullStr Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones
title_full_unstemmed Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones
title_short Retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones
title_sort retroperitoneoscopy for treatment of renal and ureteral stones
topic kidney calculi
ureteral calculi
surgery
laparoscopy
retroperitoneal space
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200004
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigossoares retroperitoneoscopyfortreatmentofrenalandureteralstones
AT pedroromanelli retroperitoneoscopyfortreatmentofrenalandureteralstones
AT marcosasandoval retroperitoneoscopyfortreatmentofrenalandureteralstones
AT marcelomsalim retroperitoneoscopyfortreatmentofrenalandureteralstones
AT joseetavora retroperitoneoscopyfortreatmentofrenalandureteralstones
AT davidlabelhajr retroperitoneoscopyfortreatmentofrenalandureteralstones